It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's a frustrating, literally alienating place to be... we (who know as best we can some reality for UFOs,) know we experienced something remarkable, but have to continually debate with the people immersed in the consensus reality narrative that says "no, you were high, stupid, insane or mistaken"... sigh.
Heck, I've been three of those things at times... maybe all four!
originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: Scdfa I am aware of the lights over DC in 1952. None of them landed on the Whitehouse lawn in broad daylight except in a movie. My scenario is suggested as a way of telling the US population that "it was us all along and there is nothing to worry about."
Objects that outmaneuver there aircraft really aren't there? Wow this isn't going anywhere.I am done talking to you.
Just because you have seen bright lights in the sky, doesn't mean it's a UFO.
originally posted by: coastlinekid
a reply to: JadeStar
Either you trust the military or you don't.
Either you trust the government or you don't.
THAT statement alone is enough for one to think you are a disinfo agent...
95% of sightings turn out to be identified so that must mean that things get misidentified pretty often.
originally posted by: Aquariusdude
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Aquariusdude
Misidentifying enemy aircraft is not the same as witnessing aerial phenomenon that cannot be explained.Military pilots know very well what normal aircraft are capable of..
First you need to go read the link I provided. A misidentification is a misidentification. Its really not much of a stretch that seeing a light in the sky might be misidentified by pilots that are on amphetamines with a lack of sleep. 95% of sightings turn out to be identified so that must mean that things get misidentified pretty often. I don't know of any stats that show pilots being immune to misidentifying things.
Take note that these objects could not be shot down or outmaneuvered...
That means these things have the same thing in common with things that aren't really there.
Objects that outmaneuver there aircraft really aren't there? Wow this isn't going anywhere.I am done talking to you.
originally posted by: Scdfa
a reply to: dr1234
There are mountains of evidence of alien contact.
I hear this statistic tossed around casually by people who try to deny a UFO and alien connection. And it is often just accepted without being questioned.