It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: michaelbrux
I think i'm going to go ahead and try this route.
we are talking about the evolutionary process...Model it...you say it exists...draw us all a picture of what it looks like...even a dimwit like myself can appreciate a pretty picture.
i'll even say...it doesn't have to be closed...use arrows that direct me to a sub-process you haven't reconciled into the macro process.
originally posted by: michaelbrux
a reply to: Noinden
i'm certain my understanding of Genetics is Profound.
if more than one person says so it must be true.
i'm just waiting for my closed model of the evolutionary process.
and for good measure...show me where you proved that it is correct. since you decided to chime in.
after a dozen or so years of reading this specific type of thread on the internet...the only conclusion I can draw is that modern proponents of Evolution desire a blind acceptance by the masses that Copernicus never expected.
you've got a long fight...and no, I don't feel bad about it. ...I won't read endless articles so as to prove you right in my own mind and other assorted b.s.
prove on your own that Evolution deserves its place among the giants the old fashioned way....suffer and not experience any benefit in your own lifetime.
it is the only way.
originally posted by: michaelbrux
a reply to: Grimpachi
the solid science is why you are here arguing with someone that isn't all they believe themselves to be.
and who's probably been drinking the whole time.
seriously...you need to raise your game, solid science.