Operation Indigo Skyfold

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

To confuse everyone.

To spread disinformation, on purpose, to manifest an agenda.

The attempts to manifest the agenda go on for centuries. They just keep at it.

The agenda originates with individuals who believe themselves superior, by birth, to the rest of us.

And that, therefore, they should rule the planet.

There's even the expression "the noble lie."

That's their mindset.

a reply to: ConnectDots
Why do you believe ''chemtrails'' can't be part of that confusion?

It's the ''chemtrail'' believers and pushers that are confused, after all.

a reply to: ConnectDots

To confuse everyone.

To spread disinformation, on purpose, to manifest an agenda.

The attempts to manifest the agenda go on for centuries. They just keep at it.

The agenda originates with individuals who believe themselves superior, by birth, to the rest of us.

And that, therefore, they should rule the planet.

There's even the expression "the noble lie."

That's their mindset.

You really don't know do you...that's what I thought.

And exactly who is they you are talking about?

Saying what you think it's about isn't going to do it...

Here enjoy the read...

en.wikipedia.org...

And while your at it read the PDF for Agenda 21...it might help in your so called research.

sustainabledevelopment.un.org...

a reply to: ConnectDots

The agenda originates with individuals who believe themselves superior, by birth, to the rest of us.

Wrong.

Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.

sustainabledevelopment.un.org...

See what I said about your research...it really needs help.

a reply to: ConnectDots

To confuse everyone.

To spread disinformation, on purpose, to manifest an agenda.

Well here's another thought on that, if you believe that's happening then stop helping them. As they say, be the change you want to see.

originally posted by: ConnectDots
I'm still thinking about how David Keith fits in to all of this.

Perhaps he is controlled opposition to Dane Wigington.

But there is always the possibility that he is well-meaning, but confused, like many.

a reply to: ConnectDots

But there is always the possibility that he is well-meaning, but confused, like many.

Or he's a shyster that enjoys taking gullible peoples money for outright lies...like many if not all in the chemtrail hoax field.

a reply to: ConnectDots

Perhaps he is controlled opposition to Dane Wigington.

Fascinating. In what way does Keith oppose Wigington?

But there is always the possibility that he is well-meaning, but confused, like many.

Who is the ''he' in that?

a reply to: DenyObfuscation

By seeming to have a proposal of geoengineering to combat global warming/climate change, whereas Wigington talks about geoengineering as a big problem.

I believe it's been pointed out on this thread that Dane Wigington is ruining everything because David Keith's proposal is not being debated, and it's all Wigington's fault.

Meanwhile, the spraying is going on anyway, despite David Keith making it look as if this is a future possibility that he admits is like advocating for leprosy.

What a mess.

And the debate just keeps on keeping on, while the spraying, which has been going on for decades, continues.

This is where the Citizen Hearing on Disclosure is essential - to find out what's really going on - according to testimony of people who have been in a position to know - and who have come forward, with great courage, and deserve our respect.

The fact that the topic of that is UFOs and very advanced technology, rather than chemtrails, is irrelevant, because what can be learned is how the military operates, and how black projects are carried out.

Who is the ''he' in that?

David Keith

a reply to: ConnectDots

By seeming to have a proposal of geoengineering to combat global warming/climate change, whereas Wigington talks about geoengineering as a big problem.

So you're saying Keith's proposals are being used to divert attention away from the 'truth' Dane is spreading? Do I have that about right?

I believe it's been pointed out on this thread that Dane Wigington is ruining everything because David Keith's proposal is not being debated, and it's all Wigington's fault.

Try to have a real discussion on GE proposals from Keith and others and see what happens.

Meanwhile, the spraying is going on anyway,

You say that as if it's a fact. A fact for which there is no evidence.

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation

So you're saying Keith's proposals are being used to divert attention away from the 'truth' Dane is spreading? Do I have that about right?

Yes, with the caveat that if Keith is simply a confused, well-meaning person, then the scenario would be that due to the extreme secrecy surrounding black projects, and the culture of lies and manipulation in which we live, the goal of fooling the public is just happening naturally as events unfold.

Try to have a real discussion on GE proposals from Keith and others and see what happens.

Okay; I'll put that on my list of things to look into.

A larger priority for me right now is solving the mystery of "Sprayer 1" vs. "Sprayer 5" regarding allegations of deception from Wigington.

As in:

originally posted by: ConnectDots

But I just realized that it is ridiculous to brush off the discrepancy of Sprayer 1 for the Geoengineering Watch article vs. Sprayer 5 for the Educate Yourself article; therefore, perhaps I was wrong to suggest that it was a doctored photo to illustrate an article about government, the powers that be, and handwriting on the wall. My mistake.

Perhaps the Sprayer 1 sign was in reality inside a government aircraft; as in a commercial aircraft being put to an alternate use.

So, I’m going back to the drawing board.

And, following up on the mystery of the dead scientist.

You say that as if it's a fact. A fact for which there is no evidence.

Yes there is.

You just refuse to recognize it.

a reply to: ConnectDots

Yes, with the caveat that if Keith is simply a confused,

So the top geoengineering expert is just a simply confused on the topic...yet Dane Wigington know the truth about it...do you even understand what you said?

You just refuse to recognize it.

So exactly what is it and where is the proof it is happening as we speak?

a reply to: ConnectDots

Yes, with the caveat that if Keith is simply a confused, well-meaning person, then the scenario would be that due to the extreme secrecy surrounding black projects, and the culture of lies and manipulation in which we live, the goal of fooling the public is just happening naturally as events unfold.

Look into real GE. Until then you might not be able to realize how ridiculous that is.

A larger priority for me right now is solving the mystery of "Sprayer 1" vs. "Sprayer 5" regarding allegations of deception from Wigington.

Go ahead and major in the minors if you need to. No chemical spray other than water is capable of producing the clouds claimed to be ''chemtrails''. It really is that simple.

Yes there is.

You just refuse to recognize it.

Can't recognize what isn't there.

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
Until then you might not be able to realize how ridiculous that is.

You're making the claim; back it up!

As in, why is it ridiculous?

Share your expertise!

Can't recognize what isn't there.

Only in your mind.

a reply to: ConnectDots
It's so obvious that if you can't already see it then you're not going to understand or accept the explanation.

Not wasting the time.

a reply to: DenyObfuscation

You seem to find the time to ridicule profusely, though.

For example:

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation

I always feared the rest of her would succumb to the massive assault being waged by that forehead.



On a more serious note though, anyone who says ''I public speak for a living'' probably doesn't anymore.

a reply to: ConnectDots
Explaining something to you is a waste of time.

If you would put half as much effort into learning the reality of this ''chemtrail'' nonsense as you do irrationalizing evidence that might change.

My time, I'll waste it how I choose. That's all the time I have for your nonsense now.

a reply to: DenyObfuscation

Spoken like a closed mind.

But a mind that makes quite a few demands of others.

a reply to: ConnectDots
I'll apologize for that then. From now on I'll try to be more open minded to what I want to hear and what I want to hear only.

Imitation is flattering they say. You're welcome.

a reply to: DenyObfuscation

You do know that ridicule is a fallacy of reason, correct?

When you ridiculed Kristen Meghan you were making an irrational statement about her testimony, which was directly related to the question of whether or not there is a black project going on for geoengineering.

Her good work involving attention to detail was rewarded with being demonized and treated like a mental case. That is classic modus operandi of the minions serving the shadow government.