Chemtrails Event: Toronto, Canada - April 18 2015

Chemtrails, HAARP, and the "Full Spectrum Dominance" of Planet Earth

- A lecture / Q&A w.Elana Freeland

It’s no great secret any more.

In the 1950s, ‘60s and ’70s, our government conducted secret large-scale biological and chemical aerial spraying in programs like “Operation Large Area Coverage,” “Operation Dew,” and “Project 112.”

We are entering a Space Age, but not the kind President Kennedy originally envisioned. This Space Age is replacing resource wars and redefines planet earth as a “battle-space” in accordance with the military doctrine of “Full-Spectrum Dominance.”

Author Elana M. Freeland examines how chemtrails and ionospheric heaters like the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) in Alaska and elsewhere services a full-spectrum dominance. This “Revolution in Military Affairs” needs an atmospheric medium to assure wireless access to the bodies and brains of anyone on Earth—from heat-seeking missiles to a form of mind control.

How and why did these new technologies come about? The recent release of various NSA records have reminded us that “eyes in the sky” are tracking us as supercomputers record the phone calls, e-mails, internet posts, and even the brain frequencies of millions.

Elana M. Freeland sifts through the confusion surrounding chemtrails-versus-contrails and how extreme weather is being “Geo-engineered” to enrich disaster capitalists and intimidate nations. A deconstruction of Bernard J. Eastlund’s HAARP patent points to other covert agendas, such as a global Smart Grid infrastructure that enables access to every body and brain on Earth, a future that erases lines between human and machine, and Nano-biological hybrids that infest and harm human bodies.

It's real. It’s happening here.

Author/researcher Elana M. Freeland will be speaking at the University of Toronto - St. George Campus - Medical Sciences Bldg.
Lecture Hall 2158. Saturday April 18th 2015 7-10pm.

Conspiracy Culture Bookstore and Bye Bye Blue Sky present.

Full information can be found HERE

a reply to: fattyp

Chemtrails, HAARP, and the "Full Spectrum Dominance" of Planet Earth

I find it interesting that they are going to talk about something that is closed down...HAARP.

Seems she hits on every little part of the chemtrail conspiracy that has been debunked many times before.

It's real. It’s happening here.

No it isn't.

a reply to: fattyp

is this your site?
www.conspiracyculture.com...

a reply to: fattyp

Enjoy...

a reply to: network dude

is this your site?

Better yet...

Are you Elana Freeland?

I ask only because I am interested in some answers to questions nobody seems to be able to answer, but if not then never mind.

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: fattyp

Chemtrails, HAARP, and the "Full Spectrum Dominance" of Planet Earth

I find it interesting that they are going to talk about something that is closed down...HAARP.

Seems she hits on every little part of the chemtrail conspiracy that has been debunked many times before.

It's real. It’s happening here.

No it isn't.

You do realize simply declaring "contrail" doesn't actually debunk anything, right? Looks to me like this person has done some work on the subject. What's the harm in sharing it with interested parties?

originally posted by: Urantia1111

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: fattyp

Chemtrails, HAARP, and the "Full Spectrum Dominance" of Planet Earth

I find it interesting that they are going to talk about something that is closed down...HAARP.

Seems she hits on every little part of the chemtrail conspiracy that has been debunked many times before.

It's real. It’s happening here.

No it isn't.

You do realize simply declaring "contrail" doesn't actually debunk anything, right? Looks to me like this person has done some work on the subject. What's the harm in sharing it with interested parties?

LoL, if only that were true. Sadly, even the mere mention of chemtrails causes highly cancerous tunors to form on the souls of more than a few members on ATS.

a reply to: Urantia1111

You do realize simply declaring "contrail" doesn't actually debunk anything, right?

And just calling them chemtrails without any evidence to back the claim doesn't prove they exist now does it?

Looks to me like this person has done some work on the subject.

And with that research she supposedly found HAARP related to chemtrails...she may want to research that a bit more, because there is no relation with the two.

But feel free to show any evidence that may back her claims.

originally posted by: Urantia1111

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: fattyp

Chemtrails, HAARP, and the "Full Spectrum Dominance" of Planet Earth

I find it interesting that they are going to talk about something that is closed down...HAARP.

Seems she hits on every little part of the chemtrail conspiracy that has been debunked many times before.

It's real. It’s happening here.

No it isn't.

You do realize simply declaring "contrail" doesn't actually debunk anything, right? Looks to me like this person has done some work on the subject. What's the harm in sharing it with interested parties?

