‘Mysterious’ Blue Lights Invade Woman’s Home

This article and video discuss blue balls of light that are caught on camera by a woman in her home. She asks a professional, John Bomhoff, who has been a videographer and editor for over 30 years, if he can analyze what she caught; he says he has never seen anything like this.

At first view, he thought the lights were just some sort of bioluminescent insect, but he quickly changed his mind when Sally mentioned that they were invisible to the naked eye.

“I began to analyze the footage. A few things were obvious from the start,” he explains. “They are not reflections of anything, they move in directions totally unrelated to the camera movement, and they move just as much when the camera is still. They move much faster than the camera is moving, and although many seem to be straight lines, they are not all in straight lines.”
The lights also taken random turns and don’t seem to be afraid of the camera.

Bomhoff calls these blue pickets. I call them blue orbs.

Listen to Bomhoff's analysis in the video:


cryptozoologynews.com...

Wow thats different lol rods springs to mind haha very cool post SnF...

a reply to: sled735

What utter rubbish.

I'm sorry but this is ridiculous, she's filming bugs, how can anyone not see this?

a reply to: AlphaHawk

But. But.
She said there weren't any bugs.

a reply to: Phage

Yeah...about that...

I guess it's because they're invisible to the naked eye she says that!

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: sled735

What utter rubbish.

I'm sorry but this is ridiculous, she's filming bugs, how can anyone not see this?

Do you really think a man with over 30 years experience in film analysis wouldn't know what a freakin' bug looks like?
Did you watch ALL the video analysis?

a reply to: sled735

I got some of the way through..I stopped when he says they don't appear to fly away from the camera and then a few seconds later one clearly flys away from the camera....

His "30 years experience" is just fluff to fool the weak minded, making them think what he says carries authority.

a reply to: sled735
He said they looked like bugs.
But. But. She said they were invisible so they can't be bugs.

a reply to: sled735

it's the end of a flash light ...

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: sled735

I got some of the way through..I stopped when he says they don't appear to fly away from the camera and then a few seconds later one clearly flys away from the camera....

His "30 years experience" is just fluff to fool the weak minded, making them think what he says carries authority.

Or maybe it's the "weak-minded" that can't handle the "truth".

I'd say the gray flying things are fleas, and the white spots are lacewing flies or falling dust from the ceiling.

a reply to: stormcell

I've never in my over 50 years seen a flea that goes zipping through the air like that. And both of those would be visible to the naked eye.

Clearly, you didn't watch the video, did you? Maybe you should go back and watch his analysis before you post your opinion on what it is.

He says at the end that he believes they are very small bugs, he just can't explain why they only show up on her phone. Not really that controversial.

originally posted by: jaws1975
He says at the end that he believes they are very small bugs, he just can't explain why they only show up on her phone. Not really that controversial.

He also said he wasn't sure what they were, and asked anyone with any ideas to post on his site. This man obviously isn't familiar with orbs. He doesn't even call them by the correct name. He called them Pickets.
The name isn't what's important though. It's the analysis that is.

a reply to: sled735

Or maybe it's the "weak-minded" that can't handle the "truth".

You could be right.

Is that why you won't accept that they're bugs?

a reply to: sled735

I agree, I meant that he's not getting crazy with his speculation. The video is interesting, would have been even cooler if his camera had picked them up too.

a reply to: sled735

Lol. The first half of the video is like, "sure this seems believable," then he guy "increases saturation" and is ignorant of the effect that increasing an image's saturation has on elements in the image. He's been a videographer and video editor for 30+ years? Please.

There are slow motion cameras that can records hundreds, if not thousands, of frames per second. If these people are really confused, they should try using one of these cameras. If the effects only show up on video recorded by the woman's iPhone, then there is something wrong with her iPhone. Maybe some Chinese sweatshop blood magic.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: sled735
He said they looked like bugs.
But. But. She said they were invisible so they can't be bugs.

Yup. Yup. ... He waits until about the 9:10 mark of the video to say just that. Blue pickets my ass. LOL

Did you also note they were trying to film under high intensity lighting? LOL Not like ol' Sally wasn't trying to draw flies.

I'm gonna stop wasting my time on this kind of nonsense. My 'weak mind' can't handle the truth. (Best Jack Nicholson impression ... of course)

a reply to: sled735

Good thread. S&F

Here is a blowup that DarkBlade71 took of an orb when he went to The Palmer House Plantation.
You can see the eyes (looking to our right), and the open smiling mouth. It has similar colors that are shown in the orb that Bomhoff is analyzing. If this orb was shown during flight it would probably look the same.

a reply to: Mindless1980

Dust doesn't have eyes