It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Punisher75
Yet Jesus says he is not. This isn't rocket science.
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: NihilistSanta
I didn't say noah didn't exist... I said the flood was a myth...
there isn't a shred of evidence that there was EVER a world wide flood...
IF the flood was local its possible... and "noah" did not gather two of every critter on the planet...
the whole thing falls apart when one looks into the details...
Its just a story... it might have some truth to it... but IF there is any, it certainly didn't happen how it is recorded...
So how do you know Noah existed? From the book is why. Why would Christ liken his 2nd coming to a time when Noah existed? What would be the significance of that statement if Noah merely existed with no importance? Like wise if all we have to do is seek and we will find why did he bother saying anything to anyone? or coming at all? Logic?
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Punisher75
And where did you get the notion that one is speaking allegorically and the other not? In your own head? Again, you're not reading it for what it says, you're reading it for what you want it to say.
originally posted by: NihilistSanta
a reply to: Akragon
First off I don't listen to preachers. Second you continue to contradict yourself with IF statements as IF you are unsure yourself. Apparently you are the only person who "gets" the hidden meaning. Who cares if the flood was global or localized now you are just trying to muddy the waters. I know the book and that is why I do not just pick the parts out that I want to agree with.
2 Peter 1:20 - "Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation."
Akragon the thread killer is here so this thread wont go anywhere. You can see his avatar in any thread that mentions the bible and its at that point it descends into chaos because we have to go over basics because every statement has to pass his personal understandings that contradict the book he gets his information from....
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Funny the name you chose for yourself, is how you see yourself indeed...
.but I know this is impossible and most delusional of you to believe of yourself...
for you are too dim witted for it to be true and seek to harm the path to enlightenment...
In and of yourself you are a walking talking contradiction and most likely suffer from psychosis...