It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: narin
It's evolution, the universe has both masculine and feminine qualities. You're just fulfilling your sacred androgyne form. All the new generations to come will have this inherently built it. You are but transition beings going through growing pains to a more perfect form of evolution. Indeed Leonardo Da Vinci a man far ahead of his time painted himself as a woman (Mona Lisa). And many of the enlightened thinkers who drafted your country's constitution/ forefathers had long hair and looked sacred alchemy had taken place in their body and they had consecrated their sacred feminine, including Benjamin Franklin who ominously resembles the women of his era.
As for the women, as farfetched as HIVE mentality sounds, they are programmed worker bees. It's more obvious and evident in upper facets of government employment. Worker bees do not have genitals, they are stingy. That would explain women swearing off men after a certain point the programming reaches a point of no going back. Again this is all transition behaviour as evolution does not end here. It does go both ways and its a divine concept called "androgyny". I would expect someone with an angel as their display picture to know this OP.
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
The feminine qualities described in the op, are such an idealised unrealistic view of what a woman should be it's almost disturbing.
Women who dont meet up to this odd standard are not feminine and we've lost something?
i think a lot of those characteristics, may have been survival instinct for a weaker repressed women to gain favour in a masculine society. Thank goodnes women are no longer forced into and made to feel inadequate for not living up to such idealised "feminine valuees"
originally posted by: QueenofWeird
a reply to: Realtruth
Maybe see those females as.....persons.....
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
The feminine qualities described in the op, are such an idealised unrealistic view of what a woman should be it's almost disturbing.
Women who dont meet up to this odd standard are not feminine and we've lost something?
i think a lot of those characteristics, may have been survival instinct for a weaker repressed women to gain favour in a masculine society. Thank goodnes women are no longer forced into and made to feel inadequate for not living up to such idealised "feminine valuees"