It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bicent76
a reply to: Gully
that is just stupid...
The more I learn about how this was handled the more I wonder who was in charge of this.. 70 skilled medical workers cared for someone with ebola, and I am betting not in the proper protective suits either..
STUPID...
What is wrong with these people...
50 to 60 percent mortality rate scares me...
www.forbes.com...
originally posted by: Bicent76
a reply to: nukedog
per forbes, death toll in west AFRIKA, is at 4000 or so RECORDED CASES.... Since April 2014.
In the past, some Ebola outbreaks became visible only after transmission was amplified in a health care setting and doctors and nurses fell ill. However, once the Ebola virus was identified and proper protective measures were put in place, cases among medical staff dropped dramatically.
originally posted by: ValentineWiggin
a reply to: texasgirl
Holy cow.
I don't even think there are 70 nurses in our whole Hospital here.
The medical records given to the AP offer clues, both to what happened and who was involved, but the hospital says the CDC does not have them.
A CDC spokesman did not dispute that the agency did not have the medical records, and said he would double check. It's unclear why those reports are not in the hands of federal health investigators.
The CDC has not yet established a firm number of health care workers who had contact with Duncan.