It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: glitchinthematrix
In so many threads pertaining to the Biblical Flood, I see people conceding that there is no scientific evidence to support it. So, I took it upon my little biased, Jesus-lovin' self to find some unbiased information. This is harder than it seems. Not because the facts don't exist, but because they are produced most often by the faith community.
originally posted by: np6888
a reply to: Krazysh0t
The answers to your argument here:
answersingenesis.org...
But first, we need to verify the age of those trees, and we need them to show us the methods of how they obtain that age.
originally posted by: np6888
a reply to: Krazysh0t
After reading about the Pando trees example, it appears that only the root system is 80,000 years old. The parts above ground are actually only 130 years old.
en.wikipedia.org...
You can see that the "verified" age of the oldest tree is no more than 5000 years old.