Disclosure of the Moon Landing Hoax: Part 2

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

Did Bart Sibrel play the role of a "wacko Christian taxi driver"? I hope some of you Apollo Reviewers are mature enough to understand the implications of what I am considering... what if... Bart Sibrel was just playing a role?

what if all prominent hoax theorists are playing role?

what does that make their "theories"?? nothing but a wild goose chase.

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

Did Bart Sibrel play the role of a "wacko Christian taxi driver"? I hope some of you Apollo Reviewers are mature enough to understand the implications of what I am considering... what if... Bart Sibrel was just playing a role?

what if all prominent hoax theorists are playing role?

what does that make their "theories"?? nothing but a wild goose chase.

It's not a wild goose chase haha! We know who the perps are.

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

It's not a wild goose chase haha! We know who the perps are.

who is to say?? pretty much every prominent hoax theorists is making money from promoting the hoax theory.. non of their theories can stand up to scrutiny..

so either
A, they are lying to steal your monies
B, they are being paid to distract hoax believers since hoax believers are the only ones capable of stumbling on the truth because they are "smarter" than the general population including professionals.

a reply to: choos

pretty much every prominent hoax theorists is making money from promoting the hoax theory..

Name 3 examples and the sources to back it up.

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: choos

pretty much every prominent hoax theorists is making money from promoting the hoax theory..

Name 3 examples and the sources to back it up.

kaysing, sold books promoting the hoax theory
Sibrel, sells media promoting the hoax theory
White, makes money and asks for donations to do something he deems himself as impossible.

pretty much all prominent hoax theorists make money by selling their "theories"

its probably harder to name one prominent hoax theorists that doesnt make money from this.

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: choos

pretty much every prominent hoax theorists is making money from promoting the hoax theory..

Name 3 examples and the sources to back it up.

kaysing, sold books promoting the hoax theory
Sibrel, sells media promoting the hoax theory
White, makes money and asks for donations to do something he deems himself as impossible.

pretty much all prominent hoax theorists make money by selling their "theories"

its probably harder to name one prominent hoax theorists that doesnt make money from this.

When you said "White, makes money" what sort of evidence do you have to show that he is running a for profit business?

I would argue that Jarrah White is doing us a public service for free, his material is freely available on youtube.

Then take a look at Ed Mitchell. He wanted to sell his moon camera but NASA wouldn't let him. NASA sued Mitchell. Obviously there was a settlement. Will we ever know what that settlement amounted to??? Maybe millions of dollars???

And then, after you start to contemplate those examples, we can re-introduce the Apollo 15 envelope scam to the Apollo narratives... because... you know... Apollo is all about the scandals.

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: choos

pretty much every prominent hoax theorists is making money from promoting the hoax theory..

Name 3 examples and the sources to back it up.

kaysing, sold books promoting the hoax theory
Sibrel, sells media promoting the hoax theory
White, makes money and asks for donations to do something he deems himself as impossible.

pretty much all prominent hoax theorists make money by selling their "theories"

its probably harder to name one prominent hoax theorists that doesnt make money from this.

When you said "White, makes money" what sort of evidence do you have to show that he is running a for profit business?

I would argue that Jarrah White is doing us a public service for free, his material is freely available on youtube.

Then take a look at Ed Mitchell. He wanted to sell his moon camera but NASA wouldn't let him. NASA sued Mitchell. Obviously there was a settlement. Will we ever know what that settlement amounted to??? Maybe millions of dollars???

And then, after you start to contemplate those examples, we can re-introduce the Apollo 15 envelope scam to the Apollo narratives... because... you know... Apollo is all about the scandals.

You Just Regularly Make Things Up Don't you?? THE Settlement Was simple he' relinquishes all claims of ownership, legal title, or dominion' of the 16mm motion picture camera.In exchange NASA Agreed not to prosecute for theft if government property. And they dropped the portion where he would have to pay their legal fees it's all online. But someone wants to make it seem like a backroom deal there are court records you can send for them under the freedom of information act.Just contact the local courthouse there will be a fee and they mail it to you.

If you are the top doctor at NASA, how do you miss this?

a reply to: dragonridr

I showed my sources, you can show your sources now, yes?

