The Immortal Cabal Ruling Our Planet

a reply to: soficrow


Just go back into time, research symbols used on ancient coins, greek, rome ect and compare them to new coins......same dumbazzes.

originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: LewsTherinThelamon

Government does that. Not business.

I think you're missing the point.

Government IS corporations, and corporations ARE NOW governments. There is no line between the two anymore.

Governments (ie: politicians) are bought and paid for... they have been for several decades now.

And why has government gone in this direction ?

Because they realized the added bonus of having corporate allies enables them to bypass international laws and regulations that would normally tie the hands of government and limit their ability to achieve whatever agenda they're chasing after.

There are no foreign policy laws keeping corporations on a short leash anymore.

With governments and corporations working side by side, the world is now their oyster.

Its not "government Is Corporations"

Its Governments are actual corporations,

There is a web site for the company, Dunn & Bradstreet that lists the corporations of the world,

Australian government for example is a corporation or corporate entity like most other governments.

Correct there is no line in-between them any more as most governments are simple companies making money by governing nations.

I believe I have linked to the site before and it got deleted so chase it up and see what governments of the world are run as corporations.

The whole purpose to corporations is take away responsibility from those at the top, which in cases is OK and a wrong doing by someone shouldn't result in punishment of another or the leader or owner so in a way it works however it pushes those that work in the corporation to focus on making the corporation more money and when it comes to governing bodies sometimes loss of funds would result in better governing and more for the people in terms of living, however that goes against any companies working ethics, no company or corporation is out to loose but to gain.

Governments are simply companies that decide which group of people will get a hand out all at the same time knowing that others will be stiffed. Its usually some minority over another which is carefully examined to gain the most profit for the corporation long or short term.

The ones that get stiffed get promised to be seen soon/looked after in their issues brought up when time and money can be found that many times are not kept or just partially kept, this is done to keep division in nations internally, the media play their part to keep international division and the government play theirs to keep it internally.

Its all the old divide and control technique on grand scales both on international and national levels, it even goes smaller in to state all the way to local government.

The governing bodies cannot make everyone happy and if they could I suppose it would defeat the purpose of government once a system is devised to create happiness amongst the population, there needs to be division so the government can stand on both sides of he fence.

Get support from one side while the other side/s feel left out and then vice versa but not a two sided affair, there way more than two sides to any community so the government job really is "who are we F### over the least to make a gain" or sometimes its not the least that get F'ed over.

a reply to: olaru12
Thanks olaru. It is a conundrum. Needs some thought provoked.

a reply to: tetra50

Seems like you are halfway there:
So, the corporation was a method to provide that immortal system, by which we just spun a circle in time, instead of ever moving forward, supposedly while “they searched for the elusive “elixir of life.” “

Have they found that, and if they did, then what would happen? I am wondering. These are the questions that we now linger upon…..

Do you really think individual mortality is more relevant than an immortal global corporate government protected by an impenetrable tangle of international laws?


a reply to: 0bserver1

I think they could have written their own death certificate in the nearby future.. The answer IMO could be lying within the artificial intelligence..

Ah yes. There is always someone more powerful (stronger, richer, prettier). But must humanity always be defined as slaves to something? If so, why?

originally posted by: PrivilegedPeasant
a reply to: combatmaster
If everyone knows that the world population are slaves to big corp than I wouldn't have to argue it with almost everyone I come across. The truth is this site and the idea itself are a small minority. If we stopped talking about it all together our chances of ever changing it would be less than now.

S&

I did not realize how awesome this thread would be.

"Non GMO project verified", look for that green checkmark.

These corporations don't own us.

There's plenty of sources excluding those 20 mega psychopaths.

originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: soficrow


Just go back into time, research symbols used on ancient coins, greek, rome ect and compare them to new coins......same dumbazzes.

Exactamundo. The for and against it crowds deflect from the thread. Who are these guys that seem to run the planet making the same historical scenarios over and again, building it all up into huge empires and then burning it all to the ground, repeating this cycle of destruction over and over? How do we tell where they are? What Icons repeat through out history prevalent to a fault in all the major empires that ruin, conquer and enslave?

I love icons. For instance, heres one…

The obelisk

This symbol has been handed down throughout history, adorning all the highest civilizations , the largest being the one in Washington, today.

originally posted by: OOOOOO
Those corporation still don't come near touching the Rothschild's and their control threw their central banks.

Plus I'm sure if you looked, you would find that the Rothschild's are major share holders of these corporations, though it may not be found evident on the surface.

Very good! Exactly! Corporations are the new monarchies - immortal frontmen concealing the identities of those “behind the throne.” Corporations conceal their owners’ identities, and insulate, protect and preserve their wealth and power. You got it!

International corporate entities, along with the international laws established under “free” trade agreements, provide a level of protection never before possible for the world’s uber-wealthy.

