Kingdom Wants Nukes Now Too! And So It Begins...

In the Middle East, Obama and Kerry have just let the nuclear Genie out of the bottle...and good luck trying to stuff it back in.

Obama's unilateral caving to Iran on allowing it's acquisition of nuclear weapons, has now paved the way for a new M.E. nuclear arms race.

After Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt will be next,...and soon nuclear weapons in the Middle East will be as numerous as camels, haphazardly roaming throughout the Middle East.

Soon after, ISIS, A.Q., the Taliban, Hezbollah and Hamas will have their own little nukes...and they WILL be used!
This will be the Obama Administration's greatest legacy to the world: Impending nuclear death and destruction.

Saudi Arabia says it won't rule out building nuclear weapons

Saudi Arabia will not rule out building or acquiring nuclear weapons, the country’s ambassador to the United States has indicated.

Asked whether Saudi Arabia would ever build nuclear weapons in an interview with US news channel CNN, Adel Al-Jubeir said the subject was “not something we would discuss publicly”.

Pressed later on the subject he said: “This is not something that I can comment on, nor would I comment on.”

The ambassador’s reticence to rule out a military nuclear programme may reignite concerns that the autocratic monarchy has its eye on a nuclear arsenal.

Western intelligence agencies believe that the Saudi monarchy paid for up to 60% of Pakistan’s nuclear programme in return for the ability to buy warheads for itself at short notice, the Guardian newspaper reported in 2010.

In 2012 the Saudi Arabian government threatened to acquire nuclear weapons were neighbouring regional power Iran ever to do so.

“Politically, it would be completely unacceptable to have Iran with a nuclear capability and not the kingdom,” a senior Saudi source told The Times newspaper at the time.

The United States and other Western allies say a deal with Iran on its nuclear programme is possible. Iran denies it is building nuclear weapons.

www.independent.co.uk...

Everyone other than Obama seems to understand that Iranians are nut jobs and MAD does not apply when one side is crazy.

The IAEA will be busy soon.



as if they're not already

originally posted by: Edumakated
Everyone other than Obama seems to understand that Iranians are nut jobs and MAD does not apply when one side is crazy.

Obama's Iran Nuke Deal IS worse than M.A.D (Mutually Assured Destruction)....It's M.I.D. (Mutually INSURED Destruction)!

He got to 'fundamentally' change the US, AND the world.

Now there is keeping a campaign promise

This administration is a joke.

I don't care if people don't like Israel or not - we have an alliance with them and we have turned out backs on them. Alliances are made for security. Now I wonder how other countries we are allied with will view us?

Piss poor judgment from the Obama camp.

Not only them but our politicians have turned their backs on us.

If these countries get these weapons they will give them to terrorist organizations to the highest bidders.

We will see how much you Obama lovers are smiling once people start burning.

originally posted by: stosh64
He got to 'fundamentally' change the US, AND the world.

Now there is keeping a campaign promise

Not only that....But his true colors may be starting to come out! Why not? He knows he can't be president anymore, time to make the "changes" he really intended when he started as president? Gain some people's trust (some) and destroy everything to try and be supreme ruler? Or just a different agenda?? Not sure, but something with him rubbed me wrong since day 1 and it hasn't changed for me personally....Some sort of shadiness but can't pinpoint it...

a reply to: IAMTAT

Seems legit. Hell, while we're at it, let's just give everyone on earth a shiney new nuke. What could possibly go wrong?

Is it too late to leave the planet? I don't want to live here surrounded by this many idiots with nukes.

originally posted by: stosh64
He got to 'fundamentally' change the US, AND the world.

Now there is keeping a campaign promise

Nothing says 'Fundamental Change' like 'Nuclear Annihilation'!

a reply to: IAMTAT

Considering there's something left to change...

This kind of decisions only increases terrorism. Nukes in ME ( read: serious trouble ) they will eventually blow each others out.

The nations (and organizations like ISIS) with Sunni majorities are coming together.

Watch what happens when they really get organized.

Shi'ite Syria and Iraq will fall.

Iran will stand alone.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Methinks this could be all be solved amicably.

Instead of allowing Iran and co to develop their own nukes, how about the U.S donates a few of it's nukes as a peace offering? It's not like the brass are running short-they do have hundreds of them just laying around. And perhaps Russia could offer an olive branch to the U.S and match it's donations- after all those who donate will irradiate!

Overt sarcasm aside there is too many nukes already and it's a miracle that there hasn't been a nuclear war. Allowing any nation to produce nukes is reckless because it could only take a knee jerk reaction to kills millions or billions.

originally posted by: Edumakated
Everyone other than Obama seems to understand that Iranians are nut jobs and MAD does not apply when one side is crazy.

Cause your Sunni allies are so much better right?

Saudi Arabia are a becon of enlightenment to the world......

originally posted by: xuenchen
The nations (and organizations like ISIS) with Sunni majorities are coming together.

Watch what happens when they really get organized.

Shi'ite Syria and Iraq will fall.

Iran will stand alone.

Which is exactally why the Iranians feel the need to be involved in pushing back IS in Iraq and Syria,oh and supporting the houthis in Yemen.
Whoever wins is bad news for the western governments-IS or the Mullahs in Iran...great choice or what?

The future looks great doesn't it?

a reply to: IAMTAT

I'm still waiting for evidence Iran even has nukes


And no the word of Netchenyaho and neocons who brought us Iraq don't count.

a reply to: crazyewok

It doesn´t yet but is on the path receiving them... negotiations are rolling.
Link

The US will not allow Iran to have nukes for this reason. However, the US would prefer this be done by treaty instead a war wear thousands of more American will die, the price of oil will skyrocket, Afganistan will collapse from escaping Iranian forces will ally with old enemy Taliban and Pakistan will collapse not soon after as Iranian weapons and troops flood in to set up a new Afganistan/Pakistan territory that comes with its own nukes.

So anyone who does not think diplolmancy should be the first option should be the first person to sign up your family for the next 50 years of wars in the region.

The only ones who acheive peace through surrender are the winners in a fight, not the losers.
-beez

originally posted by: Edumakated
Everyone other than Obama seems to understand that Iranians are nut jobs and MAD does not apply when one side is crazy.

LOL You realize Saudi Arabia is far worse than Iran, right? Look up Wahabism. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are the two biggest sponsors of Wahabi terrorist groups. And it's Saudi Arabia that won't let women drive or go in public without a male guardian's supervision. I'd be waaaay more worried about Saudi Arabia having nukes than Iran. Just imagine Bandar Bush with nukes!