It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: flammadraco
originally posted by: nonspecific
I imagine that is the rationale for them having armed forces.
However with no Armed forces they would be unable to involve themselves with world conflicts. Acts of terrorism are commited when groups of people either react to a threat or attack or use violence as a way to create change when all other methods prove inefctual.
I do not see how a terrorist group would have a motive to commit an act of violence against a small island that has no bearing on the cause they or fighting for? a reply to: DJW001
2007 Glasgow International Airport attack
Source
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
I think free prescriptions are hugely important. Firstly because they are an investment in good health. Its better for someone to be treated early rather than wait till the condition requires a hospital visit.
Secondly morally I happen to believe health care should be free.
Thirdly in England the system of excemptions is so complicated it reduces any financial benefit if charging to close to zero.
Agree that respect amongst posters is sometimes sadly lacking and appreciate your comment..
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
I believe any property owned is nhs Scotland anything not would be covered by the normal distribution of assets and debt.
Of coyrse due to the joys of pfi a chunk is probably private owned
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
originally posted by: flammadraco
originally posted by: nonspecific
I imagine that is the rationale for them having armed forces.
However with no Armed forces they would be unable to involve themselves with world conflicts. Acts of terrorism are commited when groups of people either react to a threat or attack or use violence as a way to create change when all other methods prove inefctual.
I do not see how a terrorist group would have a motive to commit an act of violence against a small island that has no bearing on the cause they or fighting for? a reply to: DJW001
2007 Glasgow International Airport attack
Source
Committed not by a country but by the usual fanatical individuals that no country can defend itself against. However the event you mention was defended by someone who quite literally decked the terrorists with his fists whilst the terrorists were burning !!!!! Who needs an army when you have active citizens !!!
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
I think free prescriptions are hugely important. Firstly because they are an investment in good health. Its better for someone to be treated early rather than wait till the condition requires a hospital visit.
Secondly morally I happen to believe health care should be free.
Thirdly in England the system of excemptions is so complicated it reduces any financial benefit if charging to close to zero.
Agree that respect amongst posters is sometimes sadly lacking and appreciate your comment..
Thanks ScepticScot. I agree with the free prescription piece, as a partner of someone who will be on asthma medication the rest of their life, I can totally understand. I can't however see that Scotland can blame Westminster if providing it (through their choice) has not done their budget any favours. I guess I can only see it as making the choices that are morally right, but may expose other areas as equally needy to risk when frankly, there is only so much money to spend.
Sometimes people have to hold their hands up and say they made their choice rather than just blame others. I could of course say similar about education, but I hope I made a point that governments have a responsibility about how and where they spend what funds they have, rather than blame others, but that is I'm sure true all over the world.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: angryhulk
Maybe you could tell grain that about a yes vote.
originally posted by: grainofsand
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: angryhulk
Maybe you could tell grain that about a yes vote.
What, do you disagree that the continuing UK will negotiate very harshly, even savagely, against a foreign Scotland when deciding the terms of a divorce? All politicians smiles will be replaced with knives after any yes vote.
The current UK breaks UN resolutions and EU or other laws quite often when dealing with foreign nations.
The UK has been party to enough military conflict in many oil rich nations so why on earth would you think the UK government will not try to screw a foreign Scotland for every penny it can get? Scotland will be a soft political target for a continuing UK, a UK which will be run by a Conservative/Tory majority in Westminster, with representation in all the important world governmental organisations that Scotland doesn't even have observer status in.
I didn't think you were that naive.
He said: ‘Two young men aged in their 20s came up to me. I was talking to one of them normally, but then absolutely out of the blue the other just swung a punch at my head. I was a bit shocked and fell slightly backwards. I carry a white stick because I am half blind – they would have seen that.’
Police in Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, said a man in his 70s had a No poster taken from his mobility scooter and replaced with Yes stickers as he was shopping.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
I think free prescriptions are hugely important. Firstly because they are an investment in good health. Its better for someone to be treated early rather than wait till the condition requires a hospital visit.
Secondly morally I happen to believe health care should be free.
Thirdly in England the system of excemptions is so complicated it reduces any financial benefit if charging to close to zero.
Agree that respect amongst posters is sometimes sadly lacking and appreciate your comment..
Thanks ScepticScot. I agree with the free prescription piece, as a partner of someone who will be on asthma medication the rest of their life, I can totally understand. I can't however see that Scotland can blame Westminster if providing it (through their choice) has not done their budget any favours. I guess I can only see it as making the choices that are morally right, but may expose other areas as equally needy to risk when frankly, there is only so much money to spend.
Sometimes people have to hold their hands up and say they made their choice rather than just blame others. I could of course say similar about education, but I hope I made a point that governments have a responsibility about how and where they spend what funds they have, rather than blame others, but that is I'm sure true all over the world.
You said it...Have you any idea of the Billions that are wasted year in year out in the UK.
We have Foodbanks and High levels of poverty....you know...The English, Welsh Northern Irish should be asking the same question as we are...where does all the Oil and Gas money go... this should be a bonus money to help stop poverty...looks to me like they use it for anything and everything other than help reduce poverty.
originally posted by: flammadraco
a reply to: Soloprotocol
To back up what I was saying last night, just saw this in the news today;
He said: ‘Two young men aged in their 20s came up to me. I was talking to one of them normally, but then absolutely out of the blue the other just swung a punch at my head. I was a bit shocked and fell slightly backwards. I carry a white stick because I am half blind – they would have seen that.’
Police in Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, said a man in his 70s had a No poster taken from his mobility scooter and replaced with Yes stickers as he was shopping.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Soloprotocol
Good luck fella, and for everyone who is voting tomorrow.
A no vote which changes the UK for the better of all of us is my hope, but if you do leave then at that point I will support my nation in any negotiations with yours.
That is the nature of competing foreign nations as far as I see it, and I choose to fight for an improved Union, but if you do leave then I will support my country over yours every time.
*Edit*
...it's a tribal thing I'm sure you can understand