…I too noted that key banks, especially the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), aren’t even on the list. Usually, the reason for exclusion is that these banks are privately owned, and their income is unknown. But BIS stocks are publicly traded so who knows - they probably hide their assets in subsidiaries - and in any event, they’re all still corporations.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) appears to be the prototype for corporate immortality:

The BIS was chartered in 1930 under an intergovernmental agreement with Germany, Belgium, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Japan, United States and Switzerland - and the agreement guaranteed immunity in all the contracting states under international law. Then the BIS went on to finance all sides of WWII, and to help the Nazis loot assets from occupied countries. There was a huge outcry, and the bank was supposed to be liquidated after the war - but President Truman and the Bristish government stepped in, suspended the BIS’ dissolution, and got the decision reversed in 1948. The BIS is now the central bank for central banks.

…The BIS was established on May 17, 1930, by an intergovernmental agreement by Germany, Belgium, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Japan, United States and Switzerland.[3][4]

…The BIS was constituted as having corporate existence in Switzerland on the basis of an agreement with Switzerland acting as headquarters state for the bank. It also enjoyed immunity in all the contracting states.

Between 1933 and 1945 the BIS board of directors included Walther Funk, a prominent Nazi official, and Emil Puhl, as well as Hermann Schmitz, the director of IG Farben and Baron von Schroeder, the owner of the J.H. Stein Bank.

As a result of allegations that the BIS had helped the Germans loot assets from occupied countries during World War II, the Bretton Woods Conference recommended the "liquidation of the Bank for International Settlements at the earliest possible moment".[6] ….

…the dissolution of the BIS was approved. However, the liquidation of the bank was never actually undertaken.

Somehow you failed to tie in those corporations to the families they are supposedly to stand in for. Corporations can be owned by anybody who buys the stock, of course some own more stock than others.

a reply to: intrptr

Its freaking hilarious isn't it? The Washington Monument hard on. Biggest on in the world yes. But no we aren't to suppose anything there. No certainly not.

Apparently these guys figured out long ago how to really run the world with wealth, coin, metal ect. How to set up and tear down, shift, divide, conquer by debt ect.

a reply to: Merinda

It strikes me as very possible that all the publicly recognized figures associated are generally front guys for the invisible ones.

originally posted by: soficrow

originally posted by: OOOOOO
Those corporation still don't come near touching the Rothschild's and their control threw their central banks.

Plus I'm sure if you looked, you would find that the Rothschild's are major share holders of these corporations, though it may not be found evident on the surface.

Very good! Exactly! Corporations are the new monarchies - immortal frontmen concealing the identities of those “behind the throne.” Corporations conceal their owners’ identities, and insulate, protect and preserve their wealth and power. You got it!

Crazy I just used the word "front" and in this context and hadn't even read your post. Thats bad man.

originally posted by: karl 12

originally posted by: nerbot

Unless we, the individuals, each do SOMETHING to resist the corporate world, however small, we are just easy pickings for being controlled.

What do you do?

Campaigning for corporations to stop being seen in the eyes of the law as 'just one person' would be a great start
See 2:20

Yes. Found this: AbolishCorporatePersonhoodNow.

originally posted by: SystemResistor
What they want is a globalised money system, they are at the level of power where they are able to look at the very mechanics of money itself! They can act like "overlords" and look at the scheme of things...

Yes. Check out my post on the next page - scroll down and check out the info on the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). ....The BIS is likely the prototype for legal corporate immortality - and despite clear infractions, is now the central bank for central banks. AND very much concerned with the global "money system."

What would you prefer, I dare ask, a socialist government, where the government really controls you,

How 'bout we take this beyond synthetic polarity? This is way more complicated -and interesting- than a simple "either or."

