WIFI Radiation and other sources of radiation slowly killing us!!!!!!!!!

originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
a reply to: SpunGCake

I wouldn't be a bit surprised. I think they can affect us with frequencies by individually targeting people.

Frequencies of what? You DO understand that frequency isn't a proper noun, right? I can't throw a bucket of frequency at you. Frequency is an attribute of something else. And all it is is the number of times something repetitive happens per unit of time.

originally posted by: Aquariusdude
i find it strange that the hospital did not check my red blood cell count even though i asked them to?? i suspected i was suffering from anemia and took some iron and that made me feel much better! very very strange that hospital did not check my red blood cell count!! I think theres a conspiracy to kill us!!!!!

So, like I thought, you didn't have a blood count done. So you don't have a clue if you're anemic.

The hospital didn't do a cbc because you didn't need one.

originally posted by: Aquariusdude

check your iron levels asap!!! give blood!!!!!!! cabbage removes iron from the body!!!!! we don't need that much iron to live!!!

Iron, radiation, and cancer.

Didn't you just say you were anemic and were taking iron to repel the wi-fi death rays? Now it's don't take it and give blood?

I agree you probably don't need iron. You're also not anemic, and wi-fi isn't killing you.

a reply to: AgentShillington

What some of us are saying is that there is evidence accumulating which indicates that there may very well be deleterious effects due to RF, and that those effects may take years to develop (as in exposure to ionizing radiation), and that the exponential increase in use of RF devices could turn out to be very worrisome.

Personally, my laptop causes aches and pains, whether in my lap, or on my belly, or on my knee, or being held in hand, which ever body part is closest begins to ache within a few minutes. Had a Casio watch once that would cause arthralgia on whichever wrist it was worn around--magnetic field effect? I don't know, but I had to change watches.

The studies I have previously indicated are worrisome enough that larger and more thorough testing should be done. However, if a significant problem were to be found regarding health effects, it could cost several industries hundreds of billion$ in profits. Hence, there will be much effort to, and many shills for, keeping such studies from being done. And I believe you screen-name is probably indicative of your resemblance to those.

a reply to: Tusks

I understand -perfectly- what some of you are saying, but you don't seem to be what I am saying, and that was my entire point.

A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, and that's what you seem to have, a little bit of knowledge.

All of your anecdotes don't mean anything either, as the plural of anecdote is NOT data.

But sure, go ahead believing that you are important enough to warrant attention from dangerous corporations. Heck, go on believing that I am one of their agents, simply because I don't believe what you are saying and am trying to steer the conversation with logic. Because, you know, that's how it works, after all. These companies are so worried about claims made on a site that share space with "NWO aliens abducted my baby Bigfoot".

Man, this thread is funny, but it isn't the first time this nonsense has been posted. DNS poisoning? Deadly mobile phones?

If any of it was true, then how come we haven't all had brain tumours for the past 70 years? The reason I ask is that many of the old frequencies used by analogue TV are now being used by mobile phone services - it didn't kill us all then and isn't killing us now. For that simple reason alone, I call BS - I have many other reasons and I work in telecoms myself, so I few things, but that one will suffice.

a reply to: stumason

The old analog TV stations broadcast/transmitted at about 100KW (now about 1000KW).

Most of us before 1990 or so didn't have transmitters in our houses like we do today.

The intensity of the radiation is proportional to the power of the transmitter and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the transmitter.

A cellphone transmitting at 500mW (1/2 Watt) but only 1 inch from your brain has a much greater intensity than a 100 KW station 30 miles away(about 2 million inches).

a reply to: AgentShillington

One thing I have learned for certain is that people who are losing arguments often jump to insults and insinuation. Excellent and appropriate screen-name by the way. Did I mention that?

I developed schizophrenia in 1998 the same year they switched on the digital network and the same year 95 per cent of bees,butterflies and ladybirds disappeared...you bet the technology is unhealthy.

originally posted by: Tusks
a reply to: AgentShillington

One thing I have learned for certain is that people who are losing arguments often jump to insults and insinuation. Excellent and appropriate screen-name by the way. Did I mention that?

You mean like you are doing now?

If I have personally offended you by trying to remain logical, I do truly apologize.

a reply to: AgentShillington

I am not offended. Just hoping an intelligent man like yourself would get away from those kind of tactics.

But let's stop misdirecting the thread, Mr. AgentShillington

a reply to: Tusks

What exactly are you talking about? If I didn't offend you, then what exactly is your problem with what I said?

A couple of links regarding RF/EMF exposure:

This one is World Health Organization site. They realize there is potential for harm and that exposure to RF/EMF is increasing rapidly: www.who.int...

And this one from The Health Physics Society, a group of engineers and radiation safety specialist who recognize the dangers of RF: hps.org...

but similar to groups wanting to study adverse GMO effects, there's immensely powerful opposition to finding any problems with RF exposure.

a reply to: Tusks

The great thing about academic research in this field is that it doesn't really cost much to do. There are maybe thousands, but I would safely say hundreds, of studies on this going on in the States alone, with many more going on worldwide. Once a link is determined, if it ever happens, it will be impossible to denounce. I mean, even climate change deniers aren't looked at with any type of credibility anymore.

a reply to: AgentShillington

Don't underestimate the powers that have billions/trillions invested

GMO studies---Monsanto

Drug trials---multiple Big Pharma corps

Anthropogenic Global Warming---Al Gore and big Gov't.

Fluoridation---ALCOA initially

RF dangers---Apple, IBM, and multiple others

Universities are influenced by the big donors, and frequently the only studies that get published are the ones that are favorable to the financiers. And it's "publish or perish" for many. Truth is sometimes buried by the money.

originally posted by: Tusks
Universities are influenced by the big donors, and frequently the only studies that get published are the ones that are favorable to the financiers. And it's "publish or perish" for many. Truth is sometimes buried by the money.

You seem to be under the mistaken impression that all science and academia needs to be attached to a University. Crowdsourcing scientific advancement is gaining popularity in a massive way.

experiment.com...

No one needs to be beholden to corporate money anymore, and like I said, the experiments aren't that expensive.

originally posted by: Tusks
a reply to: AgentShillington

Don't underestimate the powers that have billions/trillions invested

GMO studies---Monsanto

Drug trials---multiple Big Pharma corps

Anthropogenic Global Warming---Al Gore and big Gov't.

Fluoridation---ALCOA initially

RF dangers---Apple, IBM, and multiple others

Universities are influenced by the big donors, and frequently the only studies that get published are the ones that are favorable to the financiers. And it's "publish or perish" for many. Truth is sometimes buried by the money.

Wow.
It's true.
There really are people who believe everything is a conspiracy.

a reply to: Pardon?

Crank magnetism

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Pardon?

And even more unbelievable, there are people who fail to understand that wherever Big Money is involved, there will be multiple parties conspiring to hide or mislabel studies. trials, or facts in order to make/keep more money. Please review the story of aspartame and Rumsfeld, Alcoa and fluoridation, or google "drug trial fraud".

originally posted by: khnum
I developed schizophrenia in 1998 the same year they switched on the digital network and the same year 95 per cent of bees,butterflies and ladybirds disappeared...you bet the technology is unhealthy.

alternative explanation : you develop schizophrenia, probably for genetic reasons , which causes sufferers to have paranoia and other false beliefs like "95 per cent of bees,butterflies and Ladybirds disappeared" , which is not true ...

August 2009 Ladybird invasion:
Population explosion sees millions of bugs descend on UK

www.dailymail.co.uk...

[ ladybird populations naturally crash then explode in a cyclical fashion ...

]