It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LotToTell2
If these were cauldrons that now left Earth, it can only mean we are not worth protecting anymore.
originally posted by: LotToTell2
a reply to: ignorant_ape
Really
where do you see that, I don't see it
originally posted by: LotToTell2
I know of Russian cauldron weapons supposedly left by ancient aliens to protect earth from rocks from space, so that humanity doesn't get wiped out too quickly by random rock from space. Supposedly Tunguska explosion witnesses told of weapon fired meeting the incoming rock and exploding it in the atmosphere.
I know of Russian cauldron weapons
originally posted by: LotToTell2
a reply to: stosh64
Use ATS search and learn about cauldrons
Let me guess.
You argue that ET didn't reach earth.
You argue that conspiracies don't exist.
What are you doing on ATS then ?
Use ATS search and learn about cauldrons
originally posted by: LotToTell2
a reply to: ignorant_ape
How are you proving anything with that video and fancy words
I don't trust what you are telling me.
You honestly think you can tell me with authority these are natural formations that just appeared all over,
Something came out, how does gas escaping like methane produce an anomaly like that.
Thank you for your opinions which I can get from MSM media.
originally posted by: Foderalover
Hey, don't be mad at the OP because You missed the documentaries on the Cauldrons. I just know that sinkholes do not have dirt piled up around the rim, not in pics of the others. Although, I think the cauldrons were in a different spot, but it definitely doesn't look natural. There is enough proof of an object intercepting the latest Russian meteorite explosion because of car dash cams, even Russian scientists say that Tunguska had to be intercepted by a weapon.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Foderalover
Hey, don't be mad at the OP because You missed the documentaries on the Cauldrons. I just know that sinkholes do not have dirt piled up around the rim, not in pics of the others. Although, I think the cauldrons were in a different spot, but it definitely doesn't look natural. There is enough proof of an object intercepting the latest Russian meteorite explosion because of car dash cams, even Russian scientists say that Tunguska had to be intercepted by a weapon.
Seriously.....please cite an article by a real Russian scientist that says the meteorite was intercepted by a weapon. If they state that then it would HAVE to be in reference to an alien technology by them as well......
Tunguska was the same thing as Chelyabinsk....it exploded over land prior to impact and is very obvious this happened due to the pics from the area.
Please tell me what reason there would be to intercept a meteorite over an unpopulated area that was far from being any type of earth ender? Just for fun?
A more plausible explanation for their existence has now begun to emerge. According to the website LiveScience, some experts now believe the strange cavities may be a type of permafrost sinkhole.
A sinkhole is a depression or hole in the ground caused by some form of collapse of the surface layer. A number of enormous sinkholes opening up in residential neighbourhoods in the US have recently been in the headlines.
Speaking to LiveScience, Vladimir Romanovsky, a geophysicist at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, said in his view the sinkholes in Siberia were caused by water from melting permafrost or ice.