It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
a reply to: intrptr
It's because a new report has just been released criticising the new council for there refusal to accept the original reports findings.
Have to admit though i dont know about the royal sex abuse scandal?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: eletheia
Or maybe a Pakistani Muslim Culture thing?
What point are you lot trying to make here?
That all Pakistanis or Muslims are paedophiles grooming white girls
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: Fermy
Your so productive.
Please find me a source that doesn't say "predominantly Asian" "mostly Asian" or "mainly Asian" and I'll accept it that they were all Asian.
Until then I'll go with what the many sources I've read have stated.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Was everyone who groomed these girls a Muslim?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
The ones charged yes...
That is a tiny percentage of those involved.
Some of the victims were Muslims yes, but they were predominantly white girls.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't find the race or religion of the predominant victims or abusers as important as the final outcome...
Which should be the harshest punishment for all involved so everyone who was abused (no matter their ethnicity or belief) gets full justice and closure.
He said: “Our recent cases have involved both female and male offenders and people from a wide range of different backgrounds including British, Pakistani and Roma Slovak.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: eletheia
What about those who were neither Asian or Muslim, even if in a smaller percentage bracket?
How does it help all the victims if we focus on the fact the attackers were predominantly/mainly/mostly Asian?