The guy who killed bin laden...right...

I have no respect for spec operators who advertise the fact. Don't give him any more press.

a reply to: judydawg

Thanks for that as I couldn't remember her name for the life of me.

As she was assassinated shortly after saying that, well, my logic says there's something to it and I would not doubt it was those remarks. I obviously have no proof but I believe what she said. She had more credibility than anyone on Capitol Hill other than Ron Paul so yeah, I believe what she said.

The whole story was shady as is. But the burial at sea? That was just weird. Then they claimed they had pictures but wouldn't release them. This is one conspiracy theory that I think might actually have some validity to it. I don't know what happened to Bin Laden, but I have a hard time buying the governments story.

a reply to: coastlinekid

It is very sad that we live in a society in where there is so much doubt in government... so very much doubt that a government... or powerful elements therein... are murdering its own citizens in order to push an agenda forward which interest is mainly financial gain and global control. Very sad, more so that this pinnacle of moral decay comes from our last hope and trust to make this world a better place.

Yeah. My thinking is not really sharp enough to speculate about what the truth is but I know when something doesn't smell right and this whole Osama thing has not smelt right from day one. Absolutely everything since 9/11 has had the same suspicious vibe.

Fox "news" is set to air Robert O’Neill's "official story," in a documentary - and by documentary I mean Fox's fictionalized version of government spin.

Members of O'Neill's unit are calling his story BS.


Bin Laden ‘Shooter’ Story Is FUBAR, Special Ops Sources Say
(dailybeast.com)

Remember, none of these guys would know who they were actually killing, they were just told to 'go here, kill everyone.' Once the intelligence assets got hold of the bodies and dumped them at sea, the evidence was gone forever.

a reply to: Blackmarketeer

How do you know the SEALs on that mission didn't know who their target was?

I was under the impression that mission planning was an all hands on deck ordeal, and that everybody involved in the mission had a briefing together so everybody knows their role.

I agree with you in that the dumping of the body at sea was questionable.

No matter what people think one way or the other.

All we have is the current administrations 'word' on it.

And that word doesn't have any value.

None WHAT SO EVER.

originally posted by: Asktheanimals
The logical follow-up is for our new SEAL "hero" to be kidnapped or assassinated by ISIS in a revenge killing.
Gotta stir up that hate with the public you know.

In a beheading video with a box cutter. Never mind the jar of animals blood on the ground.

i would not be surprised if OBL was being kept alive by the us to capitalize on the 2012 elections. then he died and they had to send in the seals to cover it up.

Isn't there a lot of conspiracies about the other members of seal team 6.
I have to say I didn't follow that angle that closely.

Overall, none of it passes the smell test, from what's already been mentioned in this thread
to the photo op in the war room, where everyone is shocked.

MY CONCLUSION

What they have done now is create the diversion, the subject discussed is no longer
"Did they really get him?" it is now "Who really got him?".

Very, very clever.

a reply to: coastlinekid

Well said my freind, anytime that a world fugitive gets toss of a boat in a coffin and sad dam gets publicly hanged and videotaped . There are questions ...

Maybe he should be charged for killing a CIA operative?

a reply to: coastlinekid

Don't forget about the Pakistani ex-Prime minister Benazir Bhutto...she gave an interview in 2007, where she categorically stated that Bin-Laden was killed years ago..and what was it, about a week later she herself was assassinated.

It's not particularly unusual for Pakistani politicians to be bumped off, or deposed in a coup etc, but the timing of her being murdered right after 'talking out of turn' about Bin-Laden being long gone, meaning the continued war in Afghanistan and the Seal raid on the Bin-Laden compound were both bogus, was more than a little suspicious.

That is why there is zero proof of Bin-Laden being at that compound, why the story and details of the raid has changed many times over the years, and why the Western worlds most wanted man's body was not taken back to forensic examination, but 'buried at sea'.

What a tangled web they weave.

a reply to: DeadSeraph

The killing of bin laden is probably the most ludicrous of all government cover ups

originally posted by: amurphy245
a reply to: DeadSeraph

The killing of bin laden is probably the most ludicrous of all government cover ups

Next to 9/11 ?

Learned some new stuff

originally posted by: amurphy245
a reply to: DeadSeraph

The killing of bin laden is probably the most ludicrous of all government cover ups

What's really odd is that you can mention how absurd it sounds to just about anybody and it just bounces right off of them. As though there's nothing fishy at all about the most wanted man on the face of the planet being killed and thrown in the water.

My own mother doesn't see anything suspicious about this story. I'm sorry to say that if they can fool so many people with such a bizarre story that should raise some very obvious red flags in anyone's mind, I don't think there's much hope that the same people will ask too many questions about anything else.

a reply to: Blackmarketeer
This is a classsic psychological warfare technique: argue over the details so that people do not argue over whether or not it happened.

If there are many "versions" of an event, the audience assumes it happened, because there are so many witnesses.

originally posted by: Ridhya
a reply to: Blackmarketeer
This is a classsic psychological warfare technique: argue over the details so that people do not argue over whether or not it happened.

If there are many "versions" of an event, the audience assumes it happened, because there are so many witnesses.

Yes. Simply change the subject.

I also found the timing of this latest "revelation" to be rather suspicious. I wonder if that means anything at all.