The human cabal that rules over all of us has already secured economic dominance over essentially all economies on the planet. As Kissinger aptly pointed out control food and water and you control the population. This is where the cabal is focused at the present time. The want to secure water and food dominance.
A population that perceives it has freedom is easily controlled. Personal liberty disappeared long before G.W (Dubya) coined the phrase "freedom fries", a euphanism for liberty that resonated with Boobus Americanus (the public). The same cabal effectively creates the illusion of of freedom through a convoluted system of "bread and circuses" for the population. They control history, the educational system, all media, and can spin whatever version of reality they want the public to embrace. Boobus Americanus believes only what the psychopathic talking head on CNN news tells him to believe. In the case of 9/11 media has more credibility than Newton's Gravitational laws of physics.
The fact that the majority of people subscribe to this ludicrous reality that unfolds on the media is beyond my comprehension. As an analogy to a parallel situation in US media, assume that Vlad Putin used his oil money to fund a radical group of Muslim insurgents in Canada (ISIS Canada inc.) to commit terrorist acts in Canada. Furthermore suppose he supplied them with arms and training through a third party proxies and guaranteed them protection. Imagine ISIS Canada Inc / PLC gained popular support in Quebec and merged with homegrown separatist groups like a resurrected FLQ and radicalized Quebec society rekindling a new more radical separatist movement. Suppose then, Quebec begins to forge an alliance with Russia and China and to defend the fledgling nation installs defensive missile positions along the US border to defend against attacks from radical states like "Mexico or other Latin nations." In this case do you think there would be a military response from the US and can you imagine how quickly would the response be. Think of the Cuban missile crisis in 1962. In this instance, the US navy was dropping precussion depth charges on nuclear equipped Soviet subs to try to get them to surface. Officers on one sub mistook this for an attempt to sink their sub. It was only on very cool headed Soviet officer in a group of three who prevented pushing the launch button that would have initiated WWIII.
Now put the shoe on the other foot. You have Victoria Nuland funding radical groups in Ukraine promoting the overthrow of a democratically elected gov't. You have "Crazy McCain encouraging the insurgents and after the overthrow and replacement with a non democratically elected government, the US was quick to recognize a non elected govenrment. Is this not another Quebec in Russia's back yard. Now you have NATO working to adopt Ukraine, sending in arms and specialists to help the Ukrainians protected themselves from insurgents in eastern Ukraine. In addition the IMF is busy extending loans that Ukraine will never be able to repay so that the globalists can later move in and take their resources. In addition NATO wants to install "defensive" missile positions closer to the Russia border to protect Europe from Iranian missile launches. Is this not analogous to Russia planting missile defense weapons along the Quebec Vermont New York border or Cuba.
Did the Media paint Kennedy as a Hitler for the Cuba blockade as Crazy McCain and Hillary are doing to Putin who in reality is practicing remarkable restraint as he is probed and provoked by the "Axis of Freedom". Putin who has an 85% approval rating from his constituent population is promoted as crazy while Obongo who has an approval rating south of 40 is portrayed as a cool level headed Nobel Peace Prize Commander in Chief by his media makeup artists.
The point I am trying to make here is that who from my generation could imagine that an entire population would loose it's critical thinking ability to the degree that they would subordinate critical thinking skills to the media. These elites have in their possession, beyond human abilities to manipulate and mislead entire populations of people. This program of indoctrination that will lead to the destruction of humanity is in the supernatural or alien realm.
Anyone at this point who does not believe that we are visited by extraterrestrial intelligences at this point is beyond naive. There are too many credible witnesses and whistleblowers. The US gov't quickly covers up any crash sites and denies the existence of UFO's. If the phenomena does not exist, why is so much information about UFO's classified, and why does aliens and UFO activity have a higher security clearance than nuclear weapons. Few remember that Pres. Truman publically stated that they are here.
These are the real controllers at the apex of the pyramid. The bankers and corporations are like the president; order takers or CEO's of the real corporation that rules all of us. The voting shareholders of that corporation are not of this planet. This is the real invisible hand behind the government as we think we know it..

originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Merinda

It strikes me as very possible that all the publicly recognized figures associated are generally front guys for the invisible ones.

&S


a reply to: InhaleExhale

Just spent too much time looking for the original "Act of 1871” on the memory.loc.gov website - not there, but here is what looks to be the main reference quoted all over the web. Is this what you're talking about?

The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871.” …..

….The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. ….

….In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES.

(As a result)….our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law — better known as the "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas", respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.

….The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. ….

I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation [see note]. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. …

Editor's note: Actually in the U.S. Code the term "United States" is said to have any of three meanings:

US CODE: Title 28,3002. Definitions

(15) "United States" means —
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

Also see: www.byronwine.com...




???

a reply to: SystemResistor


your post was remarkable in the pure academic sense....

but I have to interject a more worldly aspect about the manipulations of people, their attitudes, whatever,
and the economic engine which is both driving and leading us


the USA federal Reserve will have to raise the bond/treasury rates soon.... because too many European nations are hopping aboard the BRICS and the Russian/Chinese new finance and money system....
in direct opposition to the USA demand that they NOT sign up for the Eastern Model...
BUT STAY exclusively with the NY/London North Atlantic Financial Empire (of imperialism)

the USA Fed will likely raise rates in June of 2015 instead of the unspoken, forever delayed, planned ZIRP 0%-1/4%
which would have staved off collapse indefinitely.... so a rate hike will be tossed in a sack then mixed with other voodoo tactics and dumped on a duped public with few choices left to try to retain wealth/value

When a structure is rotten to its core

When its foundation is decayed and corrupted beyond repair

The only option is to tear it down, and start over.

originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: intrptr

Its freaking hilarious isn't it? The Washington Monument hard on. Biggest on in the world yes. But no we aren't to suppose anything there. No certainly not.

Apparently these guys figured out long ago how to really run the world with wealth, coin, metal ect. How to set up and tear down, shift, divide, conquer by debt ect.

Kind of in your face plain as day, isn't it? Like you said, people don't get it. When they say "we" they aren't talking about "we" the people, they mean themselves.

We are going to do this and we are going to do that, "change we can believe in".

originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Merinda

It strikes me as very possible that all the publicly recognized figures associated are generally front guys for the invisible ones.

I agree with that assessment. Like when the mob has to appear in court, they never speak, only their lawyers. Same with the smoke and mirror of politics and "front men".

Game show hosts, master of ceremonies, announcers, barkers, minions…

puppets all.

ETA: The real monsters will always hide behind the scenes.

a reply to: intrptr


then explain about Misters SOROS and Rickards' doing yeoman's effort to be vociferous and public

while also being the hidden-hand in many control-the-masses focused dealings

a reply to: St Udio

The Kochs too - but they're all paupers compared to the really big invisible guns who can hide their unimaginable wealth all over the world.