Red Alert!!! Sgt Major Dan Page the truth of America's future WAKE UP!!!!!!!! Ferguson

a reply to: zysin5

I'm Irish/Native American and I had a Marine for a step father through my teen years. They are a molded and shaped person, its the effect of years of government training and indoctrination. A true blue American with a flag in one hand and a bible in another. The type to write to there congressmen to complain there isn't enough Christianity in government. To throw Forth of July BBQ's with members of there church sometimes at the church, with red white and blue everywhere, but never any Blacks or Latinos.

If I had a dollar for every one of these meeting I have set through growing up, a former member of the military would speak and basically they would say the same type of rhetoric. The world wants us dead, the government wants us dead, the elite wants us dead and the devil or anti Christ is coming....oh and the main part is we are under attack....always under attack. Even today, they are constantly under attack, hmmm I see no bodies or wounded.

There are communities that do have bodies and wounded. Killed because of color, or sexual preference and generally killed by someone like officer page, he admits that he has killed and will kill again.

I 100% support Officer Page's right to speak, but I don't support his racist, sexist, bigoted remarks.

However of all people in society, when a higher ranking military or higher ranking police officer decides to speak in a comfortable setting we should all pay attention.

a reply to: LDragonFire

Thanks for the reply Dragonfire! I too come from a military family. And I can read between the lines as you just explained. Is why I got the message loud and clear, and had the empathy for Dan there as he reminds me of some of my fathers friends. Warriors that have seen some real stuff in their lives. Makes them hard, and a bit out spoken. I am sure if any of us went through some of the stuff he has seen, we might be slightly jaded as well.

Plus he comes from a different time and age than this newer generation. Those who can read between the lines can get a good and mindful alert from Dan. I have to admit, when he first started his speech I was right there with him. Even the bible part, I can understand that point to. Always, even as much as I would disagree with his world view, I would still stand up for his right to say it. As I have said to others on here who share my polar opposite world view.
Once we start to police each others thoughts and what we say, we then have become the very thing we fight against.

I will fight for a person's right to speak their mind. And on the other side of the coin, I will fight for my right for what I think is right, and sometimes they clash and meet a deadlock. But Dan and I can agree on one thing. Our freedoms are being taken from within. And those minute men who once defended this country have long been dead.

Dan is a dying breed of a mans man. We can learn much, if we just read between the lines. And this learning curve is on multiple levels. From what to expect from a government who has become corrupted, WE the people have the power. They serve us. We must FIGHT if we want to keep our freedom, things changed for the USA in 1912. And bigoted remarks do not earn brownie points with those who might be willing to stand next to you in this, so many lessons, they fall upon a personal point of view lessons that we all learn on our own. Such things can only be seen from point of view. Some will take what they need, and leave the rest. Others will toss the baby out with the bath water. I almost did. The only reason I gave it any thought is because I find you to be a trusted source on here DF.

I gotcha, we are spot on.

I'm still waiting for his book to come out. He sounds like a salesman that had a bad day. He mixes religion with how they want the world to be. He says he has a target on his back, but they continue to let him do talk and seminars. Well sure they do, he pushin what they want him to say and do to agitate people to do something. This guy has issues from what he saw and what he done in the military. I don't buy it. Most drill seargeants are good at what they do. That is to drill and drill and drill over and over the same ole retoric of brain washin so the people will act like they want you to act and cause trouble that way they have a reason to throw you in jail and lock you up. He is AN AGITATOR. Do not attempt to change the channel we control the horizontal and verticle,your next stop is in the twilight zone. Heading: THE AGITATOR. do,do,do,do,do,do.

a reply to: LDragonFire

Another Dan Page Interview . . .




Does not seem to be working here is the link.



In this video Dan Page recounts his own biography as it pertains to his military service--which I am close to calling total BS at this point. This guy is a great candidate for a Stolen Valor investigation.

a reply to: AphoticJoe



This video?

a reply to: AphoticJoe

That's it.

He had a senior position in JSOC and that says all I need to know,REX 84 ,real COG ops, I knew a Ranger. His religious choice of wording is a back blast at the popular culture and non traditional efforts of the left are also accurate. I would NOT use his wording but yes I am similar53,Cav, if a bit less caring about popular cultural variances(THEY SUCK) to me it makes no difference WHY you are gay the male act makes my skin crawl and I want it out of my face.RAP is complete GARBAGE because the recording bastards took my metal and downed it anyway because they thought we were SATANIC AND VIOLENT and we never WERE Satanic.
I like GUNS you would not get far from ME if I was intent on your demise, but you are mostly STILL missing one key factor.he and I DON'T like it we are JUST GOOD(Count your blessings our "KIND" are Americans or America WOULD be gone) at it and we want YOU to understand because bad guys are everywhere,not because our political leanings require it and CERTAINLY not wanting to have MORE just fighting what we can or have to.
THAT having been said WHAT he is describing sounds alot like OMEGA Agency stuff.

Cyclone Katrina demonstrated how multiple branches of the military and security/federal,state and local agencies co-ordinated,the Coast Guard was the only effective force for quite some time,the rest was a case of too many chiefs and not enough indians I honestly do not believe there is the co-ordination between all levels necessary to pull of a coup-unless the Coast Guard organises it.(attempt at humour)

originally posted by: Murgatroid
a reply to: LDragonFire

the question is will it make a difference?

