Republicans likely to lose again in the next election of 2016.

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: smithjustinb

I don't think when Republicans think of an ideal presidential candidate, Jeb Bush comes to mind.

I don't know about that. I don't personally see the big draw for him but I'm from FL and everyone that I run to would vote for him. Than again we have shady and mc shady Rick Scott and Charlie Christ

That's only because its Florida.

a reply to: interupt42

This is all you need to know about Ted Cruz. He nearly destroyed the entire worlds economy and made the dollar collapse just because he wanted to make a good performance for his base. He is the epitome of irresponsible behavior in Washington. Do you really want to hand over the authority to use actual WMD's to a guy who nearly unleashed a financial WMD "just because"?

a reply to: smithjustinb

That's only because its Florida.

many of the 19.55 million people that live in Florida , are snowbrids and former service people members that moved here.
many of those are not are not of retirement age, and i would dare say are a sample of the people in the rest of the country.

Demographics of Florida
.

a reply to: interupt42

You may be correct....but the damage ofagma has done is irreversible Republicans will be the majority in congress. Hillary has ZERO chance. At least I hope.

a reply to: Kalikiller
I thought that obama would not get elected for round two myself, I have no faith in the public not to elect garbage anymore lol.

a reply to: TKDRL

have no faith in the public not to elect garbage anymore lol.

If you give the public two choices: choice 1 [garbage] choice 2 [garbage] you get garbage.

What I have no faith on is the public recognizing that both sides are going to give you garbage.

a reply to: Kalikiller

You may be correct....but the damage ofagma has done is irreversible Republicans will be the majority in congress.

That is by design.

Do you find it crazy that the GOP and the republican media was in a uproar with Obamacare and how un American it is, and how its big gov't and it MUST be stopped or the world will end.

Then they go and not only elect a guy that actually implemented precursore to obamacare (Romneycare) but who also believed in it and claimed that it worked. because he helped created it but these Obamacare is just crazy.

This was by design and pushed for by the lobbying industry on both sides.

It was decided that the Democrat would take one for the team because Democrats would take it as positive thing to get it passed. By the time Democrats realise that Obamacare is not about the patients, enough time will have passed for it to not matter who did it.

As for the Republicans , their job was to act outraged and crazy about it. However in the end the lobbyist got what they wanted and the public still thinks THEIR party did the right thing.

When and if the Republicans get full control of congress don't hold your breath for them to undo Obamacare just like they haven't done any major de regulation for the Oil companies , Shrunk gov't , or decreased taxes.

Its all a game and the GOP and DNC provide puppets to give the illusion that peoples vote matter. This ensures that the people don't come together , and by making them feel empowered they won't figure it out and overthrow them from gov't .

originally posted by: smithjustinb
a reply to: interupt42

The Democrats love to bring up Jeb Bush when they talk about Republican contenders for 2016. I don't think when Republicans think of an ideal presidential candidate, Jeb Bush comes to mind. But, the democrats love to bring him up because they know that no one wants Jeb Bush to be president.

Exactly right. Jeb Bush is the new Mitt Romney. Republican voters don't want him, but the GOP establishment does, and will rig the primaries to get him on the ticket. I've said it before, look for a Jeb Bush/Susana Martinez GOP ticket in 2016. They will get their way come hell or high water, unless the PEOPLE DO SOMETHING this time around.

GOP voters need to get off their collective ass.

originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: Kalikiller
I thought that obama would not get elected for round two myself, I have no faith in the public not to elect garbage anymore lol.

The teachers' unions have succeeded in creating a nation of uneducated liberal voters.

originally posted by: Kalikiller
a reply to: interupt42

You may be correct....but the damage ofagma has done is irreversible Republicans will be the majority in congress. Hillary has ZERO chance. At least I hope.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

The republican have caused irreversible damage under Bush too!

Both party's have screwed your country up! Why cant you guys see that *facepalm*

originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: ScientiaFortisDefendit

I cant imagine anyone voting for Bush or any other interventionists in the GOP.

Bush the third or Clinton the second........and they say the USA dosnt have a aristocracy

a reply to: Nechash

I trust the tea part for fiscal responsibility and I trust the democrats for civil rights except for nanny state issues,

LOL civil rights eh!

Except for rich people,gun owners, and business owners.

The left is all about selective rights, and identity politics.

But then again WE ARE NOT SUPPOSE TO TRUST EITHER right or left.

Hell people are not supppose to 'trust' their government period.

Hell that GD piece of paper was specifically written because the founders had a severe distrust of absolute power.

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: ScientiaFortisDefendit

I cant imagine anyone voting for Bush or any other interventionists in the GOP.

Bush the third or Clinton the second........and they say the USA dosnt have a aristocracy

I am gonna have to agree there.

Americans say they don't like 'royalty' but they love the 'British' First family.

Then they made the Kennedy's royalty.

Then they made the Clintons royalty.

Then they made the Bush's royalty.

a reply to: neo96

The democrats use anti-rich rhetoric to win votes. If you look at their governing practice, they are not as anti-wealthy as they might come off. The only two things about their economic policy that bothers me is that they pour out complicated and redundant regulation that really doesn't improve upon every situation, and they think federal spending is almost always a goodness. If they had Keynesian economics coupled with good stewardship, we'd probably have a thriving economy right now. If they had regulation along with reasonable justice, we'd probably have protections in place without crippling business development. Regulation isn't a bad thing. Regulation only becomes bad when the bureaucracy runs away with the reigns of power, growing like a cancer, and the rules become so senseless and complicated that businesses would rather just avoid our country altogether than respect our laws.

a reply to: Nechash

Actors.lawyers,politicians.

All have one trait in common, and they all are exceptionally good at it.

They get paid big dollars to make people 'believe' something they are not.

Democrat,Republican.

That is the only truth anyone will ever find in American politics.

originally posted by: rockpaperhammock
a reply to: interupt42

i could see hillary winning just because people want to feel all warm and fuzzy about a female being president..."see...women can be presidents too!"

and of course women can be great leaders...i just mean that many will vote for her on that principle alone

After the OBama experiment I doubt Clinton would win considering both Obama and Clinton Have ties to Alinksy and America hasn't experienced the CHANGE Obama so aptly promoted.

Now if we get some Rhino Republican like Jeb Bush or more of the same then all bets are off!

a reply to: neo96

And we revere them as gods. A nation that worships those who lie, cheat and pretend for a living. No wonder things are getting bad. All the traditional virtues are reviled and all the old sins are now virtues.

What need is there to be fiscal conservative as long as America has the petrodollar and demand for oil keeps growing?

a reply to: crazyewok

Bush the third or Clinton the second........and they say the USA dosnt have a aristocracy

Exactly right, Even Barbara Bush agrees.

politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...

Barbara Bush made national headlines last year when she said on NBC that her son Jeb shouldn't run for president in 2016 because "there are a lot of great families. It's not just four families, or whatever. There are other people out there that are very qualified. We've had enough Bushes."

"I think this is a great American country, and if we can't find more than two or three families to run for high office, that's silly."

a reply to: sirlancelot

and America hasn't experienced the CHANGE Obama so aptly promoted.

American politics has been made into a team sport, no more common sense or critical thought required.

People vote solely on who the GOP or the DNC picks as their candidate, no matter what.