Bill Clinton could be Hillary's Vice President and running mate

Bill Clinton could be Hillary's Vice President. You can be president for 10 years total. You can only be elected for 2 terms as President so theoretically he could be Hillary's running mate and be our President again for 2 years if for some reason Hillary could not continue as President.

How Many Years Can Someone Be President?

What do you make of that!

Sadly a communist( Hillary) and a two bit lying whore ( Slick Willie ) may be what this country has come to.

If this is what we put into the Whitehouse in 2016 then as free Americans, we truly deserve what we get .

a reply to: Xeven

I know you are posing a hypothetical, but I was enjoying my evening meal when I perused your thread title...

Just say NO!!

originally posted by: Battleline
Sadly a communist( Hillary) and a two bit lying whore ( Slick Willie ) may be what this country has come to.

If this is what we put into the Whitehouse in 2016 then as free Americans, we truly deserve what we get .

Agreed.

I would like to say it will never happen but I have no faith in the intelligence of the people voting anymore.

a reply to: Xeven

The 90's ruled. Let's do it again!

a reply to: Xeven

So they run and win, Bill knocks off Hillary in a secret coup and he could be prez? That would make a great movie.

Yeah, I suppose it is possible.

One of them would have to move from New York, ala Dick Cheney switching from Texas back to Wyoming prior to running with GWB. I believe the 12 Amendment is what governs that, making it illegal for a state to cast their electroial votes to both Pres and VP candidates if both are residents of said state. (In other words, Congress would have to approve New York's electorial votes first.) There is also a precident regarding to president and VP traveling together and residing together. I'm gonna guess Hillary has no desire to see the DC Naval Observatory house turned into Slick Willie's Man Cave and Shag Pad.

Yes keep it in the family !

This is the godfathers way even if the Clinton's are better than the Bush's

Democracy is that what they call it when you get to vote for the head of a two headed snake every few years.

And then Jeb Bush Runs with George as his VP. LOL

Think of the possibilities!

a reply to: mwood
Caring intelligence is for sure lacking but the base that the Dem's have built is the real problem.

The new movement is legalizing pot, they said in Nevada if POT is put on the ballot you have the 18 to 40 crowd out in droves and as long as your there vote for the people that support legalized pot, the Dem's.

You do this in a majority of states and you win hands down, the Dem's could run BOZO and win...think about it.

OK. If the Prez kicks it, the Vice is Prez. If the Vice already served 2 terms he's ineligible to be Vice because of the possible outcome. But that's only logic. Not necessarily applicable to Wash.

originally posted by: amazing
And then Jeb Bush Runs with George as his VP. LOL

Too soon, man, too soon.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: amazing
And then Jeb Bush Runs with George as his VP. LOL

Too soon, man, too soon.

Yeah. I'd kinda like someone new. Not named Clinton or Bush. Someone new.

The most experienced and knowledgeable political leaders in America.

I would vote for this pairing.

originally posted by: Annee
The most experienced and knowledgeable political leaders in America.

I would vote for this pairing.

It's good to have an outsider. Someone different. I know from experience, having held office in Oregon. When you're in too long you get institutional and get caught up in all the games.

Obama, being an outsider wasn't the issue it would have been a divisive presidential term no matter what Democrat would have won. We don't need more of the same, we need something totally different.

Clinton himself said in repsonse to whether he could be Vice-President:

I don't believe so. There are some people who believe it can, and they have contorted readings of the amendment, the 22nd Amendment. But I believe as a matter of general interpretation, you're supposed to read all the Constitution including all the Amendments as if they were written almost on the same day at the same moment, so they're consistent with one another. And the Constitution says the qualifications for Vice President are the same as those for President. Now you can read that to mean 'to serve,' not 'to run for.' But I just don't believe it's consistent with the spirit of the Constitution for someone who's been President twice to be elected Vice President. I just don't think it's Constitutional. I don't think it's right and I wouldn't want to do that. I'd want to do whatever I could do to be of highest and best use for her, but there are lots of wonderful people out there, including all the people that are running this time would be good Vice Presidents. And, that's just not in the cards.

originally posted by: Annee
The most experienced and knowledgeable political leaders in America.

I would vote for this pairing.

Ah yes.

High moral values.

Strong successful family values.

Pillars of failure.

Perfect candidates.

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: Annee
The most experienced and knowledgeable political leaders in America.

I would vote for this pairing.

It's good to have an outsider. Someone different. I know from experience, having held office in Oregon. When you're in too long you get institutional and get caught up in all the games.

Obama, being an outsider wasn't the issue it would have been a divisive presidential term no matter what Democrat would have won. We don't need more of the same, we need something totally different.

Maybe, but I see the goalposts moved.

International knowledge and experience is the key. Both Hill and Bill have that.

The key would be in surrounding yourself with intellect and diversity. Definitely not "Yes people".

I actually liked Bill Clinton until he couldn't man up to boinking his intern but had the balls to lie straight into the eyes of the American citizens. I lost all respect for him at that point. Then after learning of all the people who died suspiciously at (most likely their requests) I lost respect for them both.

We need someone honest, someone who has backbone and says what they mean and means what they say. Someone who cares about the people, the country and the environment and isn't in it for personal gain.

Quite frankly, I doubt if there's anyone out there like that.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee
The most experienced and knowledgeable political leaders in America.

I would vote for this pairing.

Ah yes.

High moral values.

Strong successful family values.

Pillars of failure.

Perfect candidates.

Failure? What would that be exactly?

Seems to me they have been very successful in parenting.

The moral argument? Oh, screw that! Most over used and abused word during the Bush years, to the point it's lost any value.