The ‘BASALT FLOOR’ Giza Plateau Smoking Gun Evidence of LOST ANCIENT TECHNOLOGY

a reply to: Rocker2013

You are right, but you are just some ten or so threads late to the Facepalm Party

you could use a basalt chisel

a reply to: Mianeye

What? You'll take the impossible over the improbable because? egyptology??? that's what you're saying? lol

Jaden

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: tothetenthpower

I don't get why they'd carve images of stonemasons using stonemasons' tools but not carve images of alien visitors helping them?!

Major failure in logic there

Well maybe those people that showed up late didn't get the real story, but fashioned their own as to take credit for the greatest structures anyone had ever seen.

Maybe those stone masons we're making works less impressive on stone not as hard.

I really believe that there people would have been drawn to these monuments so what's to say these people we call the Egyptians weren't just self indulged megalomaniacs that were convinced of an idea they could pass on to the next world through the structure they found. All these carvings and heirogliphs could have been added later after people had been there for quite sometime, and the pyramids even longer.

If something like that is even remotely possible in would like to believe that it could have went down somehow like that.

Tell me am I crazy to think such things?

originally posted by: Woodcarver
I am an engineer/machinist, materials specialist. [...]

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
I also have Machining experience, among others. [...]

I have more machining experience than anyone.. so I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies.

a reply to: Pearj

Then share and take part?

OK I am just throwing this out for every1 interested to take a look, because it was totally overlooked a few pages ago, when somebody mentioned this name - Yousef Awyan.

Check out his videos on youtube. What do you all think?

www.youtube.com...

In this video he explains his views on some things especially regarding the age and how they could smooth the surface and some things regarding the writing. My belief is that he knows what he is talking about and he gives me filling of honesty in videos.

Basically he is saying that some stuff was there before and egyptians just used what was there and used buildings for their own purpose. Just like some of the suggestions from members here.

I really like what he was saying about the smoothing process and visible evidence for his assumption, which they somehow supposedly achieved not with tools but with fluid put together with alchemy. Visible drops at the bottom of stone are really implicating his theory.

a reply to: Masterjaden


Good thinking to. The first dynasty were mud brick guys out of Mesopotamia.

a reply to: Pearj

me too. Especially comments that are blanket statements of having more experience, knowing more, being aware of more truth than ANYONE without knowing who those anyones are...lol

Jaden

originally posted by: UniFinity
OK I am just throwing this out for every1 interested to take a look, because it was totally overlooked a few pages ago, when somebody mentioned this name - Yousef Awyan.

Check out his videos on youtube. What do you all think?

www.youtube.com...

In this video he explains his views on some things especially regarding the age and how they could smooth the surface and some things regarding the writing. My belief is that he knows what he is talking about and he gives me filling of honesty in videos.

Basically he is saying that some stuff was there before and egyptians just used what was there and used buildings for their own purpose. Just like some of the suggestions from members here.

I really like what he was saying about the smoothing process and visible evidence for his assumption, which they somehow supposedly achieved not with tools but with fluid put together with alchemy. Visible drops at the bottom of stone are really implicating his theory.

I'd say he needs to look into tin oxide well known even at that time used to polish granite and glaze pottery.cultures around the world discovered this long before the Egyptians and stone masons knew the technique which is still used today o might add.

come on now people. The Sphinx is the key to the whole thing. Th secret chamber in it would explain it all if they would actually release it.

originally posted by: AthlonSavage

The quartz in the sand and rock having very similar material properties ( crystalline structure) have the same hardness hardness. In comparison the copper material is relatively much weaker, and Therefore it will wear out at a significantly much faster rate than a mark will develop on the granite rock surface, as the saw goes back and forth.

The bolded portion above is simply wrong, as Denys Stocks has proven beyond any doubt by sawing granite himself in this way.

You apparently don't read links people provide.

Harte

originally posted by: Masterjaden

Well one reason would be stumbling onto the pyramids already created from centuries or thousands of years before and wanting to take credit for it to bolster their rule and place in history???

And disassembling them to write graffitti in sealed chambers?

Harte

originally posted by: Poofmander

Tell me am I crazy to think such things?

Thinking those things isn't crazy. It just shows you are uninformed.

Harte

originally posted by: skalla
a reply to: Rocker2013

You are right, but you are just some ten or so threads late to the Facepalm Party

Well fine you stay with your copper saws and chisels and I’ll pursue other avenues.

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: Masterjaden

Well one reason would be stumbling onto the pyramids already created from centuries or thousands of years before and wanting to take credit for it to bolster their rule and place in history???

And disassembling them to write graffitti in sealed chambers?

Harte

Well remember the rule of possession. Also if you move into a place arent you going to personalize it and decorate it? As for sealed chambers. think of it as a anchient safe.

Some people are so into their 'copper tool' theory, they just want to make it fit at any cost.
It's like cutting your toes off to fit a shoe.

Therein lies the problem. In order to prove that only simple copper tools were used, I need to see them being used as they were; meaning I'd like to see a group of people not only hewing the large stones from a quarry and send them up the Nile but then cutting them to size and heaving them up to place them.
Having a small group of men using one copper saw to make an incision and then claiming "That's how it was done because look, we made a cut" is pathetic to use as evidence.

- I'd like to time how long each task takes...with copper tools.

- I'd like to know how many copper tools were used on a daily basis and how long they lasted.

- I'd like to know how often the tools had to be renewed and how long it took to make one tool [from ore to usable].

- How many people were involved in just producing those copper tools?

- Where is that much copper from and who mined it?

- How long does it take to mine enough copper for one tool?

- Where are the copper mines, is copper abandoned in the area?


Furthermore humans usually do not come up with elaborate plans for something just for LoLs. Otherwise Neolithic men could have 'in principle' build the Titanic, only they knew it would be quite a 'pain in the ass'
We toy with the idea of building a space elevator...but not quite yet...because we know that we haven't quite got the capability as of today.

A far more elegant, simpler and believable solution would be to assume that they had just found a technique/tools/invention that was more than capable to live up to the task, which in turn inspired them to build something out of the ordinary and put that thing to good use.

A people that uses mathematical precision and is capable of building a structure such as the Great Pyramid is IMO quite capable to have invented something better than a puny copper saw to cut stones with. Believing that they didn't is just patronising to such great minds.

a reply to: Harte

Yes the reason is copper is softer and ironically the heat just imbeddes the sand into the blade meaning the more they use it the better it works.

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Harte

Yes the reason is copper is softer and ironically the heat just imbeddes the sand into the blade meaning the more they use it the better it works.

Exactly right, and if you need proof of the cutting power of sand, think of sand paper. The copper slabbing saw is just a medium to carry/move the sand, which is doing the real work of cutting.

again water + sunlight + tuning forks..