It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Staroth
a reply to: Daedal
Well this LINK sure is interesting!
The five stores — two in Texas, one in California, one in Oklahoma, and another in Florida — were all closed on Monday without advance notice to shoppers or the thousands of affected employees. At each of the stores, the reason given for the closures — which are estimated to last upwards of six months — was problems with plumbing.
However, some local officials are questioning the veracity of this claim.
In Pico Rivera, CA, the City Manager tells CBS Los Angeles that he was blindsided by the closure, which affects more than 500 workers in the area. As of yesterday, he said that the city hadn’t received any permit requests from the store.
A Walmart plumbing technician, one of the 400 employees who could be out of work until the holidays, tells the station that the plumbing explanation lacks credibility.
“Even if they had to replace the whole sewer line, it wouldn’t take six months to replace a whole sewer line in that store,” he says.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: JRCrowley
As a former Wal-Mart manager, I can say with absolute certainty, that no, Wal-Mart does not employ their own "plumbing technicians", especially at the store level. All plumbing work is contracted out.
originally posted by: JRCrowley
The simple answer is usually the correct one, and the most simple answers revolve around money 99% of the time. Follow the money and you'll find your answers.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: JRCrowley
As a former Wal-Mart manager, I can say with absolute certainty, that no, Wal-Mart does not employ their own "plumbing technicians", especially at the store level. All plumbing work is contracted out.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
originally posted by: JRCrowley
The simple answer is usually the correct one, and the most simple answers revolve around money 99% of the time. Follow the money and you'll find your answers.
And that's exactly why I see a high probability for Walmart, beeing just as greedy as Walmart, and thus most def part in every aspect of this. At least if you ask them.
Lots of profit in every inch of one of them tunnels... as long as some Black Budget will come up for this, ya know - national security stuff, there would be no need to think twice about taking cashloads of money for having any part in this. Why should Walmart pay for any infrastructure to build up their emergency supply-chain-services, or whatever hell of a deal may be part of their trade here...
Which coincidentally confirms the rest of your posting as well, doesn't it?
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: JRCrowley
As a former Wal-Mart manager, I can say with absolute certainty, that no, Wal-Mart does not employ their own "plumbing technicians", especially at the store level. All plumbing work is contracted out.
Congrats for that "former" in your postition as Walmart-manager, by the way. hrhr. Hell of a time, eh?
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
originally posted by: JRCrowley
The simple answer is usually the correct one, and the most simple answers revolve around money 99% of the time. Follow the money and you'll find your answers.
And that's exactly why I see a high probability for Walmart, beeing just as greedy as Walmart, and thus most def part in every aspect of this. At least if you ask them.
Lots of profit in every inch of one of them tunnels... as long as some Black Budget will come up for this, ya know - national security stuff, there would be no need to think twice about taking cashloads of money for having any part in this. Why should Walmart pay for any infrastructure to build up their emergency supply-chain-services, or whatever hell of a deal may be part of their trade here...
Which coincidentally confirms the rest of your posting as well, doesn't it?
"A Walmart plumbing technician"
Sorry, but what the hell is that? Is this guy an employee of the store? Some kind of facilities guy? A private contractor who has done work in that store?
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: AgentSmith
You should check out the Greenbriar and in the UK the Burlington bunker. It's remarkable what you can do under people's noses without them noticing.
Both of these bunkers are in remote locations, well away from the prying eyes of the average citizen passing by or living in the area. In addition, Burlington was built within an existing quarry!
I get that people want to stretch the bounds of reason, but building a bunker on a private estate or in an existing quarry is absolutely nothing like building a "network" of tunnels underneath highly populated areas.
originally posted by: JRCrowley
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: JRCrowley
As a former Wal-Mart manager, I can say with absolute certainty, that no, Wal-Mart does not employ their own "plumbing technicians", especially at the store level. All plumbing work is contracted out.
Thank you. You've just confirmed that the opinions of that guy in the article are more likely to be useless.
originally posted by: smarterthanyou
The mass of rock or mineral remains the same but the volume decreases and the particle density increases, an example would be Sandstone into quartzite or limestone into marble over time with pressure and heat.
The scope is tremendous.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: AllenBishop
The scope is tremendous.
But it was on the internet and we all know whatever is on the internet it has to be true.
originally posted by: AllenBishop
Let's do some simple math here, folks.
A 14' diameter tunneling project costs around $12,500 per linear foot.
That's $66,000,000 per linear mile.
The scope is tremendous.
The amount of excavated materials would be staggering.
The amount of personnel needed would be gargantuan.
The amount of inter-agency/municpal involvement would be mind-boggling.
Also, the geotechnical study would be a monumental undertaking, in and of itself. The rock medium would have to be of a specific type that is soft enough to bore through, but be able to retain the structural suitability for not collapsing in on itself.
A project like some of you are suggesting would be the greatest, most expensive civil engineering feat in the history of mankind, pulled off by an incompetent government that can't even balance a checkbook, or negotiate a treaty. Get real.
Occam's razor, people.
What's disgusting is that I personally worked on one of specific sites mentioned back in 2004, but that's irrelevant, because I must not have been hip to the secret sauce.