It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
Thanks MM for that info, I will look through that thread.
Is it possible he was told not to talk about the case soon after it happened, or if forced to talk told not to reveal too much, and as he got older cared less about the possible security breach ramifications and just told more and more of the whole story?
Plus, none of the others have said anything about possible inconsistencies, wouldn't they call him out if he was fabricating details?
originally posted by: NiZZiM
a reply to: mirageman
Radiation from a ufo....that's pretty darn apparent. And if a top secret base can't identify a craft with properties far more advanced then anything in existence, I'm sure to say that it was not of this planet. From the testimony and subsequent coverup it's only logical to assume something incredible happened and to ignore that is ignant lol
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: mirageman
Aren't they really only admitting that the DoD knew about a vehicle that was active near the base in 1980, and not at all admitting that it was a UFO?
Hypothetically, they could have been testing a small UAV, with exotic power and propulsion systems in that area which malfunctioned and had to land in the forest.
They seem to be acknowledging that this particular UAV emitted a radiation that was harmful to life...a nuclear based power system would also emit a harmful radiation.
Could the Rendlesham forest incident be a secret, and according to treaties and governmental rulings at the time, also a highly illegal test of military drone technology, powered by nuclear means?
This would explain the cover up and why the forest where this took place was immediately cut down to get rid of the residual radioactive evidence that would be on the trees where this UAV came down temporarily.
"the unidentified lights and beams I saw in Rendlesham Forest, were extraterrestrial in origin and that the security services of both the United States and England were and have been complicit in trying to subvert the significance of what occurred at Rendlesham by use of well-practiced methods of disinformation."
originally posted by: phinubian
a reply to: mirageman
Easily explained using Occam s Razor, this clearly was some super secret experiment, you have the RAF and USAF, always secretly working together, hmm... I vote there was no ET and that was some sort of joint project and the testing thereof.... no ET OK, but to theirs (governments) full advantage to keep people thinking this nonsense and keep you guessing when they use it scare masses of individuals at the appointed time.
The little green men are the most elusive and so are their crafts.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
...
Here is the deputy base Commander at the time, Colonel Charles I. Halt, in a press release of June 25, 2009:
"the unidentified lights and beams I saw in Rendlesham Forest, were extraterrestrial in origin and that the security services of both the United States and England were and have been complicit in trying to subvert the significance of what occurred at Rendlesham by use of well-practiced methods of disinformation."
Source
Although some people take issue with LMH, there is no question that Halt said the above.
On one side of the craft were symbols that measured about three inches high and two and a half feet across. These symbols were pictorial in design; the largest symbol was a triangle, which was centred in the middle of the others. They were etched into the surface of the craft. I put my hand on the craft, and it was warm to the touch. The surface was smooth, like glass, but it had the quality of metal, and I felt a constant low voltage running through my hand and moving to my mid-forearm……………. At that moment, I knew that this craft's technology was far, far above what we could ever engineer. When it took off, I felt alone, knowing now what John and I knew. Suddenly, there was no doubt. I realized that it was 100 percent certain that we are part of a larger community beyond the confines of our planet.
Source : www.tinyurl.com...
Bustinza asked under his breath. “Can you see them?' l saw their eyes and knew then that they definitely were not kids. All personnel seemed in a trance and just watched them. The glow had faded a bit so their features were easier to see. The one light then broke into three separate glowing cylinders, each containing what appeared to be a living creature. They were small, about three to four feet tall and somewhat ghostlike in appearance. They had large heads with cat like black eyes. I could not see other facial features. They were not human at all, but I was not frightened. Each was very bright almost silvery clothing. I could not see any life-support devices attached to the entities.”
Larry Warren – Left at East Gate (1997)
Source : www.tinyurl.com...
“….Airman Palmer and I stood there and talked about the light house in the background and thought it ridiculous that they would have mistaken that for a UFO over their heads. Later that evening when we had our sighting I will say this if it is a light house I saw then it uplifted off its base and flew over my head, directly over my head and then flew off to the south and went into the stars never to be seen again………”
“Again I can not speak for what those guys saw that night but the night I saw this craft it was perfectly over my head causing me to look up and craning my neck backwards...NOT a light house! I saw a structured craft of some sort with multiple colored lights.”
Source : www.abovetopsecret.com...
The statement is from an attorney and should be expected to accurate. Is it though? Frascogna is an associate of LMH and the 'citizen hearings on disclosure group.' This suggests, to me, that the statement itself is an interpretation by Frascogna that isn't at all the thinking of the VA. Without a release from the VA, we'll have to take his word for it.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
I think we should focus more on what people saw that can be corroborated with others, as opposed to those same people interpreting they saw.
For example, Penniston sounds credible up to the point of describing the craft and what it felt like, maybe describing some of the details, but loses credibility with the binary code descriptions and time travel explanations............
.....Left vehicle, proceeded on foot. Burroughs and I were approx. 15-20 meters apart and proceeding on a true east direction from logging road. The area in front of us was lighting up a 30 meter area. When we got within a 50 meter distance, the object was producing red and blue light. The blue light was steady and projecting under the object. It was up the area directly extending a meter or two out. At this point of positive identification I relayed to CSC, SSgt Coffey. A positing sighting of the object…1….Color of lights and that it was definitely mechanical in nature. This is the closest point that I was near the object at any point.
If you want to debunk VA, try your very best, which would also release the very tiny shadow in my mind.