Russia threatens nuclear war with Denmark

a reply to: Nikola014

I have a feeling they are trying to paint Russia and Putin just like North Korea and Kim.

If the shoe fits!!! A duck is a duck and Putin is most definitely acting worse than Kim, as he has invaded and annexed land in not one but two sovereign nations with the same lame got to protect Russian speaking people crap.

a reply to: liteonit6969

No really? Just the video of the BUK anti-aircraft missile system being drove from Russia into Ukraine, then to the target area only to be seen again leaving with one less missile!!

Stop smoking the Putin crack pipe.

Run guilty party run.
www.youtube.com...


Here are all the BUK's seen leaving after the plane was shot down, but Putin says they were not there lol.
www.youtube.com...

Lets not forget the Russian rebels screaming that they had just shot down a Ukrainian plane, at that exact time in the same area!!

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

Funny you would show a covered up BUK system when the so called BUK system which supposedly brought down MH17 was first covered up during transport, but on the pictures after it not, and now a covered up BUK system again.

Putin is so worse, he protects people who want to helped by him when there has been a coup in their country...

One Year After Russia Annexed Crimea, Locals Prefer Moscow To Kiev

You do know smoking crack makes you paranoid ?...makes you wonder who is actually smoking it.

Russia only desires peace. Ask Georgia and Ukraine.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You`re right, both have been instigated by the US and have been ended by Russia, and with both it wasn`t what Russia wanted...it took you some time, but you finally have learned what went on.

originally posted by: mbkennel

originally posted by: victor7
Russia has every right to defend its security interests whenever or where ever they are threatened.

Why is US/NATO putting up BMDs all over to try to negate the Russian ICBMs. Such acts in process create all sorts of global tensions. This is equivalent to Russians putting up missiles in Cuba/

Were the Cuban missiles defensive interceptors against the US?

No.

That was nearly 50 years ago. Technologies have come a long way since then.

BMD's defensive missiles offer capabilities to negate Russia's offensive move. This after the initial attack has taken place on Russia and denying it a chance to retaliate.

Don't yap nonsense just for the argument's sake. No one will buy this offensive-defensive missile crap. Push the issue any further and we are sitting in the middle of a nuclear war.

Then you can argue as much as you want with radioactive dust spewing from the mouth.

Don't mess with kids LEGOs...............RUSSIA is REALLY ticked me off MESSIN with KIDS LEGOs..........A .....CALL....TO....END......RUSSIAN......DICKWADS.......Everyone Move on these RUSSIAN dicks.......THREATNING Lego's......No body threats Lego s for KIDS....

a reply to: Spacespider

Oh yeah,here we go. I believe this is a case of translating things wrongly,or however they please. I read this article earlier today,there was no nuclear threat. The Russians threatened to use their NUCLEAR SUBS,but not a nuclear weapon on Denmark. Either way, serious stuff. But not a nuclear war. The pressittutes got a hold of it and now instead of nuclear subs,they are subs with nuclear weapons, Got to love it.

originally posted by: victor7

originally posted by: mbkennel

originally posted by: victor7
Russia has every right to defend its security interests whenever or where ever they are threatened.

Why is US/NATO putting up BMDs all over to try to negate the Russian ICBMs. Such acts in process create all sorts of global tensions. This is equivalent to Russians putting up missiles in Cuba/

Were the Cuban missiles defensive interceptors against the US?

No.

That was nearly 50 years ago. Technologies have come a long way since then.

BMD's defensive missiles offer capabilities to negate Russia's offensive move. This after the initial attack has taken place on Russia and denying it a chance to retaliate.

Don't yap nonsense just for the argument's sake. No one will buy this offensive-defensive missile crap. Push the issue any further and we are sitting in the middle of a nuclear war.

Then you can argue as much as you want with radioactive dust spewing from the mouth.

This is funny your saying countries shouldn't protect themselves from Russia because it's not fair. It's like making police take off their bullet proof vests because the bad guys don't have them. Like all things in military tech you spend money to defeat it. Russia already claims to be designing super secret stealth ICBMS. I guess they dodge missiles and play the Russian national anthem. Either way because a country feels it needs protection from a neighbor is no reason for a countries government to threaten them. Though oddly Russia has a missile defence shield as well but it's ok for them to have one we get it.

