French Magazine which portrayed Prophet 10 Dead in Office.

originally posted by: Iamschist

Since I specified radical Islamist what exactly do you have a problem with?

And don't call my logic stupid

No you didn't - you said ANYONE of the Islamic faith.
You said deporting radicals but refusing entry to ANY Muslim.

originally posted by: Iamschist


This is horrific. I am thinking they should start denying visa's and immigration from those of Islamic faith. They have had lots of trouble for the past few years over religious issues. The three responsible I hope will be caught and punished. Might consider deportation for those of radical ideology. France is a beautiful country, send them back to the sand.

So again I say with absolute certaintly :
Your logic is stupid AND offensive but then the two usually go hand in hand.

originally posted by: truckdriver42

originally posted by: stargatetravels

originally posted by: truckdriver42
a reply to: buster2010

For them to even question it not being a terrorist attack says volumes about this idiot in chief we have in office. The guy literately trembles at the thought of blaming Muslims for anything.

The Muslim in Chief needs to go back to the 3rd world where he belongs..

originally posted by: truckdriver42
Looks like we had a car bomb just went off in front of a French Synagogue as well. Any of you Obama worshipers want to weigh and let us layman know if this was a terrorist attack too?

You should like raving lunatic quite frankly.
You're on here blathering on and spewing agenda driven bile that really isn't related.

Whats not related? Obama refusing to allow his minions to call this what it was or a car bomb going off in front of a Synagogue. Reality is something seldom practiced by you Obama Worshipers..

Obama no doubt has more vile for innocent cops that were doing their jobs than his murdering terrorist pedophile buddies here.

The topic of this thread is a terrorist attack in Paris. Please go make a thread about the U.S. President if you wish, and post your comments on it, instead of spamming this one. Thanks.

a reply to: stargatetravels

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: OpinionatedB

Whaaaaaaaat?!

I might as well start condemning all religious folk who neglect to weed out and expose the extremists among their ranks. That includes Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Sikhs, and every other religious follower out there.

It is unreasonable to expect hundreds of millions of people to systematically condemn and speak out against every extreme action. It is even further unreasonable to condemn many millions of people for either being unable to, or unwilling to actively search out and destroy/expose extremists and terrorists.

The links i provided show that Muslims do condemn terrorist actions committed under the name of Islam.

So the terrorists, who killed people because they were expressing their freedom of expression, then win. Because France would then limit freedom of expression. So, they play right into the terrorists hands, embolden them to make ever greater attacks to anything they don't agree with, and the cycle continues.

Or you give the proverbial middle finger to the terrorists, and publish every single parody and satire this office produced in every possible venue.

a reply to: ScientificRailgun Freedom of speech or freedom of expression has it's own scope and limitations . The terrorist in this case were not using speech but expression to make a point .Should we not take into account how speech can convey something .There are legitimate reasons why speech has made it's way into western laws that put limitations on just how freely we can use it .Expression is also restricted by law as well .I personally restrict what I say even when I may be within the law to do so .It's about offending people and considering them . I say once again that this is a bad outcome but if we know that saying what ever we are legally allowed to do will cause some crazy to step forward and express his feelings no matter the consequences that might arise ,..well then so be it . If there is a lesson in this then maybe we as a society should look for rational ways to address it .

a reply to: OpinionatedB

Awesome - thanks for the link to more ignorance and stupidity, just what I wanted.




Maybe you two could start your own Hate-Site.
Call it, oh I don't know, STORMFRONT.
Oh wait, I think that's taken.

Sigh

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: truckdriver42
Flashback.. The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.. Obama..

In other words, he encourages the savage Muslim Terrorists..

Might as well Green Light more dear leader..

O for gods sake this has eff all to do with Obama!

Leave your stupid American partisan politics out of this.

In all fairness, when something goes wrong in other parts of the world the US is automatically blamed for it as well.

Of course this probably has nothing to do with Obama or the US. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and sometimes radical terrorists are just radical terrorists.

So your response to a terrorist attack by people who want to destroy freedom of speech, is to actually agree with them and advocate shutting up the press and social media?

