It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A judge has ruled that a florist who came under fire after refusing to provide flowers for a gay couple’s wedding can be personally sued and held liable by the Washington state attorney general’s office.
Barronelle Stutzman was first sued by Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson in 2013 after her shop, Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts, refused to provide service for a same-sex wedding; she cited her Christian faith as the reason for her decision.
“As attorney general, it is my job to enforce the laws of the state of Washington,” Ferguson said in a statement issued at the beginning of the legal ordeal. “Under the Consumer Protection Act, it is unlawful to discriminate against customers on the basis of sexual orientation.”
originally posted by: MotherAnimal
Who would've thought, a florist who didn't like gay men.
originally posted by: markosity1973
The gay couple should have just picked another florist. Suing and forcing her to provide service might prove your case, but it aint going to make her change her stupid headed attitude.
originally posted by: markosity1973
I just think f#$@ you and go elsewhere with my money.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
Attitudes may have to be forced in the beginning, but over time and multiple generations, those attitudes DO change.
We have had experience in this country on this type of thing.
originally posted by: Tardacus
a reply to: Metallicus
the florist isn`t being forced to participate in a gay wedding they are being forced to sell flowers that`s all.
if the florist was in the food service industry would it be ok for them to not serve food to gay people?
what about Christian car salesmen is it ok for them to not sell a car to gay people or to muslims or to anyone who isn`t a Christian?
if the flowers were able to speak and said that they are Christian flowers and they don`t want to participate in a gay wedding then I would say that they shouldn`t be forced to.
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Metallicus
As bad as it sounds, I would rather have a try than have more state involvement.
originally posted by: OneManArmy
originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
WHAT WOULD JESUS DO? WHAT IF JESUS WAS GAY?
What if the moon was made of cheese?
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: markosity1973
I just think f#$@ you and go elsewhere with my money.
I totally understand your position and I would probably do the same thing. But there are small towns ALL OVER this country that only have one florist or one bakery. I live in such a town. Not everyone can go down the block to the next florist. What should these people do? I ask that question in EVERY one of these threads and have never gotten an answer.