Actually, some real discussion without the usual attacks from both sides would be a super change.
Scenes we'd like to see.

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

I think the connection is that they're both a manipulation of the atmosphere that could potentially be harmful to people. I'm sure there will be evidence offered. Wouldn't be much of a presentation otherwise.

So what are you saying? That governments never intentionally expose their populations to dangerous experiments? Ok then.

a reply to: Urantia1111

I think the connection is that they're both a manipulation of the atmosphere that could potentially be harmful to people. I'm sure there will be evidence offered. Wouldn't be much of a presentation otherwise.

See the keywords here...I think.

Unless she has some groundbreaking evidence from someone who worked there she won't be showing anything that hasn't been debunked before.

I say that because if there was some new evidence to back the claim it would have been spewed on every chemtrail site on the net.

Most chemtrail presentations contain the same drivel as the one's before them, as I said there is no new evidence that she has that can prove HAARP and chemtrails are related to each other.

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

You really think anything can ever be truly "debunked"? Or is it just that info is presented which better fits your world view & level of comfort?

a reply to: Urantia1111

So what are you saying? That governments never intentionally expose their populations to dangerous experiments? Ok then.

If your talking about the experiments done during the Cold war then yes they weren't spraying anything that is considered harmful in the amount they used.

The panel, which looked at the toxicity of the compound and its components as well as exposure data collected by the military, said it was highly unlikely that people were exposed to significant levels of the most dangerous component, cadmium. In occupational studies and studies on animals, cadmium inhaled in high doses has been found to be a cause of lung cancer.

In most of the Army tests, people were exposed to such small amounts of the compound that they would have been likely to get higher doses of cadmium from environmental and industrial sources, the report said.

The Army Chemical Corps sprayed the compound in dispersion tests to determine how biological weapons might spread if used in various environments, seeking data both on how to use such weapons and on how to defend against them. Zinc cadmium sulfide was used because its particles are similar in size to those of biological agents, because it is fluorescent under ultraviolet light and easily detectable and because it was considered safe, the report said.

www.nytimes.com...

originally posted by: Urantia1111
So what are you saying? That governments never intentionally expose their populations to dangerous experiments? Ok then.

It's documented that many governments have done backhanded experiments over the years. I doubt anyone disputes that.
But that doesn't validate any theory by itself.

Before the discussion devolves, the point that never seems to be discussed is those white lines in the sky, according to science, are most likely just contrails. (based on scientific principal and the lack of verifiable hard evidence to the contrary)

Most would agree that the spraying is possible, the idea is plausible, and the government shouldn't be trusted.

I think the major anger comes from the disregarding of facts. On this side, we have to look at everything proposed as evidence in order to try like hell to find why it's wrong. (If we fail to do that, then logic dictates that it may not be wrong)

But all the things that explain why those white lines can exist as non threatening contrails seem to be ignored in favor of wanting the conspiracy to be real. Why can't the conspiracy be a possibility instead of claiming it's hard fact with no real evidence?

a reply to: Eunuchorn

You really think anything can ever be truly "debunked"? Or is it just that info is presented that better fits your world view & level of comfort?

When it comes to chemtrails and HAARP being related somehow then yes it can.

a reply to: network dude

People who *want* the conspiracy to be real are just as futilely caught up in the dogma of their stance as a denier. Both are playing right into TPTB hands.

@Tsurfer
Yes, I'm sure that Cold War example is the exact one he was thinking of, & the only example in history.

The army said so.

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Eunuchorn

You really think anything can ever be truly "debunked"? Or is it just that info is presented that better fits your world view & level of comfort?

When it comes to chemtrails and HAARP being related somehow then yes it can.

How long did you work at HAARP?

a reply to: network dude

Why can't the conspiracy be a possibility instead of claiming it's hard fact with no real evidence?

Evidence...that would be nice, but I don't think that will ever happen.

You know what evidence would do to those pushing chemtrails...cancel that gullible money train.

originally posted by: Eunuchorn
a reply to: network dude

People who *want* the conspiracy to be real are just as futilely caught up in the dogma of their stance as a denier. Both are playing right into TPTB hands.

But as a "denier", I have to accept that if I cannot find a way to debunk something, it's going to have to be considered as fact. Like Climate change. I sure would like to believe I'm right and man has nothing to do with it. But the facts sure do go against what I want.

someone who "knows" chemtrails are real, as opposed to 'thinks and wants' them to be real is the ones I worry about.