It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thov420
How about the US government just keep their noses out of everybody else's business?
Oh wait, the US government doesn't speak for all US citizens.
I'm not a fan of any government
but I would still fight for my land against foreign invaders.
If those Indians want to come fight for their land back I wouldn't like it
originally posted by: thov420
Imagine that, offered a piece of land that isn't your homeland and saying no? How about Israel give the Palestinians their own homeland, I bet they would say yes. Being from MN, If I was forced out and given a piece of WI or IA and told to accept it or die I know what my choice would be. F off, period. How about we let them have their own land instead of trying to appease them with others land?
originally posted by: Patriotsrevenge
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
a reply to: smithjustinb
You think the people born during the turmoil aren't alive? From 47 to 67? I assure you many of them are, and the ones that arent, well it was there kids and grandkids homes that were stolen.
You would be okay with someone taking your home away from your family? Your kids and grandkids?
Israel NEVER took anyone's home away unless they were TERRORIST!
There are tons of Arabs living inside Israel as we speak, even the family of Hamas's leader. If you ever stopped smoking weed and went to visit Israel you would see how bad the Jews want this fight to stop. Just because the Arabs took the land from the Jews and then made them slaves gives the Arabs no dam right to lay claim to Israel. Not one dam bit. The UN seemed to think the same thing in 1948 and even gave the Arabs the whole country of Jordan at the same time.
originally posted by: Patriotsrevenge
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
a reply to: smithjustinb
You wouldn't? If someone took my home and the home of everyone I knew.. I think I would hold a grudge my entire life. Some of the people might not, but of course many will and are justified in it.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: JiggyPotamus The jews were all moving together and this deal seemed to just give the palestinians more land if they unarmed themselves. It is not the same.
However as the other member came in and pointed out the part of the deal that includes no weapons that does pose a valid reason to reject the offer but i would still take it because land aint cheap and there is no doubt that strength can come through growth.
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
a reply to: guitarplayer
Would they have been justified.. yes.
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
a reply to: guitarplayer
Also.. I wouldn't be as dramatic as to say they are shelling their cities, but whatever floats your boat.
originally posted by: thov420
You know if this was still the 1800's you might have a point, but it's not. If those Indians want to come fight for their land back I wouldn't like it but I sure wouldn't hold it against them.
originally posted by: smithjustinb
Then, why hold it against the Israelis, who, by the way, were the only people to ever occupy that land without conquering it?
originally posted by: Ridhya
originally posted by: smithjustinb
Then, why hold it against the Israelis, who, by the way, were the only people to ever occupy that land without conquering it?
DID YOU NOT READ THE BIBLE?!!! The Hebrews exterminated the Canaanites!!
originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: samsamm9
A small percentage of the so called 'palestinians' are descendants of the peoples who have lived in Palestine over the centuries.... the rest are just like Mr Spad explained, they are basically descendants of refugees.
Its funny how the only argument anti-zionists end up leaning on is the claim that Jews aren't Jews... lol... and they claim they are not anti-semitic. Laughable.
Shows you how much they want peace and that they only want the destruction of the Jews.