It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
originally posted by: Hanslune
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
a reply to: Hanslune
No. Like I have said plenty times by now, Lake Moeris has never been found. Get over it and read your opponents' posts before you jump into the ring. Just a hint.
However you are wrong, you don't get to make up geographical truths and impose them on others - lol
What is it they say about a haughty mind again? You'd might like to revisit the wisdom of the ages one of these days. I think you'd be amazed of what they will pull out of the Sahara in the years to come as more and more satellites are aimed at the dunes to uncover their secrets layer by layer. At the end of last Ice Age Sahara was green and stayed green until the Greeks and the Romans took over. Take a look at www.livescience.com... and www.livescience.com...
originally posted by: Hanslune
what evidence do you have that there was a large artificial lake located in the Libyan desert surrounded by AE ruins and connected to the Nile by canals.
Simple concept - so what do you have to back up your contention that so, so many people got so very much wrong?
originally posted by: Hanslune
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
Yep one would be astounded to find fossil rivers in a place that was once wet and savannah.
The question is where is the artificial lake with the AE construction around it (the odd city or two, islands with pyramids, etc) and the canals that connect it to the Nile.
The canals should be easy to find as they would have breached the walls of the Nile valley. Perhaps they were at Lake Moeris.......
originally posted by: Hanslune
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
Yep one would be astounded to find fossil rivers in a place that was once wet and savannah.
Hawass likely recognized the likelihood for theft. A good reason, in his mind, for not announcing the location of this huge site. Whether it's real or not, theives would certainly do damage, which was Hawass' main thrust - preservation.
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
originally posted by: Hanslune
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
Yep one would be astounded to find fossil rivers in a place that was once wet and savannah.
Not savanna, but millions of acres of farmland, wheat and barley for the most part.
originally posted by: atlantiswatusi
a reply to: Hanslune
Nothing you have seen in your scope of studies and travels didn't convince you that something like an Atlantis isn't out there?
I know you are one of three people whose sobering insight tends to suffocate the more out there imaginings on ancient cultures...but nothing someone like Hancock (set aside some of the more fantastical claims please) tries to point out about similarities in origin stories?
To me the greatest indicator is the fact that different cultures speak about teachers trying to help lead man out of dark times.
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Harte
Hawass likely recognized the likelihood for theft. A good reason, in his mind, for not announcing the location of this huge site. Whether it's real or not, theives would certainly do damage, which was Hawass' main thrust - preservation.
cods wollop. Its because as usual the real information is hidden behind an information wall. You simply like to defend the #fakehistory narrative.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
Imagine if we spent half of what we do on defense on archaeology and getting to Mars instead? For $500 billion we can dig up anything we want in Egypt and get to Mars on whats leftover.
Why would egyptian authorities continue to block research on the Labyrinth????