Either 9/11 Was An Inside Job Or Complete Morons Ran Our Country

a reply to: defcon5

Ugh, did they change that mission statement yet?

originally posted by: jtrenthacker
I'm going with the morons theory.

I agree wholeheartedly.

Time to take the power back. If you're not in, you are the enemy. simple as that.

Morons ? No .But having someone who could act like one if need be could come in handy .oops ,made the wrong dissension . Inside Job ? Not necessarily but having key people on the inside of a covert operation could come in handy . What we end up with is suspicions that mike either way possible .911 has answers that could be known .But like any true real investigation it would have to be open and people taken to task . The evidence says people knew and took advantage ,especially with the money markets .That could include insurance policies and put options in the stock markets . Then there is the PNAC document with it "new Pearl Harbor" statement and evidence that there was a plan to over through multiple countries in 5 years . There are so many dots in the story and we can see a lot of the narrative that has and is playing out . Is there a secret Govt . in the USA ? Pater Dale Scott thinks so and there are others that might agree with him . If there is, then it is highly unlikely we will ever be able to hold them to account .That whole Pardon power the Pres has is their get out of Jail card .imo a reply to: Swills

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: stosh64

. Does it matter?

Not at all, was just curious if I missed something.
Carry on.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: jtrenthacker

Clearly Bush played that role well but I don't believe everyone in charge during the year of 2001 were all complete morons.

It's clear many warnings were blatantly ignored.

They weren't ignored, George Tenet at breakfast on 9/11, "Could this be that Bin Laden feller?" (he was having breakfast with reporters) That's a bit like telling the missus you were only giving this other woman mouth to mouth resuscitation when she catches you snogging someone else!
G.W.Bush, "We're gonna catch the 'folks' who did this"..not strictly a term of endearment but most often used as such, he never did anyway!
The dancing ...Mossads ringside seats!
Wile E. Coyote, ATTA who only wanted to fly a plane, and wasn't interested in landing one..

Failure to act on information is complicity. So the answer to the title's question has to be both.

originally posted by: aboutface
Failure to act on information is complicity. So the answer to the title's question has to be both.

Has to be!

How about holding people accountable. By force if necessary. I'm going to open up a business selling tar and feathers right down the street from the White House. Might as well capitalize on it. Let them eat my expletive deleted. Cake is too nice of a word.

Why not put Guantanamo back in action . Give them a chance to come clean or have a full experience of interrogation . a reply to: LOSTinAMERICA

Okay, I'll quit. It's just so frustrating. The wheels turn and the wheel is on a steady course to crashing. I guess I should be thankful for all the good times and what I have today. It isn't like the Warsaw ghetto yet. It would be nice to stop it before it does get that way though.

Are you implying that our born again believer in sky fairies failed to grasp the reality of a situation? Surely not.

Just look at the aftermath of 9/11. The stench of inside knowledge and coverup's are overwhelming imho.

The 9/11 (c)ommission report concluded:

The commission's final report was lengthy and based on extensive interviews and testimony. Its primary conclusion was that the failures of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation permitted the terrorist attacks to occur and that had these agencies acted more wisely and more aggressively, the attacks could potentially have been prevented.

Both Bush & Cheney did not testify under oath, why not ?
Not under oath

Pentagon videos still under wraps, no investigation into the apparent insider trading on 9/11, nada!
It was the guy in the cave. Why? Because they found a passport presumably belonging to one of the hijackers, that used to hang out with the caveguy. See the connection? Case closed!

But but..it was also that guy in Iraq too.. he did a little 9/11 didn't he?
The mere fact that somehow Iraq got involved in this too, is beyond comprehension. So should one stick to "complete morons"... hmm it's a tough one! ;-)

The spin and lies surrounding this event are apparent to many, sadly no real national investigations has gone into any of these atrocities. The show must go on...

originally posted by: kloejen
Pentagon videos still under wraps,

T

No they are not....

The spin and lies surrounding this event are apparent to many,

Especially the ones coming from truthers, like your statement above!

a reply to: kloejen

And Afgan had a little to do with it too.
# we got to them before we got to Iraq!

a reply to: Swills
I always love that video clip where Bush mocks holding a model airplane in his hands that will end up hitting the model WTC, just like he did in a top level meeting prior to 911. Bumbling Idiot.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: kloejen
Pentagon videos still under wraps,

T

No they are not....

Oh my bad. You are right, first they denied their presence then later they eventually admitted to them

2. In 2002, five frames of video were released that did nothing to clear up the confusion. The frames showed a blur that appeared too small to be a 757 followed by a large explosion and fireball. The government contended that no other video existed. But that lie didn’t last.

3. There were Freedom of Information Act requests for the surveillance video but they were denied. First, there were no tapes that corresponded to the requests, then there were but they couldn’t be released because of the legal case against Zaccarias Moussaoui, and finally they were deemed “exempt from disclosure” by the Department of Justice.

4. In 2006, more video was released from the same angle as the 2002 frames. This did nothing to prove that a 757 had hit the building, instead just adding to the controversy.

source
..which is just another mysterious way of handling things as a authority.
It took a FOIA for this info to be released.. why? If all the videos contained nothing, why not just release them ? End the speculations right there..?

The FOIA request is described here at 911myths...
source

a reply to: Yeahkeepwatchingme

I'm going with both.

Being one who is FED up! I'm going with both and then some.

actors playing morons,they were going of the script

Until the classified things become public,I very much doubt we could tell.
Have YOU SEEN what they call CAMOUFLAGE? One look a the UCPs would indicate SOMEONE is off.
Not to mention 2 factions of the same group putting on a little show say WE ARE DEMS OR REPUBS that ony a few seem to figure OUT.
It IS comforting KNOWING how screwed up I know them to be when I hear about martial law stuff however.