a reply to:
Agit8dChop
Pardon me, if I may interject some thoughts and comments. Firstly, I do believe the video is heavily edited, and the end result was the decapitation
of Mr. Foley. A poster, about mid-thread, suggested a link to a website. Please, if you have not, visit that website.
There are some stills from the video, one in particular, is when the barbarian begins to cut. It is a close-up, and indeed, it shows blood.
Medically, I can tell you, that until you hit arteries, razor sharp wounds do not bleed immediately, in fact, are slow to bleed. There is a rush of
blood, not much, from tissue, then arteries and large vessels are what produces voluminous blood. The video was cut away well before it reached that
stage. Watching any surgery video in which a scalpel is used will prove that point.
The knife that was used is pictured on the ground, next to the corpse, in another still, in which the head was placed upon the victims' back. The
knife had been cleaned, and appears to be a katana style knife. I actually own about 7 or 8 of these, myself. Trust me, a nice, sharp katana would
suffice nicely for the horrible deed it was used for.
Considering said knife had been cleaned, then staged next to the corpse, which had also been staged with the head upon the back, lends to reasonable
summation that once the deed was done, the corpse itself was also staged.
You should also lend some credence to the fact that, drugged or not, this man likely immediately went into shock. Anyone in that situation would. The
shock and horror that fills you at that moment must be unspeakable. You will notice, also, that he appears to raise his knee in an attempt to begin to
fight. Between likely being shackled, handcuffed, drugged, and then disabled by the grip on his chin and head positioning, there was little to nothing
he could do. Immediately as the video cut away, you can detect a small gutteral sound begin from inside him, as horrific as it is.
Also, in the video, but more noticeable in the still, you will see one of his shoes by his right foot, and, a mark on his ankle. The mark on his ankle
appears to be from some type of longterm use of a restraint. It is present only on the right ankle, not the left. The browning of his skin on his
ankle proves he had been shackled long term, as any type of anklet or jewelry would not leave a mark such as that. It was tight.
The extremeties would pale when drained of blood, which they are. Blueish and grayish is when body fluids, namely blood, are still present in the
corpse. This is called lividity. If there is no blood, there is no lividity.
There is blood on the back, beneath the head, in sufficient amount one may expect after a celebratory waving around. Similar to other beheading images
at the website. A large pooling at the neck, not unreasonable.
It has already been stated in other beheading instances, such as the Daniel Pearl video, the captives are heavily sedated prior to the beheading to
make them struggle less. This is not inconceiveable, though Pearl struggled dearly.
Also, look at how the barbarian grabs him under his chin, and raises his head back, up, and against him. This forceful motion, then entrapment of the
chin in such a manner, tends to render a person rather unable to do anything. The tactic seems to be used in most of the beheadings, as can be
witnessed at the above mentioned website. There are dozens, and dozens of stills, particularly of the soldiers from Syria, whose families were sent
their beheading photos. They also tend to bury a finger into the eye socket, for stability.
As to why the actual act was cut away? This doesn't really take a lot to figure out. It was "A message to America and Americans". They are at least
smart enough to know that a full beheading video would not be aired on television, let alone carried on most MSM outlets. Particularly after the
Daniel Pearl kerfuffle. The video did last longer, online, than this one. They wanted to reach a broader audience, and acheived that goal. The only
way they could do that was to sanitize the video.
They are also smart enough to know that Americans are becoming notorious for short attention spans, and live a 144 character life. The shorter the
better, TLDR, etc. The guy was British, afterall. He probably reads dailymail.co.uk, along with the rest of us. Who, in fact, carried the story, too,
didn't they?
www.dailymail.co.uk...
-extremists-known-The-Beatles.html
Even then, we are now seeing media blowback, and censoring of what little there is, even stills. This is largely due to the fact that ISIS has twitter
and Facebook accounts, and started tweeting celebratory stills from the video, mocking and laughing, taunting Americans.
What began as an attempt to quell propaganda from ISIS ends up in downright censorship, because, as has been mentioned about Daniel Pearl, MSM and
online media are being heavily criticised, and facing public backlash, for spreading propaganda, and giving ISIS the attention they seek.
With Daniel Pearl, it was largely stated, "We need to see this. We need to realize, and see what brutality we are up against."
That meme has changed now, to "Why must we see this? We don't need to see this anymore. We get it."
So, you can largely blame a vast public outcry, or, choose to put your head in the sand because you feel helpless, and unable to do anything about
it.
This works, up and until it starts happening here, and, from many signs, including rallies in Ferguson where someone was holding up a sign, "ISIS is
here", we can continue to pretend it's all fakery, until it hits our hometown.
Then, will it be so fake, anymore?
edit on 23-8-2014 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-8-2014 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)