It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In a study of nearly 26,000 beneficiaries of Tricare, the military health system, those taking statin drugs to control their cholesterol were 87 percent more likely to develop diabetes. The research confirms past findings on the link between the widely prescribed drugs and diabetes risk. But it is among the first to show the connection in a relatively healthy group of people. The study included only people who at baseline were free of heart disease, diabetes, and other severe chronic disease.
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: Xeven
They may be a factor in the development of Alzheimer's as well.
The Clue to Why Low Fat Diet and Statins may Cause Alzheimer’s
Statin users were also 14 percent more likely to become overweight or obese after being on the drugs.
"No patient should stop taking their statins based on our study, since statin therapy is a cornerstone in treatment of cardiovascular diseases and has been clearly shown to lower mortality and disease progression," he says. "Rather, this study should alert researchers, [clinical] guideline writers, and policymakers that short-term clinical trials might not fully describe the risks and benefits of long-term statin use for primary prevention."
originally posted by: schuyler
I personally believe statins are over-prescribed ... Snip
So your choice is this: Would you rather stop taking statins ... Snip
originally posted by: wondering5740
a reply to: Xeven
About a year ago a friend developed diabetes and her doctor told her a large majority of women on statins were also developing diabetes but then we never heard anymore about it. Thanks for the link I'll have to get this to her.
originally posted by: Cricketine
Another reason why I'm pissed at this country. It creates health problems with nutritionally unsound food recommendations then creates pharmaceuticals to help with the illness and disease caused which then causes more health problems.
When will this dangerous stupidity end?
originally posted by: schuyler
Be careful drawing conclusions. The same study cited above also says:
"No patient should stop taking their statins based on our study, since statin therapy is a cornerstone in treatment of cardiovascular diseases and has been clearly shown to lower mortality and disease progression," he says. "Rather, this study should alert researchers, [clinical] guideline writers, and policymakers that short-term clinical trials might not fully describe the risks and benefits of long-term statin use for primary prevention."
I personally believe statins are over-prescribed, but the fact is that high cholesterol and cardio-vascular disease are clearly connected and cardio-vascular disease accounts for 610,000 deaths per year, 1 in 4. Every year there are 735,000 heart attacks (American: CDC is source.) Deaths from diabetes? 75,000. (Source.)
So your choice is this: Would you rather stop taking statins, which attempts to lower your risk for heart disease which kills 1 in 4 because you risk getting diabetes, which kills 1 in 40? I know it's not as simple as that because nothing is absolute, but the fact is that type 2 diabetes is controllable if you do get it (diet, exercise, Metforin, etc.), and a heart attack isn't.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Xeven
For many years the side effects of statins is been know, the reason is coming out now is because the human cases that are showing off with the side effects.
We ask how come if the side effects were known before they didn't warn the public, the answer is one that you may know already, is about money and profit margins.
Big pharma was selling statins like candy in the US because people rather take a pill than addressing what is hurting their health.
When statins came out first time they were only to be prescribed after a person already didn't have much choice, and do to statins side effects they were to be only closed monitored and for short term.
Now you get statins for life.
Who are we to blame, even I was offered to take statins by my doctor, I told her thanks but no thanks, my brain and hart will love me for that.
originally posted by: Snarl
originally posted by: schuyler
I personally believe statins are over-prescribed ... Snip
So your choice is this: Would you rather stop taking statins ... Snip
Excellent use of common sense. My doc made it absolutely clear, that once I began taking cholesterol meds ... that I was on them for life.
I want off. A massive coronary may be preferable at my age. Haven't done that yet, but I hear it's quite an exciting experience.
originally posted by: chr0naut
So why continue with statins?