It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: christophoros
Those are all blanket statements about a group of people. Such statements are notoriously racist when used in modern linguistics. I imagine it wouldn't be a far stretch of the imagination to assume that they are equally racist when used to describe ancient groups of people as well. The fact that you don't notice that is pretty interesting to me.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Look. I admitted in the OP that you are more than apt to call the people's actions in the bible a product of their times. I am trying to argue that bigoted actions exist in the Bible, we should recognize them for what they are, and either remove them or teach that these quotes aren't apt for our times. Stop letting Christians justify their hate because your religious forefathers did the same.
I'm an agnostic. Christians don't like listening to me, but if other Christians were to point these things out, maybe ya'll could reinvigorate membership to your religion outside of brainwashing 3rd world countries with missionaries.
Did "God" rape the Virgin Mary?
Luke 1:26-38 New American Standard Bible (NASB)
Jesus’ Birth Foretold 26 Now in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city in Galilee called Nazareth, 27 to a virgin [r]engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the [s]descendants of David; and the virgin’s name was [t]Mary. 28 And coming in, he said to her, “Greetings, favored one! The Lord [v]is with you.” 29 But she was very perplexed at this statement, and kept pondering what kind of salutation this was. 30 The angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; for you have found favor with God. 31 And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name Him Jesus. 32 He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; 33 and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.” 34 Mary said to the angel, “How [w]can this be, since I [x]am a virgin?” 35 The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the [y]holy Child shall be called the Son of God. 36 And behold, even your relative Elizabeth has also conceived a son in her old age; and [z]she who was called barren is now in her sixth month. 37 For [aa]nothing will be impossible with God.” 38 And Mary said, “Behold, the [ab]bondslave of the Lord; may it be done to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her.
I know as a fact Darwinism was used to justify the execution of Jews in death camps
no he didn't, but that would be a good point if Mary hadn't agreed to to be Jesus's mother.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: borntowatch
I know as a fact Darwinism was used to justify the execution of Jews in death camps
So? Christians will use anything to promote their scripture based bigotry, even science when it's convenient.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
no he didn't, but that would be a good point if Mary hadn't agreed to to be Jesus's mother.
Okay, so you contend that Mary consented to "sex" with the "God", who knocks her up. Doesn't that make her an adulteress and a fornicator? Isn't that what Jesus taught about marriage?
Did "God" rape the Virgin Mary?