It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: peskyhumans
Sorry but it's the same thing as forcing a Christian baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding. If you expect Christian bakers to bake your gay wedding cakes then gay bakers better be able to bake Christian cakes for Christians.
Take your hypocrisy and suck it down.
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
But the baker is still discriminating, making a distinction, based on their own personal views. The other guy wasn't allowed to do that.
The customer here was trying to get the baker to decorate a cake in a manner that is obviously offensive to the baker personally. For the christian baker it was was no less offensive really than putting two men's name on a wedding cake or a figurine of two men.
originally posted by: Logarock
Again is it really the bakers place to discriminate against anyone?
So a guy gets trashed because he want to make cakes for heterosexuals only?
originally posted by: buster2010
Did what the man want written on the cake come from the bible? If not then he really can't say that the baker is discriminating against his religion. Just because the Christian faith is against homosexuality doesn't mean you say whatever you want about it and claim it's my religion.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
T&Cs T&Cs T&Cs T&Cs T&Cs T&Cs T&Cs T&Cs!!!
I must hold my digital tongue...
This shouldn't just be thrown out of Court...
There should be some sort of charge against the Christian who wanted the Hate Speech on the cake...
Saying that, I'd love it if they made the Cake...
Someone at that shoddy wedding would have to eat the word Homosexual!!!
That's the best I can do... Due to T&Cs!!!
originally posted by: NavyDoc
And that is the whole point of he exercise. What is good for the goose should be good for the gander.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: Logarock
Again is it really the bakers place to discriminate against anyone?
She didn't discriminate against anyone. Maybe you need to study the word and it's meaning. She doesn't do hateful slogans for ANYONE. It would only be discrimination if she did hateful stuff for some, but not for others.
So a guy gets trashed because he want to make cakes for heterosexuals only?
More like, "For bigots only". I'm heterosexual and that cake would NOT represent me.
Your arguments have been shot down one after another... How far will you go?
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
But the baker is still discriminating, making a distinction, based on their own personal views. The other guy wasn't allowed to do that.
The customer here was trying to get the baker to decorate a cake in a manner that is obviously offensive to the baker personally. For the christian baker it was was no less offensive really than putting two men's name on a wedding cake or a figurine of two men.
And that is the whole point of he exercise. What is good for the goose should be good for the gander.
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: buster2010
Did what the man want written on the cake come from the bible? If not then he really can't say that the baker is discriminating against his religion. Just because the Christian faith is against homosexuality doesn't mean you say whatever you want about it and claim it's my religion.
Well it was a private business proposition were the personal preferences of the persons providing service were brought to bear on the outcome in both cases.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: NavyDoc
And that is the whole point of he exercise. What is good for the goose should be good for the gander.
And if he'd asked for a cake, even with a positive message on it, he would have gotten it.
originally posted by: Logarock
Well see "bigots" in a case like this is no different than using the word "fag" to describe the customer. It really is.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
But the baker is still discriminating, making a distinction, based on their own personal views. The other guy wasn't allowed to do that.
The customer here was trying to get the baker to decorate a cake in a manner that is obviously offensive to the baker personally. For the christian baker it was was no less offensive really than putting two men's name on a wedding cake or a figurine of two men.
And that is the whole point of he exercise. What is good for the goose should be good for the gander.
Except that the point of this exercise is apparently what's good for the goose should be good for the .... alien on a space ship (i.e., apples/oranges). It WILL get thrown out of court.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: buster2010
Did what the man want written on the cake come from the bible? If not then he really can't say that the baker is discriminating against his religion. Just because the Christian faith is against homosexuality doesn't mean you say whatever you want about it and claim it's my religion.
Well it was a private business proposition were the personal preferences of the persons providing service were brought to bear on the outcome in both cases.
Just because it was a private business proposition doesn't mean the baker has to put hate speech on the cake the man wanted. Crying it's my religion doesn't give a person an automatic free pass on spreading hate.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
Oh, I don't doubt it will get thrown out of court, however, it just seems that some discrimination is okay in our society and some is not.