It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: gosseyn
Thanks guys, but please none of you has answered the question. Is there any solid written proof from that time on which the mainstream archaeology theory is based ? Surely there must have been some foreman or priest or any other observer of that time who has left some hieroglyphs, some text somewhere. Or am I wrong about the mainstream theory ?
originally posted by: perception8
There is evidence that the stones used to build the pyramids were laser cut.
originally posted by: perception8
There is evidence that the stones used to build the pyramids were laser cut. How could that be? Engineers have publicly admitted that even with todays technology if would be extremely difficult to rebuild the pyramids the same way. So if we can't really do it now, how did they do it 1000's of years ago? And the BS they taught us in school about using 1000's of slaves, ropes, and cut down trees is ridiculous. Each stone weighs 1000's of tons, and a pyramid was even build on the top of a mountain. There are a couple of documentaries on the subject (the pyramid code is one), and current day experts are all leaning towards aliens building or assisting in the building of the pyramids.
The pyramids being used as tombs was also all wrong. They didn't find any tombs in any of the Great Pyramids. The pyramids were use to generate some form of power or energy.
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
The Great Pyramid has among the most concrete proof there is it was built by Egyptians during the 4th dynasty, in the form of worker hieroglyphs buried within the structure that had been sealed off until the modern era.
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
a reply to: Mastronaut
As a poster above us said, "please stop asking us to do the work for you..." There are a multitude of sites and links that contain the information you requested, about the hieroglyphs in the shafts and the relieving chambers, that speak for themselves. If you want to contest their authenticity then post why you do or don't accept them. Of course that has been debated ad nauseam here and elsewhere...
In addition to those two specific examples of "written records" the OP asked about connecting the pyramids to Egyptians, there are other much more minor examples, such as papyri that contain quotas for stone from the quarries - for instance this from Pierre Tallet from the University of Paris-Sorbonne, and Gregory Marouard from the University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute; a papyrus "logbook" discovered in Wadi el-Jarf, belonging to an ancient Egyptian "inspector" named Merer who led a team of 200 men who inspected and tracked the shipment of stone from Tura to Giza for the construction of the Great Pyramid.
THE HARBOR OF KHUFU on the Red Sea Coast at Wadi al-Jarf, Egypt (NEA 77/1)
There are, as I mentioned, more examples of such writings, but I'm really too lazy to "prove" anything to you or anyone else not willing to put in the work to learn of these for themselves.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
Do they not teach things like basic history or physics in school anymore? The amount of people buying into some of these ludicrous theories just blows my mind...
originally posted by: perception8
There is evidence that the stones used to build the pyramids were laser cut. How could that be?
originally posted by: perception8 Engineers have publicly admitted that even with todays technology if would be extremely difficult to rebuild the pyramids the same way.
originally posted by: perception8So if we can't really do it now, how did they do it 1000's of years ago?
originally posted by: perception8And the BS they taught us in school about using 1000's of slaves, ropes, and cut down trees is ridiculous.
originally posted by: perception8 Each stone weighs 1000's of tons,
originally posted by: perception8 and a pyramid was even build on the top of a mountain.
originally posted by: perception8 There are a couple of documentaries on the subject (the pyramid code is one), and current day experts are all leaning towards aliens building or assisting in the building of the pyramids.
originally posted by: perception8
The pyramids being used as tombs was also all wrong. They didn't find any tombs in any of the Great Pyramids. The pyramids were use to generate some form of power or energy.
originally posted by: obscurepanda
a reply to: Harte
You're one of my favorite ATS members.
you would be wrong than the stones cut from around the sphinx were used in the construction of the pyramid complex.
originally posted by: infinityorder
originally posted by: stirling
The Sphinx is supposedly older than the pyamids at roughly 12 000 yrs give or take.....
But Pyramids exist all over the globe.....many I am sure may be dated as being older than now supposed.....
Yanagumi is ten to 1200 yrs old...built for giants ive heard...now sunk off Okinawa somewhere...
dwarkas temples may date back to sphinx age.....or maybe mohenjo daro....and the South American ruins are older than the peoples who inhabit the region....
I think all things point to a cataclysm around 12ooo yrs ago of some kind.....
Carl Munk is interesting.....
But but I don't get how the numbers get to relate to the degrees he says they do......
Like he says some number he derived and says it equates to a latitude or such...but how?
I believe you are right.
I believe there was an advanced culture prehistory ( for our civilization) and because of cataclysm, they either "left" died out or are us just minus the level of advancement they had achieved.
This much more believably explains many mysteries of the ancient world than the current model.
Which is ancient man could magic 20 ton stones hundreds of feet into the air and place them with absolute precision that we can't even match today.
Even in modern masonry ( 3 years experience for me) we don't even build with any factor of the precision with brick or block and mortar joints they achieved with stone on stone.
Imagine if we built buildings without mortar joints between the stone or blocks or bricks.....it would fall down in a strong wind.
Some if these ancient structures are pure genius.
Speaking if genius, I admit it is possible someone like da Vinci or Einstein came along and thought it all out.....but good god, the logistics alone if moving cutting finishing and precisely placing the stones of the great pyramid are beyond belief.
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
if the pyramids are so easy to make with our modern technology then whay hasn't anyone built one even a small replica. Answer because they are damn hard to build even with the use of our modern technology.