A picture paints a thousand words...

www.dallasnews.com...Huey P. Newton Gun Club leads open-carry rally in South Dallas
Forgive me for putting this in racialized terms but there is no way around this, but white folks for the last six years have been showing up en-masse with guns and don't thread on me flags some were kool I guess but alot had this racist tinged to them,as a person who felt annoyed that folks would wanna take guns to a protest or a fast food joint being from back east I just don't get it maybe it's a cultural thing, and it's not that I am afraid of guns as an ex military man I had to re-qualify with small arms ever so often some times on the 50 cal, but I just feel like an arms race begat even more guns and no one really wins except gun manufactures and shops, while they are fun to fire sooner or later you may feel the urge to fire on something other than a Styrofoam target , I secretly wished that this would remain a mostly White folks thing , for the cops generally don't go out of their way to shoot them,see Bundy Ranch folks but black folks running around with open carry this will not end well, and I am saying as a student of history the 70ts killed an awful lot of African American youth leaders who thought the 2nd amendment include them.

a reply to: Spider879

They're just bitching about gun control they don't want to harm anyone. It will die down when bozo is gone

a reply to: Spider879

The Dred Scott decision arguably the worst supreme court decision in history ruled on in 1857 ultimately lead to the civil war 3 years later, the civil war would have been avoided if the court would have made the correct decision. But the court would not give this:

It would give to persons of the negro race, ...the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, ...to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased ...the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went.

wiki

a reply to: LDragonFire The abuse of excessive force is obvious, the officer could have stayed in the car and called for back-up. The officer and police department has never issued any remorse for the execution of this young man. As far as I'm concerned, the Furguson police department has shown a lack of any feelings about the death of the young man. They seem to be klu klux klan members, it looks like a cover-up to me but the facts have not been released. I am very confused on why some of the members of the community are destroying their own town? I am not saying the young man is innocent but should have not been killed and left on the street in that manner. The Furguson police department needs to be overhauled and the chief replaced.

We should stop labeling people by color, the award of the Police officer award seemed to be more important the police chief than saying it was a tragedy what happened. The Furguson police department actions are disturbing and shows how some people are just so disconnected.

I have no feelings for the police officer, he decided to be the judge and executioner.

originally posted by: LDragonFire
a reply to: Spider879

The Dred Scott decision arguably the worst supreme court decision in history ruled on in 1857 ultimately lead to the civil war 3 years later, the civil war would have been avoided if the court would have made the correct decision. But the court would not give this:

It would give to persons of the negro race, ...the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, ...to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased ...the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went.

wiki

Aye so many missed opportunities to make a more perfect union,reconstruction was another "sigh"

a reply to: maxzen2004

I don't think Wilson will be charged or convicted. Current law and training procedures are a direct result of idiotic supreme court decisions. Much of this is George W Bush's legacy, he is the president that super charged the militarization of the civilian police for the war on terror, but its his supreme court appointees that have turned us into a police state:

This link explains why we are were we are at:

These are the hallmarks of the emerging American police state: where police officers, no longer mere servants of the people entrusted with keeping the peace, are part of an elite ruling class dependent on keeping the masses corralled, under control, and treated like suspects and enemies rather than citizens.

A review of the Supreme Court’s rulings over the past 10 years, including some critical ones this term, reveals a startling and steady trend towards pro-police state rulings by an institution concerned more with establishing order and protecting government agents than with upholding the rights enshrined in the Constitution.

T he U.S. Supreme Court Is Marching in Lockstep with the Police State

You all can blame Obama all you want but the current supreme court and there unconstitutional ruling are why we are here.

a reply to: maxzen2004

I have no feelings for the police officer, he decided to be the judge and executioner.

Very easy for a self-righteous fool to utter proclamations of fault and judgements, and yet was not there and admits to not knowing the facts. The same approach is what is resulting in fools burning their own neighborhood.

We do not, in fact, know that Brown was "executed" any more than we know whether the officer was acting in self-defense.

a reply to: bbracken677
I disagree, what would have happened if he waited and not have shot him? Brown was not a dangerous criminal, I wouldn't want a cop that makes terrible life changing decisions. That cop screwed has himself and his family, he should look for white supremacist community, he'll fit right in and be protected. He'll look fine in a SS uniform!

a reply to: LDragonFire

Your link: The website provides a very spun description of each of the SCOTUS decisions. I would ask that people, rather than simply accepting the descriptions as provided, go to SCOTUSBLOG and see the actual decisions.

For instance:

Police can forcibly take your DNA, whether or not you’ve been convicted of a crime. In Maryland v. King (2013), a divided Court determined that a person arrested for a crime who is supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty must submit to forcible extraction of their DNA. Once again the Court sided with the guardians of the police state over the defenders of individual liberty in determining that DNA samples may be extracted from people arrested for “serious offenses.” While the Court claims to have made its decision based upon concerns of properly identifying criminal suspects upon arrest, what they actually did is open the door for a nationwide dragnet of suspects targeted via DNA sampling.

This passage makes it seem much different than the actual decision, which was simply that DNA was a form of identification along the likes of photograph and fingerprints. So unless photographing and fingerprinting us when we are arrested and taken to the station for processing is a violation of our rights, than neither is the taking of DNA samples.

Holding: When officers make an arrest supported by probable cause to hold a suspect for a serious offense and bring him to the station to be detained in custody, taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee’s DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on June 3, 2013. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined.

So, in the first you have a highly biased and volatile way to describe the decision. In the 2nd you have the actual decision. Following the logic of the first description, one would have to be found guilty of a crime before they could be arrested.

Make your your own mind who is trying to provide a biased and inflammable description.

Personally, I find it insulting when someone commits this kind of intellectual dishonesty.

a reply to: bbracken677
4th Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. - See more at: constitution.findlaw.com...

a reply to: bbracken677

a reply to: LDragonFire

DragonFire, do you have a list of prosecutor names for those cases? Ie, those that were pressing for such flagrant violations? I believe the SCOTUS is not acting of their own free will, so I cannot blame them directly.

I would like to, shall we say, research "them."