It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
a reply to: guitarplayer
Also.. I wouldn't be as dramatic as to say they are shelling their cities, but whatever floats your boat.
Well. That's what your friends at Hamas do to Israel. So why not?
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
a reply to: smithjustinb
Not really. Thousands of years, a completely different ethnicity Jew, land that may or may not be correct? Sorry, the Indians are still here not pointing at their land not pointing at a book that makes the claim for their land.
You and I both know what you are saying is absurd but you are holding on tight.
originally posted by: thov420
a reply to: howmuch4another
So it's bow to the Israeli demands or be bombed out of existence? Great options there.
He said three other lines of evidence converged to support his conclusion. A three-foot layer of ash, containing many pottery fragments and mud bricks from a wall
originally posted by: ANNED
The Israeli's did not take the land.
The big secret is they were given the land to get rid of them by the UK, US and France.
In 1939, Great Britain reneged on the Balfour Declaration by issuing the White Paper, which stated that creating a Jewish state was no longer a British policy. It was also Great Britain's change in policy toward Palestine, especially the White Paper, that prevented millions of European Jews to escape from Nazi-occupied Europe to Palestine.
originally posted by: thov420
Imagine that, offered a piece of land that isn't your homeland and saying no? How about Israel give the Palestinians their own homeland, I bet they would say yes. Being from MN, If I was forced out and given a piece of WI or IA and told to accept it or die I know what my choice would be. F off, period. How about we let them have their own land instead of trying to appease them with others land?
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: buster2010
Yea that's true... and they also have repeatedly overlooked it happening...
If your on the "right" side of things the international community doesn't mind you taking land by force...especially if it was taken after you were attacked.
originally posted by: Xeven
First I, ll say I have no dog in this fight. Personally I think they should all join together under one Democratic government with equal representation with separation of religion and state.
If anyone's goal is for Israel to give up its government or land then your on a fools errand.
The Palestinians and anyone supporting them simply will never have the power in any form to defeat Israel, let alone all the power backing Israel both politically and militarily.
Even if you believe in Allah and pray every day, it ain't happening.
If Allah is real he has consistently shown that it is his will for Israel to win. If you believe Allah controls things here on Earth it is OBVIOUS that it is his will for Israel to exist because it does.. It is Obvious that those opposing Israel are also opposing Allah's will.
Why is it obvious? Well again if you believe Allah's will is what makes stuff happen here on earth then Allah has willed Israel to exist and for those who oppose Israel to lose horribly. Allah has willed Israel to be powerful and to have the most powerful allies Allah has ever willed to exist on this planet.
To not accept this means your admitting Israel and it's allies can deny Allah's will or you are in denial of your own beliefs and reality.
Ultimately if they keep fighting an obviously overwhelming foe many thousands more of them will die compared to minimal losses to Israel and Israel allies.
If they want a Palestinian State they should accept Egypt generous offer and go live in peace. Once they establish a peaceful society, perhaps then they can go live in harmony with Israel in those coveted lands.
originally posted by: DarknStormy
a reply to: smithjustinb
The difference is they cannot justify taking that land back through their ancestors, it must be justified through the teachings of Judaism also and it isn't.
originally posted by: DarknStormy
originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: samsamm9
A small percentage of the so called 'palestinians' are descendants of the peoples who have lived in Palestine over the centuries.... the rest are just like Mr Spad explained, they are basically descendants of refugees.
Its funny how the only argument anti-zionists end up leaning on is the claim that Jews aren't Jews... lol... and they claim they are not anti-semitic. Laughable.
Know what is laughable? You pull the Anti-Semite trick out yet Palestinians are likely more Semite than most Jews in Israel.
originally posted by: BasementWarriorKryptonite
a reply to: combatmaster
Semantics seem quite important in this case.
originally posted by: combatmaster
originally posted by: DarknStormy
originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: samsamm9
A small percentage of the so called 'palestinians' are descendants of the peoples who have lived in Palestine over the centuries.... the rest are just like Mr Spad explained, they are basically descendants of refugees.
Its funny how the only argument anti-zionists end up leaning on is the claim that Jews aren't Jews... lol... and they claim they are not anti-semitic. Laughable.
Know what is laughable? You pull the Anti-Semite trick out yet Palestinians are likely more Semite than most Jews in Israel.
Dont play semantics.....beacause according to you they are not really Jews... classic anti-semitism.