It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Crisis
What I love most about Lazar is how he has said that 1 of the main reasons he has stayed away from the topic of UFOs & prefers people DON'T believe his experiences is because there are way too many debunkers that claim to know more about his life & qualifications, than him. And what do you see in this very thread? Strangers that are claiming to know more about his life & qualifications than him. Go figure.
HE was the first one that revealed the disrepancies about his schooling & previous employment. It wasn't discovered after the fact, like most people claim. It was one of the main reasons for him coming out in the first place, because he thought "the next thing that will disappear might be me."
He has also stated that he hasn't revealed EVERYTHING, he's only talked about 95% of his experience. The remaining 5%, he keeps to himself, because if he is ever confronted by an individual(s) that claims to have worked at S4 at some point, there are certain things that ONLY those people will know, so when questioned by him, he will immediately know if they are telling the truth.
Dude is the real deal.
Along the way, Zvi, John Joseph and Henrik, thanks to the time-honored method of “just staring at” the loop integrand provided by unitarity, also stumbled on a new property of gauge theory amplitudes, which tightly couples them to gravity. They found that gauge theory amplitudes can be written in such a way that their kinematic part obeys relations that are structurally identical to the Jacobi identities known to fans of Lie algebras. This so-called color-kinematics duality, when achieved, leads to a simple “double copy” prescription for computing amplitudes in suitable theories of gravity: Take the gauge theory amplitude, remove the color factors and square the kinematic numerator factors. [bold]Crudely, a graviton looks very much like two gluons laid on top of each other.[/bold]
this cannot be reconciled with the view he is a hoaxer. it is too huge a thing for it to be coincidence. this trumps anything he said about element 115 because anyone with any scientific knowledge should be familiar with the idea of islands of stability. but no one back then had any clue that this was even possible. no one. yet he stated matter of factly that the strong force and gravity are essentially the same thing.
originally posted by: wjgesq
a reply to: stormbringer1701
So, if Lazar was making all this up, how can this be reconciled?
this cannot be reconciled with the view he is a hoaxer. it is too huge a thing for it to be coincidence. this trumps anything he said about element 115 because anyone with any scientific knowledge should be familiar with the idea of islands of stability. but no one back then had any clue that this was even possible. no one. yet he stated matter of factly that the strong force and gravity are essentially the same thing.
The first superstring revolution is a period of important discoveries roughly between 1984 and 1986. It was realised that string theory was capable of describing all elementary particles as well as the interactions between them. Hundreds of physicists started to work on string theory as the most promising idea to unify physical theories. The revolution was started by a discovery of anomaly cancellation in type I string theory via the Green-Schwarz mechanism in 1984. Several other ground-breaking discoveries, such as the heterotic string, were made in 1985. It was also realised in 1985 that to obtain N=1 supersymmetry, the six small extra dimensions need to be compactified on a Calabi–Yau manifold.
Discover magazine in the November 1986 issue (vol 7, #11) featured a cover story written by Gary Taubes "Everything's Now Tied to Strings" which explained string theory for a popular audience.
it's quite another to say that the strong force is in fact a form of gravity or visa versa. no one did that.
originally posted by: aynock
a reply to: stormbringer1701
it's quite another to say that the strong force is in fact a form of gravity or visa versa. no one did that.
the article you linked to is not saying it either - it's talking about calculation methods
for me the key line in your quote from the article is '..remove the color factors..'
they say that a graviton by thier calculation method selects a feynman diagram that is similar enough to that of doubled gluon to merit the comparison.
Lazar said over two decades ago that the strong force and gravity were two manifestations of the same thing. that is uncanny.
those diagrams are not just amusing squiggles. they represent real world transactions.
originally posted by: aynock
a reply to: stormbringer1701
they say that a graviton by thier calculation method selects a feynman diagram that is similar enough to that of doubled gluon to merit the comparison.
yes but they are talking about the calculations being similar - the inverse square law is applicable to a number of physical phenomena - it doesn't mean that all these phenomena are 'manifestations of the same thing'
Lazar said over two decades ago that the strong force and gravity were two manifestations of the same thing. that is uncanny.
i would think the statement is so general as to be virtually meaningless from a scientific point of view
those diagrams are not just amusing squiggles. they represent real world transactions.
can you give me some real world evidence that gravitons exist?
and how do you explain that gluons have colour charge and gravitons don't if there is such a connection?
Fundamental particles with ground states having J=0 or J=2 are easily distinguished from glueballs. The hypothetical graviton, while having a total angular momentum J=2 would be massless and lack color charge, and so would be easily distinguished from glueballs.
you don't have to. it only takes a few researchers or one to figure it out. and usually the ones that actually do something special aren't those that think it cannot be done.
originally posted by: aynock
a reply to: stormbringer1701
that all sounds like fantasy football to me - or is it fantasy glueball?
Fundamental particles with ground states having J=0 or J=2 are easily distinguished from glueballs. The hypothetical graviton, while having a total angular momentum J=2 would be massless and lack color charge, and so would be easily distinguished from glueballs.
sorry, but i don't see any real world physics that supports bob's ideas