It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Ya did you see how agressive he was with the female officer!? I don't know how she made it out alive!
Thank you for thinking me part of the problem. I actually loved working with the public but you don't care about that you just want to talk down to an officer or, in my case, a disabled/retired officer.
Edit to add: You probably think that she was well within her rights to be fiddling with her cell phone and running me down.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
I was just addressing your claim of him being agressive.
Was what he did first a physical attack?
The finger point I mean.
Also just cause the one guy reacted the way he did, does that make it the correct way to do it?
What fallacy did I use by the way?
Inside
the cruiser, Dehmann “hit the Plexiglas cage, messed with the camera
and spit on the passenger-side window.”
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Gee thanks for that, especially since nothing contradicts what I said. I would imagine locking the choke in and putting him to sleep is not allowed, so no, that was not an option.
Actually it is, and you don't even realize you are supporting my post. The poster said he was pile drived onto his head. That did not happen. He was slammed onto his back and his head bounced off the floor. He was not slammed on top of his head, that did not occur.
Aahhhh no, you don't let a drunk, aggressive person put their hand up to your face. The officer was absolutely right to swat it away.
Thanks, I already knew all that, it's simply not that relevant, but, if anything, it's evidence there was NOT any intent to slam the guys head. The intent was to put him on his back and secure him, not knock him out by smashing his head on the ground.
I know all about Judo, BJJ, and the maneuver that was used. Police can't choke a guy unconscious, he does not have that option no matter how much you want him to. There is no problem with what the officer did
originally posted by: MrWendal
I also am not aware of any "rule" that says a Corrections Officer can not choke out an inmate in an act of self defense. Perhaps you can link that to us?
As I taught Defensive Tactics Instructors courses for other law enforcement departments, I was surprised to learn the FBI is one of very few agencies that still permit the use of a carotid-type restraint.
originally posted by: mikelkhall
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: mikelkhall
There is simply no need for the officer to have responded with such heavy force.....if you see this is as ok i am glad you are no longer an officer as you are of part of the problem....
originally posted by: MrWendal
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Question.....
If it was "illegal" for an Officer to choke a person out, why would there be a bill up for consideration that makes it illegal?
Let me help you....
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: MrWendal
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Question.....
If it was "illegal" for an Officer to choke a person out, why would there be a bill up for consideration that makes it illegal?
Let me help you....
So now you nitpick. Fine, it's not illegal, it's simply banned. Feel better now? Banned, where I am from at least, means it can't be done. What does banned mean where you live?
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Ya i guess it is a fallacy to bring up how some one else handled the situation seconds before another. Which one us that again?
Oh well, good this serial pointer is the streets. Those points are some serious attacks that really endanger the lives of all of us!
The police are trained to handle the public. Sometimes the public, especially when breaking the law, does not want to be handled.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MrWendal
So what does one need to do to provoke such a hold being used these days, fart in the back of their vehicle?
Even if such a hold were legal, smacking the poor fellows head off the floor certainly is not acceptable considering once in Police custody they have a duty of care towards anyone the detain. The poor man was autistic and this is so far past the line i dont even know where to begin.
Therefor- there really was no need to slam him down. The Officer could have easily just held that position for a few seconds (cause drunk guys DO go out quick), and allowed his coworkers to get a handle on this guy- then this would have been over with. The need to throw him down was intentional and done with the intent to cause harm. There is no doubt in my mind on that.
Aahhhh no, you don't let a drunk, aggressive person put their hand up to your face. The officer was absolutely right to swat it away.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Ya i guess it is a fallacy to bring up how some one else handled the situation seconds before another. Which one us that again?
Oh well, good this serial pointer is the streets. Those points are some serious attacks that really endanger the lives of all of us!
Awesome job ignoring where I show how aggressive he was. Ignore evidence, rely on logical fallacies. Consistent at least.
1 a : tending toward or exhibiting aggression
b : marked by combative readiness