It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The murder charges filed against the Baltimore officers who arrested Freddie Gray could be dropped, because the police investigation into his death doesn't support the prosecution's case, it's been reported.
Last Friday, Baltimore City State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby levelled charges ranging from assault to second-degree murder at six police officers involved in Gray's death. He had suffered a fatal spinal injury while in police custody.
However, officials familiar with the case have revealed that police investigators do not agree with the charges.
The murder charges filed against the Baltimore officers who arrested Freddie Gray could be dropped
What's more, defense lawyers are mounting a challenge to Mosby's assertion that the officers had unlawfully arrested Gray because the knife he had in his pocket is considered legal under Maryland state law.
That's what happens when trying to appeal to the unrest of the masses in a hasty fashion. Sounds like they jumped the gun prior to the investigation being completed and are now having to backtrack in order to get any charge they can.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Vasa Croe
That's what happens when trying to appeal to the unrest of the masses in a hasty fashion. Sounds like they jumped the gun prior to the investigation being completed and are now having to backtrack in order to get any charge they can.
They don't bring charges in the first place unless there is probable cause. Especially in a case like this. The charges would stick if they went to trial. The abuse there is historic, the people are pissed at that, not CVS.
This is what happens when a prosecutor just throws around a bunch of charges to appease the rioting masses and sees what sticks. I have this sinking feeling she only delayed the inevitable.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
This is what happens when a prosecutor just throws around a bunch of charges to appease the rioting masses and sees what sticks. I have this sinking feeling she only delayed the inevitable.
The inevitable dismissal of police brutality you mean? This isn't pin the tail on the Donkey. They wouldn't have filed charges unless they had evidence of wrongful doing.
Like who doesn't know that?
If the final investigation does not support the charges then trial would not matter.
They also wouldn't be considering dropping them if that evidence was not complete and now that it is, it does not show evidence of wrongdoing….
I disagree, I think some charges will stick and at least SOME of the officers will be put away. But what the DA was doing with her charges was basically acquiescing to mob mentality while making flowery speeches about justice and peace. Some of these officer are going to jail, you can count on that, but a murder conviction is highly unlikely.
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: dashen
The DA is a shill. She is there to protect the blue line and is an enemy of the citizens, the nation and the law itself, which are all on the other side of that line.
This was never going anywhere.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
This is what happens when a prosecutor just throws around a bunch of charges to appease the rioting masses and sees what sticks. I have this sinking feeling she only delayed the inevitable.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Vasa Croe
If the final investigation does not support the charges then trial would not matter.
The "final investigation" is a trial. Thats where the final decision (verdict) should be rendered.
Ludicrous to suggest that "investigators" (the police) make any "final" decision about it. But hey, systemic injustice rules the day…