It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
You know common sense tells you that people who go missing are by human intervention, not by Reptiles who have travelled light years. The point im making is that the reptilian story is a convenient cover story. Im not suggesting hes part of a conspiracy to cover up, im suggesting his storys of reptiles are muddying the waters of common sense, where the origin of strange happenings will not be a reptilian it will be human.
No, just to be clear, research and study would tell you that Ickes theory centers around the reptilians being interdimensional parasites with shape shifting abilities who exist outside of human perception, not the reptilians being the abductors. The Greys are presumed the culprits for a percentage of abductions along with the U.S. military.
Why is the reptilian story a cover? Muddying the waters for what? Why can't he just be "adding on to the water" which already exists?
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
sigh! this is why he makes money with reptile theories, and make no mistake hes making a comfortable living from this stuff.
originally posted by: onequestion
Ok so when I first came into Icke's philosophy I immediately reject it. What stood out the most for me was the reptilian idea. Now fast forward nearly a decade later and I love his work. The idea of repitlians in the way that he uses doesn't even seem that far fetched to me now. There has been more traction lately to the elite pedophilia rings we and they have been talking about. I agree with his premise on the elite royal "blue" bloodlines, and almost everything he says actually now.
Heres a video where Icke is interviewed by Red Ice Radio where he talks about the perception deception. I reccomend you watch it, if for nothing other than perspective. I realize hes worth 10 million according to Celebrity Net Worth. Honestly I don't see a problem with making money off of good ideas. Im not totally against people using their ideas as a way to make money.
originally posted by: SprocketUK
As time goes on, have come to see more and more truth in what David Icke says.
I always git stuck on the reptilian thing, but as the bard said "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio..."
I don't buy the line that he's a charlatan or a money grubber or similar.
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: onequestion
I like him as well. And the world is run by snakes figuratively
speaking whether or not they shapeshift. So what does it matter?
A snake is true to it's nature either way. So in my mind why not
make shapeshifting reptoids out of 'em.
SnF