Unbelievable. Please try to THINK before you post.

a reply to: th2356

I never suggested that the press should shut up, I said that certain footage be removed so that it doesn't inspire others to commit similar crimes.

I believe in the freedom of speech but I also believe that is a double edged sword.

originally posted by: the2ofusr1

So the terrorists, who killed people because they were expressing their freedom of expression, then win. Because France would then limit freedom of expression. So, they play right into the terrorists hands, embolden them to make ever greater attacks to anything they don't agree with, and the cycle continues.

Or you give the proverbial middle finger to the terrorists, and publish every single parody and satire this office produced in every possible venue.

a reply to: ScientificRailgun Freedom of speech or freedom of expression has it's own scope and limitations . The terrorist in this case were not using speech but expression to make a point .Should we not take into account how speech can convey something .There are legitimate reasons why speech has made it's way into western laws that put limitations on just how freely we can use it .Expression is also restricted by law as well .I personally restrict what I say even when I may be within the law to do so .It's about offending people and considering them . I say once again that this is a bad outcome but if we know that saying what ever we are legally allowed to do will cause some crazy to step forward and express his feelings no matter the consequences that might arise ,..well then so be it . If there is a lesson in this then maybe we as a society should look for rational ways to address it .

Sorry, I don't support your "hurting someone's feelings should be illegal" approach.

a reply to: daaskapital

Christians do it every day actually. Who but Christians are the Patriot Guard who stand guard at funerals that westboro may be protesting.

Christians do this all the time, stand against the extremists amongst them.

a reply to: stargatetravels

Two months ago I was Muslim.. its not like I don't know what I am speaking about. Its not like I didn't spend my time as a Muslim fighting extremism... practically alone...so few willing to stand with me.

I DO know exactly what I speak of actually.

a reply to: OpinionatedB

You were a Muslim before you turned Christian. What did you personally do to root out the terrorists in your community?

a reply to: stargatetravels

Given the years of trouble France has had starting with the covered head in school issue, I think it is the right of any sovereign country to decide who enters, legally at least. How would one determine political stance from an application for a visa? Immigration is a privilege.

Ok I will take your judgement and your offense.

originally posted by: TryAndStopTheFuture555
a reply to: Shiloh7

None of the extreme Islam stuff can be fixed until US government is destroyed.

Pretty bold statement, isn't it.

I can write 1000 pages but who other than NSA will read it, so I will make it simple.

Islam is 1500 years old, where were they in the 1940s, 50s 60s 70s

US government under strategist Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski created with the help of Saudis FIRST organized group of Mujaheddin in Afghanistan to fight the proxy war with Russians.

After that it just spiraled out of control, and Israel didn't help the matter either.

US government will be the end of us all. And maybe we deserve it because we don't see it.

WHO DO YOU THINK MADE ISIS POSSIBLE BY GIVING 500 MILLION DOLLARS OF US TAXPAYER MONEY TO SYRIAN REBELS.

THIS ISN'T EVEN A CONSPIRACY PEOPLE, THIS IS PUBLIC INFORMATION

Actually.... they have existed long before the US even existed. remember a little thing back in the dark ages when they invaded europe a bit? Islams not as old as christianity either. France has had alot of islamic attacks this year too it sems. maybe this time the french will run them out like the germans sympathizers?

As for the US being the end of us all remember there are many countries other than the US who are working toward humanitys demise.

a reply to: kaylaluv

Taught in the masjid Islam, worked with those who were being led into extremism and tried to get them away from those teachings and sheikhs. Did it every day for years and years. owned a website dedicated against extremism for a long time to teach that way too. In person, online.. myself and 5 others this is all we did.

Not sure if title is word play or not. But could mods or OP change Profit to Prophet??

Sorry to Negative Nancy here.

People are just people before they get desperate enough to engage in terrorism . We in the west have learned to grow more skin and not act out in unlawful ways .Some of these people come from differing cultures not by choice but by war .Even our own returning veterans have a hard time reentering society after a short time in those other cultures . a reply to: Domo1