It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LowTechRedneck
a reply to: sirlancelot
You are fooling yourself if you think the loud-mouthed do-nothings called Tea Party plotiticians aren't bought and paid for by the same corporate interests pushing the TPP. Who do you think paid for their campaigns?
SCOTUS - However, the decision left intact the current $5,200 limit on how much an individual can give to any single candidate during a two-year election cycle. Until now, an individual donor could give up to $123,200 per cycle.
The ruling means a wealthy liberal or conservative donor can give as much money as desired to federal election candidates across the country, as long as no candidate receives more than the $5,200 cap.
originally posted by: tavi45
What follows is the most credible concrete sign ofthe emerging NWO. This is a conspiracy but not a made up one at all. Many good people in many nations are trying to sound the alarm. I'll start with the words of Congressman Alan Grayson.
"Last month, 10,000 of us submitted comments to the United States Trade Representative (USTR), in which we objected to new so-called free trade agreements. We asked that the government not sell out our democracy to corporate interests.
Because of this pressure, the USTR finally let a member of Congress – little ole me, Alan Grayson [anyone who's seen Grayson in action knows that he is formidable] – actually see the text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The TPP is a large, secret trade agreement that is being negotiated with many countries in East Asia and South America.
The TPP is nicknamed “NAFTA on steroids.” Now that I’ve read it, I can see why. I can’t tell you what’s in the agreement, because the U.S. Trade Representative calls it classified. But I can tell you two things about it.
1) There is no national security purpose in keeping this text secret.
2) This agreement hands the sovereignty of our country over to corporate interests.
3) What they can’t afford to tell the American public is that [the rest of this sentence is classified].
***
I will be fighting this agreement with everything I’ve got. And I know you’ll be there every step of the way.
***
Courage,
Congressman Alan Grayson
Grayson also noted:
It is ironic in a way that the government thinks it’s alright to have a record of every single call that an American makes, but not alright for an American citizen to know what sovereign powers the government is negotiating away.
***
Having seen what I’ve seen, I would characterize this as a gross abrogation of American sovereignty. And I would further characterize it as a punch in the face to the middle class of America. I think that’s fair to say from what I’ve seen so far. But I’m not allowed to tell you why!"
www.washingtonsblog.com... text-secret-this-agreement-hands-the-sovereignty-of-our-country-over-t.html
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: Daedalus
I didn't know you knew me well enough to know my position on Alex Jones :p
Apparently I've developed quite a reputation in a short time.
Is my reputation with you that I'm against conspiracy theories?
I dislike Alex Jones because I watched a troubled friend of mine descend into complete insanity thanks to Infowars. Alex Jones has a cluster bomb approach. What's the expression? Even a broken click is right twice a day.
I think the reason that I and the other people accepting it is because it's not coming from Alex Jones. It's being discussed by American politicians as well as people in power in many other nations. Canada and New Zealand have spoken strongly about it.
Notice I started the thread with a respected Congressman's actual words. When Alex Jones talks about it, it's a conspiracy theory. When someone credible talks about it it's a conspiracy
originally posted by: Daedalus
a reply to: MountainLaurel
based solely on this video clip, i'm gonna say: "i like her"....i know nothing about this senator, but i think i'd like to research her a bit...
originally posted by: tavi45
This is very very real. It's cloaked in secrecy. It will sell out America's sovereignty and the sovereignty of the other signatory nations to corporations, bankers, and others of the ruling elite. Remember all those laws preventing toxic waste in rivers or lead in children's toys. Meaningless. Remember the tiny smidgen of internet freedom we have? Gone.
Decide for yourself but this seems like every fear that people in the real world and especially people on this site have rolled into one.
They are so sure of our complacence they are doing it in plain sight. This is as conspiracy as it gets. It's also going to fly through in America now that corporatist Obama has the support of Congress.
This is not what any regular American wants. This is certainly not going to be beneficial to the other nations that sign on.
It's sole purpose is to defend the Western elites from the BRICs becoming strong enough to challenge their supremacy while simultaneously giving control of the signatory nations to supranational NWO control. That NWO thing everyone's talking about on here. It's getting pretty blatant and obvious now.