It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Lyxdeslic
I'm saying we are 100% responsible for Iraq in it's present state. We created this monster so it should be our responsibility to destroy it. I mean, we are supposed to be in the terrorist destruction business, are we not?
There's no need for boots on the ground. Airstrikes can take of ISIS alone. The Iraqi gov't (Shiite) has asked for help, the Kurd's have asked for help, and so have the Yazidis (the ones facing genocide).
But People have a Choice…
And we both know that it won't end with airstrikes, boots will be on the ground, and we'll have another war on our hands.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: elixz
But People have a Choice…
Ask the people who Hamas recruits that have had their whole families wiped out… you think they have a "choice"?
What if you hood was bombed, friends and families killed, your home destroyed? What if you weren't allowed to leave, your water and power turned off and food was disappearing? What if that had been recurring your whole life over and again?
Easy to claim "choices" when far removed from that scene.
Easy to claim "choices" when far removed from that scene
I am unsure what you're getting at... Stop confusing me
originally posted by: cody599
My question is, why is OK for the USA to attack a perceived threat on the other side of the world, when it isn't OK for Israel to defend it's citizens from a very real terrorist organisation launching missiles at it ?
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: cody599
My question is, why is OK for the USA to attack a perceived threat on the other side of the world, when it isn't OK for Israel to defend it's citizens from a very real terrorist organisation launching missiles at it ?
Because Jews are being threatened in one instance and Christians are being threatened in the other instance.
Hate to be the one to point out the obvious. . . . .
originally posted by: cody599
originally posted by: criticalhit
It's okay because...
The American supporters of Palestine are complete morons that run the gamut between Hippies picking up a trendy cause to blatant Jew hating whack jobs who read to many conspiracy theories and fall in deep with the more ridiculous ones, the kind of people who watched Iron Sky and thought it was a documentary
America killed 500,000 Iraqi's for no reason basically, Jews shoot back it's a genocide.. the same dummies don't even realize Isis across Iraq and Syria, The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Hamas are basically identical by philosophy and would link up and be a nightmare if Israel wasn't there or that about the only thing far flung states in the region like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt can even agree upon is that such a thing would potentially doom all their govts as well...
Why is it okay?
Cus Murica
lol
As much as I appreciate your support in my thread, please may I ask you to keep it civil ?
There's no need to start calling people morons, we all have our opinions and are entitled them.
Let's not make this a slagging match please
Cody
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: cody599
Being that ISIS is a creation directly out of the false war in Iraq of 2003, and meddling in Syria, the US & friends are responsible for their existence. Being that ISIS is committing genocide it's the US & friends responsibility to stop it.
originally posted by: cody599
Hi guys
One has to ask after the rhetoric on ATS of late regarding Gaza/Israel
Is it OK for the USA to attack ISIS with air strikes ?
Let's start this with a bit of a reality check...............................USA is under no direct threat of immediate missile attack from ISIS, no American city is likely to be hit by a missile in the foreseeable future, yet air strikes have been ordered and indeed the MSM is proudly showing said strikes taking out terrorists thousands of miles away from any real perceivable threat to either America or indeed Europe.
This is being applauded
Israel is under a sustained attack, a very real threat of death for it's citizens, has offered ceasefire upon ceasefire, extensions to ceasefires, and has been refused.
Israel in this current conflict has only ever reacted to attack. Yes the civilian loss of life is lamentable, but if Hamas choose to use human shields for propaganda what can you expect ?
My question is, why is OK for the USA to attack a perceived threat on the other side of the world, when it isn't OK for Israel to defend it's citizens from a very real terrorist organisation launching missiles at it ?
Just a thought
Cody
My question is, why is OK for the USA to attack a perceived threat on the other side of the world, when it isn't OK for Israel to defend it's citizens from a very real terrorist organisation launching missiles at it ?
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: cody599
My question is, why is OK for the USA to attack a perceived threat on the other side of the world, when it isn't OK for Israel to defend it's citizens from a very real terrorist organisation launching missiles at it ?
Because Jews are being threatened in one instance and Christians are being threatened in the other instance.
Hate to be the one to point out the obvious. . . . .
Early Man
Canaanite
Egyptian
Assyrian
Israelite
Babylonian
Macedonian/Greek
Greek/Macedonian
Ptolemaic
Seleucid
Hebrew Priest
Maccabee
Roman
Byzantine
Arab Caliph
Crusader
Mamluk of Egypt
Ottoman Turk
Arab
British
Palestinian
European Jew/Zionist
PLO/Hamas/Hezbollah
State of Israel
Guerrilla/Freedom Fighter/Terrorist
and finally…
The Angel of Death