This is nothing but a direct threat by Putin unless you want is to believe Putin just let's his diplomats dictate foreign policy??

a reply to: victor7

Then maybe Russia should invest in defense more and offense less, unless it's goal is to be aggressive.

originally posted by: mbkennel

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: noeltrotsky

Did you and NATO as well get the memo that there's no more of USSR? Why's there a need for anti-rocket system pointed against Russia? Damn, the west must be not telling us something! No more communism! Your democracy won! That's why the world has never been better!

Until Putin came along and decided to be an ass, it was.

From 1991 to 2001, USA and NATO unilaterally reduced forces a very large amount, without any treaty.

Not only that the US and West put out the red carpet for Russia. Creating a special Russia NATO council, inviting Russia into NATO, letting Russia join the G7 even though economicaly Russia was not near up to snuff. And then pulling most Canadian, UK and US forces out of Europe. The West was counting on Russia becoming a normal nation, and it was for bit. And then they got Putin and started going backwards.

a reply to: MrSpad

Russia NATO council was no biggee. Russia was never invited into NATO. G7 was the initiation of Germany and Italy not the US. During the first decade US was getting hammered in Iraq and Afghanistan and needed Russia's help to reduce its body count. Cutting forces in Europe was a cost measure as both Iraq and Afghanistan each were draining $10B a month from US budgets alone.

Quit posting lies and twisted facts.

Putin or no Putin, Kremlin knows the reality on the grounds and there would be little change in its policies.

originally posted by: victor7
a reply to: MrSpad

Cutting forces in Europe was a cost measure as both Iraq and Afghanistan each were draining $10B a month from US budgets alone.

The forces were cut between 1991 and 2001 per his source, BEFORE either of those. The only one lying is you.

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: elementalgrove

Ah yes the smell of doom porn in the morning will always get the neurons sparking .. lol Imagine one morning some elite living in Denmark wakes up and see's his beautiful estate and accumulated wealth in the cross hairs of the Russian Bear because some country across the pond thinks it's prudent to put a missile base there . I am fortunate to live in a place where the strategic value was fully spent 100 years ago .Now I am surrounded by people who are originally from some place else . nobody wants us now lol

I also lived in Phoenix, AZ, albeit briefly. Get out before it scorches your soul!

originally posted by: Dimithae
a reply to: Spacespider

Oh yeah,here we go. I believe this is a case of translating things wrongly,or however they please. I read this article earlier today,there was no nuclear threat. The Russians threatened to use their NUCLEAR SUBS,but not a nuclear weapon on Denmark. Either way, serious stuff. But not a nuclear war. The pressittutes got a hold of it and now instead of nuclear subs,they are subs with nuclear weapons, Got to love it.

Where does it say subs? Translasion is just fine, im Danish... And yes they threaten with nukes. Its all over the news, I dont care what part of the Danish State they nuke, Its still nuclear war if they do.

"I do not think that the Danes fully understand the consequences of what happens if Denmark joins the US-led missile defense. If this happens, the Danish warships targets for Russian nuclear missiles, "said Mikhail Vanin and continues:

a reply to: Spacespider

nobody said anything about a nuclear war you fear monger.

originally posted by: yeahsurexxx
a reply to: Spacespider

nobody said anything about a nuclear war you fear monger.

I am no monger

Here is what the russian ambas Said word by word.

"I do not think that the Danes fully understand the consequences of what happens if Denmark joins the US-led missile defense. If this happens, the Danish warships targets for Russian nuclear missiles, "said Mikhail Vanin and continues:

I feel like I'm living in Bizarro World.

Russia = Good
China = Good
Islam = Good and just misunderstood

USA = Bad, and bent on taking over the world
Israel = Bad and should be fed to the wolves

Missile Shield = a crime worth nuking over
Blatant threats bought and paid for in a country's media by a foreign power = Good and gets called "just stating the truth"


SMH

I really hope I wake up from this nightmare soon. I don't recognize the world anymore.

Probably time to find a good seat to watch the world burn from.

a reply to: dragonridr

I heard about the rebels being heard over radio etc and the Facebook idea and so on, all from the msm. Again where was this info. The same as the info about jets being in the area and following the plane. The info about the ukraiine forces having placed a buk missile system in the area and so on. The FACT is that there is too much disinformation to find out what really happened. But again this will more than likely go down in history as one step towards an all out war, with the Russians being the bad guys and the west coming to save the day.

Watching too many cowboy movies.

Stand back and remove yourself from taking sides, I am not taking Russia's side but it is clear that the west has been the aggressor over the last 5-10 years. Russia under threat is pushing back. Either way the ordinary man will suffer.

This isn't exactly an official statement by the Kremlin. Not exactly Russia threatening anyone. Just someone's opinion.