What we are looking for in the Apollo narratives are those stories that have been lost and discarded.

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

Oh I forgot you don't know how to research only ask questions and apply misdeeds without facts.
m.space.com...

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

When you said "White, makes money" what sort of evidence do you have to show that he is running a for profit business?

I would argue that Jarrah White is doing us a public service for free, his material is freely available on youtube.

how do you explain his "fly Jarrah to the moon" scheme??

he adamantly believes that the VAB is deadly and is to date impossible to traverse, he even put his maths calculating his theory of just how dangerous it is..

so why does he ask his fans for donations to fly him to the moon?

Then take a look at Ed Mitchell. He wanted to sell his moon camera but NASA wouldn't let him. NASA sued Mitchell. Obviously there was a settlement. Will we ever know what that settlement amounted to??? Maybe millions of dollars???

i dont get what this has to do with prominent hoax theorists swindling money off gullible hoax believers??

you calling Ed Mitchell a hoax theorists by trying to sell his camera? how does that improve the hoax theories?

And then, after you start to contemplate those examples, we can re-introduce the Apollo 15 envelope scam to the Apollo narratives... because... you know... Apollo is all about the scandals.

so nothing?? nothing to say about the hoax theorists making money to deliberately mislead hoax believers??
or are you in denial??

a reply to: bobbypurify

I believe US went to the moon and then was told by aliens don't come here no more

Go home NASA you are drunk lol

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
If you are the top doctor at NASA, how do you miss this?

was mattingly on board Apollo 13??

no?? so how does this prove the hoax theories??

a reply to: choos
i dont get what this has to do with

the propagandists & their associates have amassed and/or compromised vast sums of "creatively acquired" apollo paraphernalia & have vested financial interests in obstructing the hoax disclosure that would indubitably undermine their heavily leveraged equity/integrity...



Lunar Module Telescope Assembly

a reply to: Misinformation

Seriously, do you actually think your word salads make you sound intelligent? They absolutely don't, they're just gibberish.

Now, how about explaining the relevance of your post to anything.

a reply to: onebigmonkey
they're just gibberish.

objection is invalid, this is properly admitted evidence

furthermore, all entities shall disregard any additional improper propagandists fallacies ...

this thread will now proceed foward ...

originally posted by: Misinformation

a reply to: onebigmonkey
they're just gibberish.

objection is invalid, this is properly admitted evidence

properly admitted evidence?? evidence that some Apollo astronauts took souvenirs from the actual missions??

the only thing that proves is that the astronauts took souvenirs from the actual missions..

still no indication of the moon landing hoax..

p.s. why is it that moon hoax believers still continue to dismiss the notion that prominent hoax theorists are not shills paid to spread misinformation? here i thought moon hoax believers claimed to be free thinking open minded thinking out of the box types..

a reply to: choos

the propagandists are the ones who started this whole idea that since certain Individual hoax theorists were profiting from their theories that it somehow discredits them,, yet when pointed out certain Individual propagandists are profiting selling souvenirs/books/movies based on the official theory they are given commendations....

i submit that based upon the propagandists fallacy argument , the Hoax Theory is correct & true - since the propagandists have far outprofited the moon hoax theorists on a vast scale....

the real money has been followed & it leads directly too propagandists ...

a reply to: Misinformation

how is selling souvenirs the same as selling movies or books??

a souvenir that was in the actual mission, as opposed to a movie which is a retelling of a story and a book which is a retelling of a story??

the souvenir is the genuine article, it took part in the actual mission a movie or book is "second hand" and the source of hoax theory books and movies are from people not even involved.

the souvenirs the astronauts were selling are genuine samples and do hold up to scrutiny.. moon hoax theory books and movies dont in any way or form.. they often break the laws of physics.
why would they propagate such irrational beliefs??

the least hoax theorists could do is stay within the realms of reality.

since they do not, they are clearly trying to spread misinformation.

compared with astronauts selling souvenirs, those are genuine articles, they were taken from the actual missions they will do as they were built to do. they do not break the laws of physics they also compliment what was recorded in the missions.

if you want to compare what the astronauts are doing to what hoax theorists are doing, you are trying to prove that the souvenirs are not what they are, they were not part of the mission somehow.