It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: AlephBet
lol. Good one. So what do you think?
While speaking of the devil--- though, apparently this idiom would conflict Plato's rules of rhetorics in this occasion, since it would come in the wrong sequence, some of these strict rules of the Trivium I am sure vethumanbeing can extrapolate on, since they are briefly discussed in the codex so politely delivered by him in the post he made just above this here humble post.
Well, speaking of the devil, there is another name that has been hidden in fog in the Bible. The name mistranslated into Lucifer by Sir Bacon in his King James Version of the Booke of Isaiah. In the Hebrew the text reveals nothing relating to Lucifer or any other Roman deity for that matter. KJV's "Lucifer, son of the morning" is written in the Masoretic text: הילל בן שחר or Hillel ben Zohar. As in Hillel, the father of Talmud? And Zohar, the 20+ volumes of the knowledge of good and evil? I understand this can be hard to swallow, Lucifer sounds much more sinister than some ancient Jewish name, and Jesus apparently sounds much sexier than Hosannan ben David. So if we call the President of the USA Obama or Osama, does it really matter? I'd say yes, it matters volumes.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: AlephBet
lol. Good one. So what do you think?
While speaking of the devil--- though, apparently this idiom would conflict Plato's rules of rhetorics in this occasion, since it would come in the wrong sequence, some of these strict rules of the Trivium I am sure vethumanbeing can extrapolate on, since they are briefly discussed in the codex so politely delivered by him in the post he made just above this here humble post.
Well, speaking of the devil, there is another name that has been hidden in fog in the Bible. The name mistranslated into Lucifer by Sir Bacon in his King James Version of the Booke of Isaiah. In the Hebrew the text reveals nothing relating to Lucifer or any other Roman deity for that matter. KJV's "Lucifer, son of the morning" is written in the Masoretic text: הילל בן שחר or Hillel ben Zohar. As in Hillel, the father of Talmud? And Zohar, the 20+ volumes of the knowledge of good and evil? I understand this can be hard to swallow, Lucifer sounds much more sinister than some ancient Jewish name, and Jesus apparently sounds much sexier than Hosannan ben David. So if we call the President of the USA Obama or Osama, does it really matter? I'd say yes, it matters volumes.
Zohar. "IN THEORY NOT PRACTICE" should be written as his epitath on his tombstone.
VHB: Zohar. "IN THEORY NOT PRACTICE" should be written as his epitath on his tombstone.
Utnapisjtim: Are you threatening me again? Not very polite
originally posted by: arpgme
שחר is shahar not zohar. There is no z in there.
ש is "sh" not z.
ben David means son of David.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: Utnapisjtimoriginally posted by: veteranhumanbeing
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: AlephBet
VHB: Zohar. "IN THEORY NOT PRACTICE" should be written as his epitath on his tombstone.
Utnapisjtim: Are you threatening me again? Not very polite
????!
VHB: Zohar. "IN THEORY NOT PRACTICE" should be written as his epitath on his tombstone.
Utnapisjtim: Are you threatening me again? Not very polite
VHB: ????!
Utnapisjtim: See what happens?
originally posted by: WanDash
a reply to: vethumanbeing
Methinks Utnapisjtim may be a/k/a - pseudonym- superhero stage name - alterego - Jekyl's Hyde for Zohar...who doesn't want an epitaph...
...Or - could have meant something else.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Yes or what kind of surgery should I anticipate having; after this run in with Moriarty (Zohar + all pseudonyms obviously does not want to die or as a superhero construct has no awareness it is mortal).
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: vethumanbeing
THIS bollocks happens, sherlock:
Unless you notice, you just claimed to be Utnapisjtim. I don't like it when rednecks like yourself tamper with the evidence and play with the bbcode syntax. Those lines of texts are there to indicate which quote is the child of which parent. And before you start whining about Lot and his misfortune and you and your friend's little rubber ducks, I am referring to levels of parent-child hierarchy in things like database entries that you wilfully seek to disrupt and confuse with your editing. Leave the hierarchy intact or at least do it right if you want to change the order of quoted text. There. Sherlock.
VHB: Yes or what kind of surgery should I anticipate having; after this run in with Moriarty (Zohar + all pseudonyms obviously does not want to die or as a superhero construct has no awareness it is mortal).
WanDash: Precision Relational Database Design & Implementation Theory As it Relates to Discussion of Theoretical Constructs While Denying Ingorance
This is important.
Please be aware that...more effort is required... You are still...a wannabe until this has been perfected.
/sarc (Sarkhasmoff)