It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
So the police shot someone and the appropriate response is to ruin your own neighborhood? I never understood that. And then the left winders why there is such a dearth of stores and businesses willing to locate into these neighborhoods. Food desserts indeed.
I'm sorry the kid was shot, but this will not solve anything.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
That makes no sense. If the looters did not have guns, but bats and tire irons and axes, would it be any different? What is one or even several people going to do against dozens of looters? Nothing. However, one good man with a gun hand hold off dozens with baseball bats.
As a force multiplier, only an idiot could not understand how a firearm helps an individual protect himself or herself from a mob of people. A firearm helps the weaker, physically and numerically, defend themselves from the stronger.
originally posted by: jimmyx
police shoot a unarmed black person, riot happens, 3 days later back to normal...repeat as necessary.
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: jimmyx
police shoot a unarmed black person, riot happens, 3 days later back to normal...repeat as necessary.
Back to normal for people who live elsewhere sure but for the people who live in these areas that were looted by thugs it will take a lot more then 3 days.
Yeah happened here in the UK. Instead of marching on Westminster and the people that caused it they just trashed there own neighborhoods. Weird logic.
originally posted by: LDragonFire
Black people didn't get the right to vote till 1965 and this right had to be enforced by the federal government. Desegregation had to be enforced by the federal government. The fourteenth amendment in 1868 gave them the right to vote but state and local laws known as Jim Crow laws took those right away all in a effort to keep them down or not represented. Obama was elected president so the right claims racism no longer exist but they have enacted a new round of Jim Crow laws with voter ID, after the republican majority supreme court took the teeth out of the voter rights act of 1965. Look at how many militias have formed since Obama was elected, look at gun sales and the rise of the extreme right they are anti voting rights anti immigrants, the new brand of racial terms such as thugs and animals.
Blacks have suffered the most heinous injustices ever recorded by civilized people here in America, for over 200 years. A history of slavery, lynchings, segregation, brutality, murder, rape, assassination, medical experimentation.
You wanna complain about black culture, but the last time I looked it was American culture.
The police said he pushed the cop back into his car and a shoot was fired, then he ran so did the cop finish him off by shooting him in the back?
The people in the neighborhood said he had his hands in the air and was shoot once then while on the ground the policeman walked up and finished him off.
Who do you believe the cop or the neighborhood that witnessed this? Not one witness has come forward supporting the cops side of the story.
Do you support a fascist police state?
Do you support freedom and liberty and equality?
Do you support equal rights? This group has not really ever had equal rights even though the Constitution claims all men are equal, but not Blacks, Indians, Orientals or Latinos.
I don't support rioting, but I do support fighting against injustice. Has our communities of black folks suffered from injustice? Are our prisons filled with black people?
Why doesn't our shining city on a hill not include black people?
originally posted by: SuperFrog
originally posted by: NavyDoc
That makes no sense. If the looters did not have guns, but bats and tire irons and axes, would it be any different? What is one or even several people going to do against dozens of looters? Nothing. However, one good man with a gun hand hold off dozens with baseball bats.
As a force multiplier, only an idiot could not understand how a firearm helps an individual protect himself or herself from a mob of people. A firearm helps the weaker, physically and numerically, defend themselves from the stronger.
Your logic would just make sense if you compare apples and oranges, like you did in this example.
What would happen if dozen of people had guns and wanted to loot - funeral for you single good gun owners, and brings truth to my statement that this all will boil down to who has more guns good or bad people, thanks to huge gun production machine we have here.
I knew for beginning that is pointless to discuss guns on ATS, as my views are bit different and I know that is possible to live without guns (lived half of my life in Europe) ... To some of you, that just seems impossible... I know...
The officer tried to leave his vehicle just before the shooting on Saturday afternoon, but Brown pushed him back into the car, “where he physically assaulted the police officer” and struggled over the officer’s weapon, Belmar said. A shot was fired inside the police car, and Brown was eventually shot about 35 feet away from the vehicle, Belmar said, adding few details because he didn’t want to “prejudice” the case.
originally posted by: LDragonFire
a reply to: NavyDoc
Stereotype much? So they are all criminals in this neighborhood?
originally posted by: Thefarmer
Yes but that was decades ago and I applaud it but times change and so have the police and government so people have to change with them.
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: LDragonFire
a reply to: NavyDoc
Stereotype much? So they are all criminals in this neighborhood?
Anyone who participated in the looting are criminals.
originally posted by: LDragonFire
a reply to: NavyDoc
Stereotype much? So they are all criminals in this neighborhood?
originally posted by: LDragonFire
So no one will admit that this race of people have suffered hundreds of years of injustice?