America snubs historic Paris rally

a reply to: neo96

It is my opinion that there was not enough time to properly secure the President's attendance and sending anyone else would have been a bigger snub by the way the Administration seems to think. Just my 2 cents.

a reply to: neo96

My guess is that Obama has been ordered to stand down any real strategic actions.

The bosses want Hillary or the 3rd Bush to take the helm and lead the US in the war of Armageddon

a reply to: neo96

Well, Putin wasn't there, but at least he had someone as high profile as lavrov take his place.

Obama could have at a minimum had his VP or Secretary of state with the leaders in that march if he didn't want to be there.

The fact that none were, should speak volumes to Americans and the free people of the world.

originally posted by: neo96

President Obama was missing in action today when world leaders linked arms to lead an anti-terrorism march of more than a million people in Paris.

First, who gives a crap...their problem they made it. He also missed the rally in protests of the whole village of 2000+ killed too.... I guess 11 Frenchmen are more important to make a stink about that one. France really doesn't support us very much so they can have all the marches they want, enjoy, but I don't care.

It could be that he's like the cop a couple of months from retirement , he doesn't want to go to dangerous places because he's seen the movie and knows what happens.

a reply to: gortex

Hence why I said I felt barry should have been there?
Go to page one in case you missed it

Again, the context of what I said was purely about there being an american presence.
So for the second time, context is important.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: infinityorder

So holder then.
He was there just not in the march.
Kerry was in India planning a trip for barry cause that is how it works when our pres travels, its not just hop on air force one and head out.

Actually I knew that, which is why I mentioned secdef, he was not busy that I know of.

Anyone in the cabinet in foreign relations would have worked for me.

I hate boner and macdonalds but would have settled for either of them even.

I would have settled for any topevel admin honestly, it seems an obvious snub to me.

Like isreals PM didnt have things to do.

Lime any of these leaders didnt have things to do.

And where was Bush on 9/11?
In the air flying with Air Force One escorted by jets to be safe.

-

Sure, leadership and support. But security is a real thing and putting the president in a place with hundreds of thousands of people on the street on short notice and right after extremists get called out to attack. Is rather quite stupid.

originally posted by: Flint2011
a reply to: neo96

It is my opinion that there was not enough time to properly secure the President's attendance and sending anyone else would have been a bigger snub by the way the Administration seems to think. Just my 2 cents.

Yea US president's need crazy security:
www.dailymail.co.uk... ion-security.html

Of course the president of the most free country needs the most security!
So yea that takes some planning, he just can't visit a country on short notice.

It is going to cost Brussels $10.4 million to host Barack Obama on his first presidential visit to the Belgian capital.
Even for the headquarters of the European Union and NATO the astronomical sum has raised eyebrows - especially as President Obama intends on spending only 24 hours in the historic city.
Bringing with him a personal diplomatic and security entourage of 900 people and three cargo planes carrying 45 vehicles, the visit is also being policed by 350 police and military on motorbikes to secure the president's routes to EU and NATO summits on Wednesday.


Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... ion-security.html#ixzz3OYoNB6Z9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

originally posted by: Flint2011
a reply to: neo96

It is my opinion that there was not enough time to properly secure the President's attendance and sending anyone else would have been a bigger snub by the way the Administration seems to think. Just my 2 cents.

Good point hadnt thought of that honestly.

a reply to: BlubberyConspiracy

GW invaded the 'wrong' two countries to kill terrorists.

Whereas the current guy in the oval office just can't bring himself to even CALL them terrorists.

And cuts, and runs from them..

Trades deserters for them.

That is when he's just not letting them go out right.

There are CLEAR differences between GW, and BO.

a reply to: infinityorder

That's definitely true, there would be much less of a risk for Muslim leaders than Mr.Obama.

originally posted by: Plugin

originally posted by: Flint2011
a reply to: neo96

It is my opinion that there was not enough time to properly secure the President's attendance and sending anyone else would have been a bigger snub by the way the Administration seems to think. Just my 2 cents.

Yea US president's need crazy security:
www.dailymail.co.uk... ion-security.html

Of course the president of the most free country needs the most security!

So yea that takes some planning, he just can't visit a country on short notice.

It is going to cost Brussels $10.4 million to host Barack Obama on his first presidential visit to the Belgian capital.
Even for the headquarters of the European Union and NATO the astronomical sum has raised eyebrows - especially as President Obama intends on spending only 24 hours in the historic city.
Bringing with him a personal diplomatic and security entourage of 900 people and three cargo planes carrying 45 vehicles, the visit is also being policed by 350 police and military on motorbikes to secure the president's routes to EU and NATO summits on Wednesday.


Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... ion-security.html#ixzz3OYoNB6Z9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

You are missing a very huge point here. The leader the worlds most powerful country in all aspects is a much more inviting target than 9 of the top 10.

I dont even like obama, he is the worst president of my nearly 40 year life, but he is the president. His security cant be left to chance.

The threat to obama is way higher than any other world leaders by far.

Even all those aranged there dont compare to him, he is the king on the chess board, the most important piece.

a reply to: infinityorder

Sure but there are reasons this is that way, because it's the biggest world police/empire building nation, so yea it's now the most hated country... And even american's hate their own president mostly it seems... wow.

your thread is more appropriate for my reply....

because I was citing the jihadi murderers in France and was pointing out that the attacks are in France today but is anticipated to become regular events in the USA as the Executive-Chief in the WH presses for more un-vetted radical Jihadists free and unhindered entry to these USA

re:

originally posted by: St Udio

a reply to: St Udio

Remember the infamous saying during the last administraton?

WE can fight it here or we can fight it there ?

The 'majority' has opted for the former not the latter.

And we have been fighting it here.

And so is the rest of the world that stuck their heads in the sands thinking it was only 'our' problem.

a reply to: neo96

What have we been fighting here?

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: neo96

What have we been fighting here?

factreal.wordpress.com...

60 Terrorist Plots Since 9/11: Continued Lessons in Domestic Counterterrorism

Here is an interesting article in (The Jewish Daily Forward)...

forward.com...

I personally feel...that it would have been great to see President Obama walking with the other world leaders in that march in France today.

originally posted by: caladonea
Here is an interesting article in (The Jewish Daily Forward)...

forward.com...

I personally feel...that it would have been great to see President Obama walking with the other world leaders in that march in France today.

So you can see a suicide attack?

Honestly, that is what you would have seen.

Obama and many other world leaders killed, this would have been the result.