It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Even the autopsy shows the same based on shot placement.
You mean the autopsy report where the pathologist who performed said he was "shot from a distance"?
Yep...the one done by Brown's family which stated it could have been exactly the scenario that the officer said happened....a bum-rush with multiple shots hitting him from the front and dropping a few feet from reaching the officer.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Blackmarketeer
Whenever I see this version of events, I have to ask:
Why would a police officer try to pull someone into a car with them?
Why would a man who was fleeing from a cop after an altercation where the cop's weapon was discharged (and he was possibly hit) stop abruptly in the middle of the street to taunt the cop and then charge him? As he was running in fear of being shot, he lost his fear of being shot?
originally posted by: OptimusCrime
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Another unsubstantiated, out of context "leak" that doesn't prove anything definitively about either what occurred at the vehicle or afterward.
Is the information about the injury true? It certainly could be. Could it have been from a punch? Sounds reasonable. Could it have been from the door? Possibly. What does it prove about what happened afterward? It doesn't even prove what happened in the vehicle.
It proves an altercation occurred. Do you want all the facts, or only ones that prove your point?
originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Actually she had been on FMLA leave since March:
www.mediaite.com...
originally posted by: theantediluvian
originally posted by: OptimusCrime
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Another unsubstantiated, out of context "leak" that doesn't prove anything definitively about either what occurred at the vehicle or afterward.
Is the information about the injury true? It certainly could be. Could it have been from a punch? Sounds reasonable. Could it have been from the door? Possibly. What does it prove about what happened afterward? It doesn't even prove what happened in the vehicle.
It proves an altercation occurred. Do you want all the facts, or only ones that prove your point?
This is potentially new information but as I stated, it doesn't help us to know exactly what happened. All of the witnesses said that an altercation occurred. Do you want cherry-picked "facts" from anonymous "leaks" at the FPD that support the cop's story?
No information about GSR on the shirt or hands. Why not leak that? No information about blood splatter on the vehicle. Why not leak that? There was a leak yesterday claiming that Michael Brown had marijuana in his system. Why leak that but not the results of any other preliminary toxicological screening that was obviously done if the positive marijuana result is to be believed?
originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: matafuchs
What you claim has nothing to do with the autopsy report. There is a thread on the autopsy report that discusses it.
Brown has one wound which is definitely from the front - a shot to the upper right chest.
Two shots to the head came from 'above' the head (Dr. Baden says head bent down would explain this, so top of head facing barrel of gun).
Three more shots struck Brown's inner arm.
It looks really bad for the cop scenario, not the witness scenario.
“This one here looks like his head was bent downward,” he said, indicating the wound at the very top of Mr. Brown’s head. “It can be because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer.”
originally posted by: TiedDestructor
originally posted by: Taggart
A Police source defending the police story?
Surely not.
I can't imagine any bias there.
Like all the family and friends of Michael defending their UN-BIASED story?
This road ain't no one way yo.