posted on Jul, 29 2014 @ 01:24 PM
The West is reporting today about how Hamas spent over 1 billion to build tunnels and how financially irresponsible that was but failed to mention
that US taxpayers paid hundreds of millions of dollars for the Iron Dome defense system in Israel. They shame the Palestinians for paying for their
own defense while never mentioning the large military handouts Israel receives from the income of Americans who are not Israeli citizens. To not
discuss the relationship with the US and the actions and actors of 1948, the evidence throughout the late 19th century and early 20th century
regarding Zionism, and the fact that Palestine has no actual standing military of any kind is showing no desire for a solution. If the problems of
1948 have not been resolved, how can one reason that an overall solution can be reached? If the root of a problem is never discussed what about that
problem could be permanently relieved? What military does Palestine have to defend itself with? Hamas is like the black market version of a
military. There was a void to fill and as Palestinians saw their borders shrink, a foreign enemy that created borders, disorganized military allies,
and a need for security. Hamas didn't exist until Israel did. There was no group running around waiting for Israel to be formed so a jihad could
be launched. Iran had a democratically elected leader until 1953. But after 1948, everything seemed to dramatically change. Arab people were
displaced, Persians had their leader illegally removed by a foreign government all for a higher percentage of ownership of what laid beneath Persia,
and terrorism became a useful tool against covert oppressors who were trying to give the impression these were organic coups and not financially
backed military operations lead by western governments for corporate gains. Corporations and Western governments imposed their will after the
dismantling of the Ottoman Empire and to not take that into consideration is to completely discredit a culture's history and the illusion that this
is some kind of one-sided war. We call people barbarians, then strike them with uranium tipped bullets. We raze villages in countries that not
only don't share our land borders, but don't even share a border with the same oceans as the US. But they are barbarians. They with no aircraft
carriers, no air force, and no means of which to pose an actual threat to the West....unless the West happens to be literally in their backyards.
They who kill far fewer human beings and exist in no space of our physical reality are the ones we should 'fear'? Who among us in the western world
would simply be okay with another country coming into our homeland and imposing its military, economic and political ideologies on us? We dropped
two nuclear weapons on a country that attacked a military outpost in a place that wasn't even a state yet. We destroyed a country's infrastructure
and took over their opium business after our former allies in the 80's, the Taliban, may or may not have had something to do with planes crashing
into our buildings that our government may or may not have had something to do with............in other words, we would react poorly. So to think
that another country wouldn't or shouldn't feel the need to defend itself in a similar way, for similar reasons is to be in cultural denial. I
don't know if western doctors have a diagnosis for that yet, but if they have a pill they can convince you to buy to cure it, I'm sure
cultural-denial will become an epidemic.
This is a situation born from the collaboration of maniacs so to not understand how that would naturally create fanatics is to warmly embrace an
illusion. If your government, economy and society had been manipulated for decades could you foresee people wanting to rise up against that? Could
you understand how generations could be bred to dislike those that they feel put a yolk on them? This land has seen European invaders for centuries
and this cycle is no different. All of the politics and ideologies are just labels to justify specific behavior that continues to repeat itself but
there was a group of people living in this area that were pushed off by another group of people, who were backed by the only two countries to own
atomic weapons at the time, for reasons that have never been fully presented nor rationally discussed with the international community.
Everything that has happened after 1948, on both sides, overcomplicates one simple question of 'who was living in this area and why were they pushed
off?'
Should all people who have been displaced, and feel they can prove it through their religion's belief, be given their original land back? Should
all people who feel they have been oppressed be given a international mandate to squat on another country's shores? The creation of Israel set a
modern precedent that has been quieted with terms like anti-semitic (FYI Arabs are semitic people so I would love to hear the discussion of
anti-semitism and how it applies to Arabs) but without discussing Israel's formation, free of the oversensitivity to the truth, this situation will
continue until one or both sides are exterminated, which means we all lose.