SyFy Channel July 20, "ALIENS ON THE MOON: THE TRUTH EXPOSED"

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: Jay-morris

There are, and they have been out there for years - decades even.

There are the original Lunar Orbiter photographs, published in many books and lunar atlases and recently rescanned from the original transmission tapes, there are the Apollo Panoramic Camera images and Metric camera images, all of which are available in rescanned format and that show extremely high levels of detail. The Apollo Hasselblad images have also been around for years on the wen and decades in print


Then there are the LRO mages, Chandrayaan images, Japan's Kaguya photographs, even China's images are available on line. There are also very high resolution images from Mars probes freely available on line.

The people who do not want high resolution photographs of the moon made public are the ones making money out of UFO scams, getting you to buy their books and DVDs and following their clickbait to get the advertising revenue. They are the ones telling lies, not the real space research organisations.

The people who do not want high resolution images so

Well, if thats the case, and we have hi res photos of the moon, in the same places that we are seeing these strutures, then thats game over then really. Case closed.

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: JimOberg



UFO proponent making a nice living out of telling lies exaggerates his credentials shocker...

Johnston isn't making a living off this, and the sad part is, I presume he's sincere and believes his own stories. I do not believe, or claim, he is lying. That's the more interesting part, how EACH of us can 'edit' our memories to 'improve' our role in our own earlier years.

We've seen the same effect in Gordon Cooper's famous UFO tales, which improve over the years and place himself more and more into the center of events he only indirectly heard about at the Officers Club bar.

a reply to: JimOberg

Oh I'm well aware of how memory can be a creative process - you can see it every day in ordinary conversations as an event is re-told, and eyewitness testimony is certainly not reliable. You only have to listen to various recountings of events by (for example) Gene Cernan to see how how a distance from the event in terms of time can exaggerate and distort memory. The essential truth of an event does remain however. Witnesses may disagree over whether a getaway car was red or blue, but not that there was one. Cernan may over-egg the pudding in terms of how fast and how much the Apollo 10 lunar module span when it lost control, but lose control it did.

There is a huge difference between that and just making s*** up. Claiming to have been involved in the cover up of and destroying of evidence for alien bases pretty much falls into that category as far as I am concerned.