Mass Sighting Huge UFO Houston, TX

This to me looks like LED lights on a kite or R.C drone

It looks very similar to the Brazil Hoaxed UFO a few years ago

I am suprised so many people are taking this video so seriously.

a reply to: 300RYA

Have you read the whole thread? It was big, much bigger than a kite. There is more than one video of it and it morphed. If you are judging from one photo, well, so sad. . . .

STM

originally posted by: FlySolo...

Then I would like you to explain to me what camera that was and what location on the shuttle. What direction was the shuttle facing and what was the source of the water. I would like you to explain how you can surmise what speed ice crystals "should" be traveling in order to claim them as such. You should probably also have supporting video evidence of what "normal" ice crystals look like seeing its is common place.

These are all excellent questions and you will find a helpful background primer in my "99 FAQs" on my home page, and specifics about the STS-80 event on Tom Jones's page [he was on board that flight].

a reply to: 300RYA

What kind of "drone" a phantom or something more expensive? Because the next line up is about 15k and it would be suicide to take a UAV up into a storm. Say bye bye expensive toy.

Looong time lurker.

Haven't followed this much so sorry if I'm
missing something, but the live action video looks a little like explosions of light to me. And the ring pictures look a lot like ring shaped foreworks. Any video of the ring shaped object moving?

I'm on my phone and don't think I can post pics but here's a few simular fireworks.

deron.meranda.us...


learnmmd.com...

originally posted by: FlySolo

originally posted by: JimOberg
ChrLzs at
www.unexplained-mysteries.com...

posted this photo of street lights in that neighborhood

You get that from this?

Where's the lamp post? Why is it on an angle?

Yes you can get that from that.

Here's an example:


They are just reflections of highway lights.

Linky

Hmm it seems that ATS blacklisted that site. It wouldn't let me link to that site.

Debunked sorry to say.

a reply to: Deaf Alien



That street light sure gets around. A mass reflection phenomena? BTW, linky no worky.

a reply to: FlySolo

Yeah I know the link doesn't work. It seems that that site is one of those sites ATS blocks. Just quote me and you'll see the link.

But anyway yes they ARE street lights. And if there is a mass sighting of that UFO we would certainly see pictures and videos popping up by now yes?

a reply to: Deaf Alien

Yeah I know the link doesn't work. It seems that that site is one of those sites ATS blocks.

Could that be because it might be a known hoax site? I just tried googling Houston ufo debunked reflection and I got nothing.

But anyway yes they ARE street lights. And if there is a mass sighting of that UFO we would certainly see pictures and videos popping up by now yes?

Ok, why is it a street light? Where's the analysis?

eta: found it. This is your proof from the website that was linked

Several people have suggested the lights are just a reflection of the highway lamps in the windshield. Many have noted the similarity between the highway lamps and the circular lights.

Outstanding! Case closed.

a reply to: FlySolo

In this picture you posted:



I am not by any means a photography expert but take a look... obviously the camera is tilted to the right. That UFO is tilted to the left at the same angle.

Also, count the number of lights and you'll see they are the same number of lights on lamp post.

I'm still not sure whether this was real or not.

I might sound naive here, but it's an honest question.
Don't these tv channels have qualified people to check/analyze every video before putting it on the news to see whether it's real or not?

Would they put it on the news even if it was a hoax?
Are they this hungry for ratings?
I found a lot of witnesses just doing a search on twitter.
I wonder if someone credible could analyze it and give their honest opinion about the video, you know checking the pixels etc.

Edit to add: I also googled Houston mass ufo sighting hoax, and got nothing.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

What? You're a long standing member. I expect better than this.

a reply to: Rainbowresidue

It's for the ratings of course lol.

Edit to add: I also googled Houston mass ufo sighting hoax, and got nothing.

It's because there's nothing.

a reply to: Rainbowresidue

Don't these tv channels have qualified people to check/analyze every video before putting it on the news to see whether it's real or not?

No.
Frankly my dear, they don't give a damn.
"UFO? Sure. Run it."

a reply to: FlySolo

What? You're a long standing member. I expect better than this.

Better than what? It doesn't take much to figure it out.

Again...

We should see more pictures and videos of this UFO. Correct?

The lights on lamp posts and the UFOs are same. Correct?

And fyi I believe... no no no... I KNOW that aliens are here. I have seen a UFO before. What kills me is that some people just try to hoax to get attention, hurting the UFO community.

Now it's on you to explain that those UFOs are not reflections from street lights.

a reply to: Phage

www.fcc.gov...

Ok, so I was reading here that they only have to check it if enough people report the news / video to be not portraying the truth.

News Distortion. The Commission often receives complaints concerning broadcast journalism, such as allegations that stations have aired inaccurate or one-sided news reports or comments, covered stories inadequately, or overly dramatized the events that they cover. For the reasons noted above, the Commission generally will not intervene in such cases because it would be inconsistent with the First Amendment to replace the journalistic judgment of licensees with our own. However, as public trustees, broadcast licensees may not intentionally distort the news: the FCC has stated that “rigging or slanting the news is a most heinous act against the public interest.” The Commission will investigate a station for news distortion if it receives documented evidence of such rigging or slanting, such as testimony or other documentation, from individuals with direct personal knowledge that a licensee or its management engaged in the intentional falsification of the news. Of particular concern would be evidence of the direction to employees from station management to falsify the news.

I won't worry about this one too much.
After all, tomorrow is another day.
Ah, at this point I'll believe it if I either see it myself, or there is a mass sighting, which is more than the people I found on twitter. I wouldn't really call that a mass .

Ps: Nice touch with the Gone with the wind line.

a reply to: Rainbowresidue

Precisely. If it was really a mass sighting there would be MORE pictures and even AT LEAST ONE video of it.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Rainbowresidue

Precisely. If it was really a mass sighting there would be MORE pictures and even AT LEAST ONE video of it.

That's what I was thinking too.

I'm not saying they don't exist, I just think they might have blown this whole story up for better ratings, and called a few people a mass.
( I think I counted around 7 people on a page who said they saw it on twitter though not all of them had photos.)

Don't you think that if this was something as mundane as "streetlight reflection" it would have happened rather a lot and people wouldn't be surprised by it and reporting it as unusual? I for one have never not ever seen streetlights reflected in a circle in the sky!!

Here's a website that is staying updated on this story, definitely worth a read. And also it seems that there have been many sightings of lights in the sky of Texas previous to the Houston storm sightings.

www.texasufosightings.com...


STM