It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On Friday, President Obama added his signature to legislation that will cut $8.7 billion in food stamp benefits over the next 10 years, causing 850,000 households to lose an average of $90 per month. The signing of the legislation known as the 2014 Farm Bill occurred at a public event in East Lansing, Mich.
The food stamp cuts are one component of a massive omnibus bill which also includes billions of dollars in crop insurance and various other programs and subsidies involving American agriculture. Before he signed the legislation, President Obama praised it as an example of bipartisan problem-solving that would help create jobs and move the American economy forward...
When House Republicans originally argued for a food stamp cut of between $20.5 billion and $39 billion, the White House threatened to veto both of those proposals. During his Friday speech, the president did not say whether he was satisfied with the final $8.7 billion figure, or even mention the cuts at all. Instead, he praised the food stamp program and said that the final Farm Bill preserved much-needed benefits.
originally posted by: Shiloh7
a reply to: ArchPlayer
Surely if you gave a damn about the people out of work and families out of work, you would create the jobs first and then cut the food stamps?
At least with a white POTUS, half of this mess would have been scrutinized with such a fine tooth comb it never WOULD HAVE HAPPENED.
IMO this signing proves that both the Democrats and Republicans are working for the same commonality. If this doesn't convince people to deny ignorance, I don't know what will
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: Shiloh7
a reply to: ArchPlayer
Surely if you gave a damn about the people out of work and families out of work, you would create the jobs first and then cut the food stamps?
If they created jobs for everyone there would be no need for food stamps, but they wont do that. they need a sector of society to deflect the sheeples attention as to how we got in this mess in the first place.
It wasn't the bankers, it' wasn't the politicians, who, if they were in the private sector, would have been sacked long ago..
Na, it was then nasty Unemployed, workshy, Ne'er-do-wells who caused all this mess. Blame them, cut their income..hey, the masses wont mind even if we stick them in Work Camps.
originally posted by: the owlbear
So, food stamps get cut...
Welfare for farmers gets increased. Oops, "subsidies".
...and this is supposed to create jobs how? Will farmers hire more migrant workers or just pocket the money?
originally posted by: Shiloh7
a reply to: ArchPlayer
Surely if you gave a damn about the people out of work and families out of work, you would create the jobs first and then cut the food stamps?