It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
The theory of relativity describes the structure of space time. Its a theory and never been verified...
So if relativity later turns out to be wrong then indeed space will return to nothing. Telsa who was brighter Einstein and the poster above thought it was bull. . Telsa not only made his own mathematical expressions of the things he brought to the modern world; he tested and conclusively verified them as well. The Emc squred isn't that hard to derive from previous established formula expressions if you know a bit of integral calculus. People who are bedazzled by jargondy physics terms, and lack mathematical ability will fall the Space is curved fluff.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
a reply to: AthlonSavage
It was Tesla who called Einstein an idiot together with his theories.
And no he was not the only one saying that. The brightest minds of that time agreed with him and was proven in experiments that GR and QM was nothing more than a fairy tale, but all ignored.
Yes Tesla actually did physical experiments, Einstein on the other hand.
I'm waiting for the claim that Tesla was in love with a pigeon,...
even Einstein, before he went insane, said the ether is real, without it nothing can exist.
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
a reply to: Bedlam
dude its midnight here, do u think I give a # about a typo or do you need to have an interpreter to help you in these threads.
Your link contains many experiments verifying relativity as much as any theory can be verified. Did you read it?
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
The theory of relativity describes the structure of space time. Its a theory and never been verified. For those who think otherwise link the source. Wait ll link it for you.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: awareness10
The scientific definition of the word 'theory' is not the same as the common definition.
Are you kidding QM was schroedinger's brain child. Einstein should not be thanked for anything really.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: intergalactic fire
Does your computer contain transistors and/or flash memory? If so, yes, you can thank Einstein for getting the QM ball rolling.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: awareness10
A scientific theory is:
"a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation".
en.wikipedia.org...
It's not a guess. It's not a hunch. It's not a speculation.
originally posted by: awareness10
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: awareness10
A scientific theory is:
"a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation".
en.wikipedia.org...
It's not a guess. It's not a hunch. It's not a speculation.
No it's not unless everything we believe is real Isn't.
Such as the holographic universe. Great book btw.
www.amazon.com...=cm_cr_pr_product_top?ie=UTF8
I read this book 10 yrs ago, intriguing to say the least, it really wakes up that dormant part of a person they never realized existed. You should try it sometime.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: awareness10
No, you don't get to change the definition of scientific theory and dismiss observational evidence because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside. That's not how science works.
originally posted by: Nochzwei
Are you kidding QM was schroedinger's brain child. Einstein should not be thanked for anything really.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: intergalactic fire
Does your computer contain transistors and/or flash memory? If so, yes, you can thank Einstein for getting the QM ball rolling.